for me...... PS3! PS3! PS3!

EDIT: ok rules
1. Name which 1 u like better and why
2. Spammers will get reported

I have both but my Xbox gets used a hell of a lot more

---

Drawings | Youtube

I could have sworn there was already a topic for this... I think it got closed. Either way your OP should at least have some rules. Otherwise people might just spam the thread.

I thought this topic already existed already too, but I couldn't find it so... I gotta agree with you and say PS3 all the way! I honestly don't think its worth paying for online when PS3 has free online, great graphics, good games and it can play Blu-Ray!

Also, you should probably edit the OP telling people to justify their choice to cut down on some spam.

---

|Member of Elite Beyblade Team: The Prodigies|

|Official Prodigies YouTube Channel!|

I like XBox alot more since graphics aren't as good but is right up there with the ps3 it has Halo (I love halo) it has call of duty and it is has army of 2 one of my favourite games

---

Stop that, duh right now, or i'll put my asian music fulll volume

Everyone Please Read (Click to View)

My Youtube If you live in Perth click here to have some battles. All credit goes to DX for the avatar.

I have both, but I use my PS3 to play Black Ops, and MW2
But I use my XBOX for the HALO!

So I use them about evenly, so I love em both

---

My thread on the game The Little Battlers here:
http://worldbeyblade.org/Thread-The-Little-Battlers
Add me on Xbox

Spoiler (Click to View)

Add me on PSN

Spoiler (Click to View)

I own both of these consoles and they both have what is good and bad about them.

PS3:
Free playstation network, great graphics and a Blu-Ray player.

Xbox:
Party chat (better than game chat IMO), controller feels nice (also my own opinion but down to personal preference), headset can be plugged into controller (instead of the bluetooth PS3 headsets) and most of my friends are on Xbox.

X-Box. To me it seems as if the PS3 does everything to follow the crowd and make money. It's like everything is unoriginal and there is no new innovation. It's like they focus more on graphics, than on innovation, which is what I'd rather see in a Video Game console.

Motion:
Wii
PlayStation Move (which is basically just the same exact idea of the Wii but with better graphics and motion sensing)
Kinect (which in my opinion, is a great new idea that hasn't been seen by mainstream game consoles)

Then they come out with the PSVita. It's a portable PS3, with a touchscreen. Man, I have [i]never[/] seen a touchscreen before!

See what I mean?

---

"Yeah we're all going the same way down. I'm just trying to write it all down." - The Airborne Toxic Event

| Spectrum GFX Team | Beyblade: Redemption | PenPad Forums | Poké-Fusion Lab |

I like both, but Xbox fanboys boast way too much! Plus PS3 have better exclusives IMO.

NooDooSoup: although ps3 isn't original, the games are more unique for PS3.

NooDooSoup: although ps3 isn't original, the games are more unique for PS3.

The games, which are not even made by Sony. What I'm saying is, Sony's systems are just unoriginal trend followers trying to make money. Like come on, think of your own idea for once!

---

"Yeah we're all going the same way down. I'm just trying to write it all down." - The Airborne Toxic Event

| Spectrum GFX Team | Beyblade: Redemption | PenPad Forums | Poké-Fusion Lab |

ahhhhh yes the argument of the last few years .
personaally ill go for ps3 because i prefer the games that ps3 have and it has free internet

---

Look at this (Click to View)

Thanks Angry Face :D
Plastics request thread, request your combo ||
What to Buy in Plastics || Plastic Parts Discussion|| Competative Heavy Metal System Combos|| HMS Parts Disscusion

The games, which are not even made by Sony.

Sony has the most first party development studios (meaning development houses Sony owns) of the 3 hardware manufacturers. Conversely, Microsoft has the least, and least by a huge margin.

X-Box. To me it seems as if the PS3 does everything to follow the crowd and make money. It's like everything is unoriginal and there is no new innovation. It's like they focus more on graphics, than on innovation, which is what I'd rather see in a Video Game console.

Motion:
Wii
PlayStation Move (which is basically just the same exact idea of the Wii but with better graphics and motion sensing)
Kinect (which in my opinion, is a great new idea that hasn't been seen by mainstream game consoles)

Then they come out with the PSVita. It's a portable PS3, with a touchscreen. Man, I have [i]never[/] seen a touchscreen before!

See what I mean?

Apparently PS2 isn't mainstream. That's odd, because it is the best selling console of all time...

As for Vita, I never knew backtouch, console to handheld cross multiplayer, and transfer saves were ever done before in the video game space.

To me it seems like you don't really know much about Sony, and conversely spout nonsense. Yeah, they're very much a re-active company, but it doesn't mean they didn't push the industry in ways.

---

Project Rising Beetle→
I Miss Bionix→

NooDooSoup: although ps3 isn't original, the games are more unique for PS3.

The games, which are not even made by Sony. What I'm saying is, Sony's systems are just unoriginal trend followers trying to make money. Like come on, think of your own idea for once!

Okay, Sony developed those games, and To, even said that. All Xbox has are their precious Gears of War and Halo. Xbox isn't even original either because they always take the games that PS had first. For and example, they took Devil May Cry, Resident Evil and there taking MGS 2 and 3. So which is more unoriginal? All PS3 took was Mass Effect. And you're treating as if Sony is greedy, look at Bill Gates, "richest man on earth" and he charges the online players too. So you're just being biased.

I must agree with you Nuelyt, Microsoft is merely robbing all XBOX online players, at least with PS3 online is free for the entire year.

Xbox you have to pay 60 dollars for a year, do you know what people can do with that.

If anything Microsoft is greedy, at least Sony doesnt charge you just to play games with friends.

---

My thread on the game The Little Battlers here:
http://worldbeyblade.org/Thread-The-Little-Battlers
Add me on Xbox

Spoiler (Click to View)

Add me on PSN

Spoiler (Click to View)

NooDooSoup: although ps3 isn't original, the games are more unique for PS3.

The games, which are not even made by Sony. What I'm saying is, Sony's systems are just unoriginal trend followers trying to make money. Like come on, think of your own idea for once!

Okay, Sony developed those games, and To, even said that. All Xbox has are their precious Gears of War and Halo. Xbox isn't even original either because they always take the games that PS had first. For and example, they took Devil May Cry, Resident Evil and there taking MGS 2 and 3. So which is more unoriginal? All PS3 took was Mass Effect. And you're treating as if Sony is greedy, look at Bill Gates, "richest man on earth" and he charges the online players too. So you're just being biased.

You have to be biased to post on this thread

NooDooSoup: although ps3 isn't original, the games are more unique for PS3.

The games, which are not even made by Sony. What I'm saying is, Sony's systems are just unoriginal trend followers trying to make money. Like come on, think of your own idea for once!

Okay, Sony developed those games, and To, even said that. All Xbox has are their precious Gears of War and Halo. Xbox isn't even original either because they always take the games that PS had first. For and example, they took Devil May Cry, Resident Evil and there taking MGS 2 and 3. So which is more unoriginal? All PS3 took was Mass Effect. And you're treating as if Sony is greedy, look at Bill Gates, "richest man on earth" and he charges the online players too. So you're just being biased.

You have to be biased to post on this thread

No. Actually I have both systems, so i know what i am saying, since i have both to actually compare with.

Okay, Sony developed those games, and To, even said that. All Xbox has are their precious Gears of War and Halo. Xbox isn't even original either because they always take the games that PS had first. For and example, they took Devil May Cry, Resident Evil and there taking MGS 2 and 3. So which is more unoriginal? All PS3 took was Mass Effect. And you're treating as if Sony is greedy, look at Bill Gates, "richest man on earth" and he charges the online players too. So you're just being biased.

First: Carlos Slim Helu is the worlds richest man.
Second: Gears and Halo aren't the only Xbox exclusive games, that's like saying PS3 only has Infamous and Uncharted.
Third: There is no point to this thread because at the end of the day this is all decided by individual opinion.
Fourth: The "Xbox live cost $60 so Bill Gates can make money" argument is ridiculous. That money is used to pay Microsoft employees, Gates could care less about it.
Fifth: Don't act like PSN wasn't down for an entire month when you talk carp about the price of XBL. Microsoft couldn't afford to have XBL down for a month, Sony can because it's a free service.
At the end of the day this entire argument is pointless because neither console is truly better. The difference in the hardware is negligible and they both share a lot of games. The exclusives aren't good enough to justify one console over the other. Blu-ray isn't a good argument either because it's a GAME console, not a home theater system, you shouldn't care whether or not it can play movies. I own an Xbox, but after researching the systems I've found that they might as well be the same thing. In fact if you took the best hardware pieces from both systems and used it to make one system, I promise you wouldn't even notice the difference.

---

this is dumb, anyone can make up an obscure question with not enough logical hints to lead to an answer
that's not a riddle, it's a waste of time

This is of my favorite Brad quotes from the good old days (Click to View)

...

It's a plastic model. You really don't want me to answer that question. rofl

Hi Roan,

It seems that you've accidentally found yourself in a topic you're not at all interested in. Please click http://forums.beywiki.com to return to the forums index.

Thanks,

Tamer Brad
Beywiki.com Staff

Saying Blu-Ray isn't a good bullet point for gaming is quite ignorant given how many Xbox 360 games suffer from compression due to DVD sizes and don't have that on PS3. Both L.A. Noire, and Final Fantasy XIII suffer from this - and they're pretty big games.

As well, thanks to Blu-Ray, you can have demos of games on movie discs. Such as Final Fantasy XIII on Advent Children Complete, or Resistance 3 on Battle L.A. or even include Movie/Game packs like Paramount is doing with Days of Thunder, and Top Gun.

---

Project Rising Beetle→
I Miss Bionix→

Saying Blu-Ray isn't a good bullet point for gaming is quite ignorant given how many Xbox 360 games suffer from compression due to DVD sizes and don't have that on PS3. Both L.A. Noire, and Final Fantasy XIII suffer from this - and they're pretty big games.

As well, thanks to Blu-Ray, you can have demos of games on movie discs. Such as Final Fantasy XIII on Advent Children Complete, or Resistance 3 on Battle L.A. or even include Movie/Game packs like Paramount is doing with Days of Thunder, and Top Gun.

The majority of games don't have that problem, in fact only extremely large RPGs have that problem. If a game as large as Mass Effect or Oblivion can fit on one disk without Blu-ray, then LA Noire and FFXIII have no excuse.

---

this is dumb, anyone can make up an obscure question with not enough logical hints to lead to an answer
that's not a riddle, it's a waste of time

This is of my favorite Brad quotes from the good old days (Click to View)

...

It's a plastic model. You really don't want me to answer that question. rofl

Hi Roan,

It seems that you've accidentally found yourself in a topic you're not at all interested in. Please click http://forums.beywiki.com to return to the forums index.

Thanks,

Tamer Brad
Beywiki.com Staff

Their excuse is that they weren't developed on PC, or 360. I think that's valid.

---

Project Rising Beetle→
I Miss Bionix→

Okay, Sony developed those games, and To, even said that. All Xbox has are their precious Gears of War and Halo. Xbox isn't even original either because they always take the games that PS had first. For and example, they took Devil May Cry, Resident Evil and there taking MGS 2 and 3. So which is more unoriginal? All PS3 took was Mass Effect. And you're treating as if Sony is greedy, look at Bill Gates, "richest man on earth" and he charges the online players too. So you're just being biased.

First: Carlos Slim Helu is the worlds richest man.
Second: Gears and Halo aren't the only Xbox exclusive games, that's like saying PS3 only has Infamous and Uncharted.
Third: There is no point to this thread because at the end of the day this is all decided by individual opinion.
Fourth: The "Xbox live cost $60 so Bill Gates can make money" argument is ridiculous. That money is used to pay Microsoft employees, Gates could care less about it.
Fifth: Don't act like PSN wasn't down for an entire month when you talk carp about the price of XBL. Microsoft couldn't afford to have XBL down for a month, Sony can because it's a free service.
At the end of the day this entire argument is pointless because neither console is truly better. The difference in the hardware is negligible and they both share a lot of games. The exclusives aren't good enough to justify one console over the other. Blu-ray isn't a good argument either because it's a GAME console, not a home theater system, you shouldn't care whether or not it can play movies. I own an Xbox, but after researching the systems I've found that they might as well be the same thing. In fact if you took the best hardware pieces from both systems and used it to make one system, I promise you wouldn't even notice the difference.

Okay, well Halo and Gears of War are only the best exclusives for Xbox, the only one I would actually consider to be a good Xbox exclusive is Forza, and to be honest, Gran Turismo and Wipe Out are better. I would like to see you name at least 10-15 exclusives on Xbox that were GOOD.
And wow, how unoriginal of people bashing PS because it went down, it wasn't entirely PS fault, I mean sure, their online security is bad, but the hackers are just greedy carps. Plus if you probably think about it, they hacked PSN after the earthquake, so Sony probably had a hard time fixing the Network because of their server or equipment that got messed up during the earthquake, like that is so pathetic of people bashing Sony because of that, what if Xbox went down? How would the fanboys react?
So Microsoft charges players so that Microsoft workers make money? Sony doesn't charge players to Sony workers make money.
Plus you said that you have a Xbox console, so does that mean you don't even have a PS3, if that's the case, then like what I said before on my other post, your being BIASED.

WOW i didnt no this was going to be a hit i thought it would have been axed, but since it hasn't this my reasons for ps3 being the best
1. Plays blu-ray
2. I'm online which is free ( PM me if u want my account, though i only play COD BO )
3. U can go on facebook with it, ive changed my ps3 into my computer just put a mouse and keyboard and ur done
And 4. the reason why PS3 is da best..... because it is thats why

Xbox: Better online and controllers.

PS3: Everything else.

---

Thanks Kai-V!
Member of The Prodigies - Professional Beyblade Team

^ You clearly did not read the OP well enough; you sorta have to state why you like 360 over the PS3.

As for me, I grow quite weary of this topic, as I've seen it many a time. Personally, I don't find the PS3 superior or inferior to the 360, and vice-versa. A lot of the games are shared between both consoles as mentioned in a previous post(s), and I equally like the exclusives for both consoles.

They're both great systems to own, although I only have a PS3.

---

Thank you Pyro for this sick sig~!!

Okay, well Halo and Gears of War are only the best exclusives for Xbox, the only one I would actually consider to be a good Xbox exclusive is Forza, and to be honest, Gran Turismo and Wipe Out are better. I would like to see you name at least 10-15 exclusives on Xbox that were GOOD.
And wow, how unoriginal of people bashing PS because it went down, it wasn't entirely PS fault, I mean sure, their online security is bad, but the hackers are just greedy carps. Plus if you probably think about it, they hacked PSN after the earthquake, so Sony probably had a hard time fixing the Network because of their server or equipment that got messed up during the earthquake, like that is so pathetic of people bashing Sony because of that, what if Xbox went down? How would the fanboys react?
So Microsoft charges players so that Microsoft workers make money? Sony doesn't charge players to Sony workers make money.
Plus you said that you have a Xbox console, so does that mean you don't even have a PS3, if that's the case, then like what I said before on my other post, your being BIASED.

Good Xbox 360 Exclusives
Halo
FEAR
Saints Row
Limbo
Gears of War
Crackdown
Shadow Complete 
Splosion Man
Naruto: Rise of a Ninja
Fable
Dead Rising
Alan Wake
Dead or Alive 4
Forza
Perfect Dark Zero
Geometry Wars: Retro Evolved 2
Kameo: Elements of Power
Naruto: The Broken Bond

Learn to read and stop being such a Sony tool. I said they were EQUAL I didn't say 360 was better, so how does a bias even facto into my post? If XBL went down for a month thy then Microsoft would lose fanboys and customers just like Sony, don't act like anything different would have happened. Sony fanboys would be talking carp about the 360 for the next ten years. Everyone is biased about everything, it's a fact of life.

---

this is dumb, anyone can make up an obscure question with not enough logical hints to lead to an answer
that's not a riddle, it's a waste of time

This is of my favorite Brad quotes from the good old days (Click to View)

...

It's a plastic model. You really don't want me to answer that question. rofl

Hi Roan,

It seems that you've accidentally found yourself in a topic you're not at all interested in. Please click http://forums.beywiki.com to return to the forums index.

Thanks,

Tamer Brad
Beywiki.com Staff