+- World Beyblade Organization by Fighting Spirits Inc. (https://worldbeyblade.org)
+-- Forum: Beyblade Discussion (https://worldbeyblade.org/Forum-Beyblade-Discussion)
+--- Forum: Beyblade Customizations (https://worldbeyblade.org/Forum-Beyblade-Customizations)
+---- Forum: Zero-G/Shogun Steel Customizations (https://worldbeyblade.org/Forum-Zero-G-Shogun-Steel-Customizations)
+---- Thread: Zero-G Sway Attack: SA165 vs. E230 vs. SP230 (/Thread-Zero-G-Sway-Attack-SA165-vs-E230-vs-SP230)
Zero-G Sway Attack: SA165 vs. E230 vs. SP230 - ShinobuXD - Apr. 06, 2013
So, I made this thread to find out which of these tracks was best for sway, or if they were equal. Since the results will be close, we need tests from lots of others, too. Hopefully this will help get everything closer to a ZG tier list.
The opponents- The attacker MSF-L Goreim Wyvang SA165(Zero-G Attack)/E230(Lower/Upper)/SP230 GCF will be used for me. People don't have to use this exact combo, preferably just something like Synchrom CF/GCF.
The defender is my own benchmark- MF-H Diablo Kerbecs TH170 WB. This combo isn't too hard to sway, but also not too easy. I feel WB is great for benchmarking sway.
Tests
SA165 Attacker vs WB Defender
SA165:8 Wins(5 0GKO, 3 KO)
WB:12 Wins(7 0GKO, 4 OS, 1 KO)
1 Tie
SA165 Win Rate: 40%
E230 Attacker(Lower Mode) vs WB Defender
E230: 8 Wins(5 0GKO, 3 KO)
WB: 12 Wins(5 0GKO, 4 KO, 3 OS)
E230 Win Rate: 40%
SP230 Attacker vs WB Defender
SP230: 7 Wins(All 0GKO)
WB: 13 Wins(7 OS, 5 0GKO, 1 KO)
1 Tie
SP230 Win Rate:35%
E230 Attacker(Upper Mode) vs WB Defender
E230: 9 Wins(9 0GKO)
WB: 11 Wins(6 0GKO, 4 OS, 1 KO
E230 Win Rate: 45%
RE: Zero-G Sway Attack: SA165 vs. E230 vs. SP230 - Yami - Apr. 06, 2013
Hmm would you try E230 Upper mode? Usually it more effective than lower.
RE: Zero-G Sway Attack: SA165 vs. E230 vs. SP230 - Izhkoort - Apr. 06, 2013
If I have time I will do MSF Balro Balro _______GCF vs Revizer Revizer E230___
I'm thinking what tip, if someone wants me to test one, tell me and I will do it (the first to answer me)
RE: Zero-G Sway Attack: SA165 vs. E230 vs. SP230 - Yuko Ray14 - Apr. 06, 2013
I'm not a genius on zero-g but I do own a stadium and kinda understand how it works, but would it be better if u used a tip like GF, I mean if you truly want to see the actual swaying should use a tip that does not interfere with the pure swaying of the track.
RE: Zero-G Sway Attack: SA165 vs. E230 vs. SP230 - Yami - Apr. 06, 2013
Yeah GF it mainly known as best tip if GCF/CF isn't available to them.
RE: Zero-G Sway Attack: SA165 vs. E230 vs. SP230 - ShinobuXD - Apr. 06, 2013
I know, but we're trying to see how well the track works with the bottom in sway, not how well it works by itself.
RE: Zero-G Sway Attack: SA165 vs. E230 vs. SP230 - Yuko Ray14 - Apr. 06, 2013
Ohh ok I thought you were purely testing tracks, sorry
RE: Zero-G Sway Attack: SA165 vs. E230 vs. SP230 - Izhkoort - Apr. 06, 2013
I forgot, I can't test SP230... but well I can test SA165 and E230 anyway
RE: Zero-G Sway Attack: SA165 vs. E230 vs. SP230 - ShinobuXD - Apr. 06, 2013
Yeah, that'd still be great!
RE: Zero-G Sway Attack: SA165 vs. E230 vs. SP230 - BeybladePants11 - Apr. 06, 2013
So it looks like it is a tie between SA165 and E230. Unfortunately, I can only do E230 tests since it's the only track I have that is included in these tests. Is it still fine? Nice tests too.
RE: Zero-G Sway Attack: SA165 vs. E230 vs. SP230 - ShinobuXD - Apr. 06, 2013
Yep, that would still be fantastic.
E230 in upper mode is quite good, too. I updated the OP with results for it.
RE: Zero-G Sway Attack: SA165 vs. E230 vs. SP230 - Izhkoort - Apr. 08, 2013
Sorry guys, I started testing but I erased them... so I didn't actually completed the tests because I was pretty annoyed...