I noticed that the "Overall" section on some Burst pages feature tabbed sections for certain formats. For example, the Forge Disk - 00 page states:
What I wanted to ask was: Would it be okay if we went back and revised some older MFB pages to fit the same format? Many pages treat the performance of parts like a vacuum, only really taking into consideration when the part was released. If we go back and update them, then players would be able to tell apart their performance in the three major formats (Standard, 4D, and Limited). For example, a part like Ronin would read:
Code:
<tabber>
|-|Burst=
'''00'''<nowiki/>'s heavy weight and ideal weight distribution makes it highly versatile and useful in all Combinations. At the time of its release it was the heaviest Disc available, and '''00''' remained a viable Disc for almost two years. However, '''00''' is too light to remain competitive in the current metagame, as it has subsequently been outclassed by later releases in the Superking Layer System and onward, such as [[Forge Disc - Wheel|Wheel]] and [[Forge Disc - Over|Over]].
'''As such, 00 is not recommended for the Burst Format.'''
|-|Burst GT=
When paired with a Disc Frame, '''00''' is a decent Disc option in the WBO's Burst GT Format. While some Gatinko Discs such as [[Forge Disc - Around|Around]] or [[Forge Disc - Sting|Sting]] may be more desirable, '''00''' is still a strong contender in the format.
'''As such, 00 is not a must have but is instead a welcome addition for the Burst GT Format.'''
|-|Burst Limited=
'''00'''<nowiki/>'s high versatility makes it a top tier Disc choice in the WBO's Burst Limited Format, where stronger Discs released after '''00''' are restricted. '''00''' is one of the four strongest Core Discs in the format, alongside [[Forge Disc - 0|0]], [[Forge Disc - 7|7]], and [[Forge Disc - 10|10]].
'''As such, 00 is a must have for the Burst Limited Format.'''
|-|Burst Classic=
'''00''' is not legal in the WBO's Burst Classic Format.
<nowiki/>
</tabber>What I wanted to ask was: Would it be okay if we went back and revised some older MFB pages to fit the same format? Many pages treat the performance of parts like a vacuum, only really taking into consideration when the part was released. If we go back and update them, then players would be able to tell apart their performance in the three major formats (Standard, 4D, and Limited). For example, a part like Ronin would read:
Code:
<tabber>
|-|Standard=
Like other Element Wheels, '''Ronin''' is outclassed in all aspects by Warrior Wheels, which are used in Synchrome combinations.
'''As such, Ronin is not recommended for the Metal Fight Standard Format.'''
|-|4D=
Like other Element Wheels, '''Ronin''' is far too light to make Warrior Wheels viable in the Metal Fight 4D Format, where Synchrome combinations are banned.
'''As such, Ronin is not recommended for the Metal Fight 4D Format.'''
|-|Limited=
Unlike many other Element Wheels, '''Ronin''' features a large protrusion that grants it high-reaching smash attack. This protrusion allows '''Ronin''' to counter [[Spin Track - 230|230]] height stamina combinations.
'''As such, Ronin is a must have for the Metal Fight Limited Format.'''
</tabber>