(Mar. 09, 2011 11:40 PM)Ultrablader Wrote: [ -> ]There's already lots of testing on that in the sticky grip thread.
lol, that is where all the tests i posted came from, none of those where my tests
(i even said that in my posts)
i didn't see any pegasis 85 tests in it though
Pegasis does do better with 85, and it is in the Sticky Grip thread. (McFrowns post, second last.)
It does like 30% better than 145 soo..
(Mar. 10, 2011 12:30 AM)Dan Wrote: [ -> ]Pegasis does do better with 85, and it is in the Sticky Grip thread. (McFrowns post, second last.)
It does like 30% better than 145 soo..
yep i see it now, although it did better it is more tier 1.5 then tier 1 material from the results
Just one question, are all the parts in every section are from stronger to weaker for that type?
Only in the metal wheel section for attack are they in any specific order.
What about Libra CH120RF for balance.
It's largely outclassed now.
I think that XF is to be moved to tier one. Mc frown's homing dragon combo...
So wait. MLD is NOT a smash attacker?îƒ
(Mar. 14, 2011 5:03 PM)Shika blade Wrote: [ -> ]I think that XF is to be moved to tier one. Mc frown's homing dragon combo...
So wait. MLD is NOT a smash attacker?îƒ
XF is does not have near the utility of RF nor does it have any parallel consistency.
Did you even bother looking at my thread, BladeStorm?
Also, thanks for that Shika. MLD is no where near a smash attacker as it has little smash.. I think it is in its own little niche category like destabilizers are.
(Mar. 14, 2011 5:32 PM)Dan Wrote: [ -> ]Did you even bother looking at my thread, BladeStorm?
Also, thanks for that Shika. MLD is no where near a smash attacker as it has little smash.. I think it is in its own little niche category like destabilizers are.
No, but I bothered playing with it against a human.
(Mar. 14, 2011 5:32 PM)Dan Wrote: [ -> ]Did you even bother looking at my thread, BladeStorm?
Also, thanks for that Shika. MLD is no where near a smash attacker as it has little smash.. I think it is in its own little niche category like destabilizers are.
No little smash. It has smash like Pegasis. It does really well, if you see test results. In my vids, it shows Meteo L-Drago KOing Earth Bull
. Doesn't OS much.
The day rubber has smash like metal..
Bladestorm, how did you even shoot it? Most of the time it requires skill and knowledge to shoot properly..
(Mar. 14, 2011 5:38 PM)Dan Wrote: [ -> ]The day rubber has smash like metal..
Bladestorm, how did you even shoot it? Most of the time it requires skill and knowledge to shoot properly..
Quit attacking me. I've read your thread before. It has major downfalls against 230 combos.
meteo has good smash but not that much we finished discussing that after no one agreed to mine Dan's and shika blades arguments
the rubber does provide some smashh but not as much as the metal wheels!
(Mar. 14, 2011 5:33 PM)BladeStorm Wrote: [ -> ] (Mar. 14, 2011 5:32 PM)Dan Wrote: [ -> ]Did you even bother looking at my thread, BladeStorm?
Also, thanks for that Shika. MLD is no where near a smash attacker as it has little smash.. I think it is in its own little niche category like destabilizers are.
No, but I bothered playing with it against a human.
(Mar. 14, 2011 5:41 PM)BladeStorm Wrote: [ -> ]Quit attacking me. I've read your thread before. It has major downfalls against 230 combos.
Beautiful consistency, also, I
intelligently used 120 height against 230 and I'll revise that today. (Using 145 will kill those 'downfalls'.) Note sarcasm with italics..
(Mar. 14, 2011 5:50 PM)Dan Wrote: [ -> ]Beautiful consistency, also, I intelligently used 120 height against 230 and I'll revise that today. (Using 145 will kill those 'downfalls'.) Note sarcasm with italics..
What do you want from me? What is the sarcasm for? I read your thread after you notified me of its existence. I'm not impolite so I took up your invitation to read it.
Putting the word 'before' implied you did so before this conversation. Sarcasm was on 'intelligent' because it was stupid of me not to use 145 against 230 in the first place. :V
(Mar. 14, 2011 5:57 PM)Dan Wrote: [ -> ]Putting the word 'before' implied you did so before this conversation. Sarcasm was on 'intelligent' because it was stupid of me not to use 145 against 230 in the first place. :V
I'm normally competent with words, so the one time I make a mistake something bad happens
. Anyway, I only said that XF has less utility and consistency compared to RF. I didn't say anything about specific combos. Quit harassing me please.
Add basalt to attack and defense tiers list
and burn to attack tier list
lets stop fighting and get back on topic!
(Mar. 14, 2011 6:41 PM)bigbangblaze Wrote: [ -> ]lets stop fighting and get back on topic!
We're not fighting, I said XF has less consistency and utility compared to RF and Dan asked me if I read his thread or not because he's trigger happy to lob his thread at people to prove a point.
(Mar. 14, 2011 6:00 PM)BladeStorm Wrote: [ -> ]Quit harassing me please.
(Mar. 14, 2011 6:47 PM)Dan Wrote: [ -> ] (Mar. 14, 2011 6:00 PM)BladeStorm Wrote: [ -> ]Quit harassing me please.
I don't understand this at all. I tried to explain what I meant 3 times already. Can you be a bit more clearer about what you mean about your thread and XF compared to RF.
I am not actually trying to compare XF to RF as they are completely different, but you originally said it was not consistent while it can be if you shoot it correctly.. Therefore leading you to my thread which gave a few examples of ways to shoot XF, though you could argue that they are not comprehensive. In reference to the question you responded to, it could be tier 1 if used well. I do not think it belongs at the bottom unless the rankings are inverted for tier 2..