(Aug. 10, 2017  2:36 PM)Bastillon Wrote:

(Aug. 10, 2017  2:26 PM)Kai-V Wrote: ~Mana~ posted some highly contrasting results in the Legend Spriggan topic, from what I recall. Always look at all tests posted in a topic, not just those in the first message.

This would be terribly inefficient for test results with way too many messages, and is also the reason why I try to gather all test results posted in my own threads into the OP. No one likes to scroll through multiple pages just to scramble for one critical test result, and this is exactly the problem with the competitive burst combo thread.
Back on topic, I'm a bit skeptical about lS now, although this is kind of expected given mG's apparently superior position so far. Still, can someone post test results against gK? Although I personally don't have it (and a lot of other people probably don't either), I'm still a bit curious.

(Aug. 11, 2017  12:24 AM)Shaady Wrote: Mana's test results were literally 3 posts below the OP on the first and only page of that thread.

(Aug. 11, 2017  2:05 AM)Bastillon Wrote:

(Aug. 11, 2017  12:24 AM)Shaady Wrote: Mana's test results were literally 3 posts below the OP on the first and only page of that thread.

I know, and I guess I had pretty high hopes on the OP. Apparently, I've overlooked the test result. Still, it's generally not a good arrangement if test results are always separated by multiple messages. It's fine currently, but eventually it'll get really messy.
And as I was looking at the test result, there seems to be two major factors in play here, namely the mold of the chip and the condition of the Xtreme driver. Maybe the launcher has a slight influence, but I doubt it though. Also, it was mentioned in the OP that lS7VX had been successful in tournaments and presumably scoring a lot of good hits against mG. Judging from the video from 1234beyblade and Mana's test results, the main problem seems to be a worn Xtreme driver. They'll have to try a different launch angle if they want to score good hits against mG. Not sure if TrainiacJ's chip mold is especially weak or anything, but I'd say that this is the only solid test result available. However, for tournament play, I think the other two test results would be better, since not everyone has the best launch angles and there are a lot of other factors in play.

(Aug. 11, 2017  4:30 AM)Shaady Wrote: I'm sorry but it is not the responsibility of the thread creator to go through and list the test results of other contributors in their OP. If you don't want to be bothered reading through all the contributions to a thread then you have no right to complain about missing information. BTW the mold of the chip was not a factor affecting Mana's test results as she was using the stock mG god chip as was TraniacJ.

(Aug. 03, 2017  8:28 PM)~Mana~ Wrote: Legend Spriggan 7Vortex Xtreme (Right) vs Maximum Garuda 4Glaive Atomic
lS: 0OS, 3KO, 1 BF (4 total wins)
mG: 15OS, 0KO, 1 BF (16 total wins)
lS Winning Percentage: 20%
(Bursts caused by KOs have been marked as KOs)

(Aug. 11, 2017  11:48 PM)TL14 Wrote: Can somebody please test Maximum Garuda and Alter Chronos with Guard?

(Aug. 11, 2017  11:58 PM)TrainiacJ Wrote: I've gone back and done a couple rounds of I27VX against mG4GAt, and I've found I2 is capable of bursting mG consistantly. I'll post a proper scored test some time soon, but I figured I should man up and test I2 despite the breakage risk, haha.

(Aug. 11, 2017  11:48 PM)TL14 Wrote: Can somebody please test Maximum Garuda and Alter Chronos with Guard?

I am planning on doing tests for Guard and the rest of the new August parts, it's just a matter of when they arrive here. I think Guard would work well for them though...

(Jul. 29, 2017  7:59 PM)Kai-V Wrote: For sure, whoever disliked Zero-G for the supposed "power creeps" it had, this is clearly way worse. It makes you want to already not buy Maximum Garuda because you know it will have to be banned anyway. So, worse interest in the game, and stupidity in the creation process...

(Aug. 18, 2017  6:33 PM)TL14 Wrote: JESUS CRACKERS!!! The metagame is sooooo broken right now. Seriously. I just found out the most metagame breaking combo ever. It's Maximum Garuda 4-Glaive Guard. I wanted to try Guard out on MG since its leak and here you go. It won 20 to 0 against Alter Chronos 7-Meteor Atomic and there was only one double spin finish. I didn't even have to weak launch or use a different God Chip on Maximum Garuda. It never bursted... ever!!! Maximum Garuda is soo op. I will be posting more battle results soon.

(Aug. 18, 2017  6:41 PM)Kei Wrote:

(Aug. 18, 2017  6:33 PM)TL14 Wrote: JESUS CRACKERS!!! The metagame is sooooo broken right now. Seriously. I just found out the most metagame breaking combo ever. It's Maximum Garuda 4-Glaive Guard. I wanted to try Guard out on MG since its leak and here you go. It won 20 to 0 against Alter Chronos 7-Meteor Atomic and there was only one double spin finish. I didn't even have to weak launch or use a different God Chip on Maximum Garuda. It never bursted... ever!!! Maximum Garuda is soo op. I will be posting more battle results soon.

I don't have Guard yet, but I can't imagine Guardian Kerbeus Heavy Revolve losing to Maximum Garuda 4 Glaive Guard.

7 Meteor also isn't the best disk for Alter Chronos (I would say 4 Glaive or 2 Cross is), but in any case, mG is known to be able to OS aC.

(Aug. 18, 2017  6:41 PM)Kei Wrote:

(Aug. 18, 2017  6:33 PM)TL14 Wrote: JESUS CRACKERS!!! The metagame is sooooo broken right now. Seriously. I just found out the most metagame breaking combo ever. It's Maximum Garuda 4-Glaive Guard. I wanted to try Guard out on MG since its leak and here you go. It won 20 to 0 against Alter Chronos 7-Meteor Atomic and there was only one double spin finish. I didn't even have to weak launch or use a different God Chip on Maximum Garuda. It never bursted... ever!!! Maximum Garuda is soo op. I will be posting more battle results soon.

I don't have Guard yet, but I can't imagine Guardian Kerbeus Heavy Revolve losing to Maximum Garuda 4 Glaive Guard.

7 Meteor also isn't the best disk for Alter Chronos (I would say 4 Glaive or 2 Cross is), but in any case, mG is known to be able to OS aC.

(Aug. 18, 2017  8:46 PM)TrainiacJ Wrote:

(Aug. 18, 2017  6:41 PM)Kei Wrote: I don't have Guard yet, but I can't imagine Guardian Kerbeus Heavy Revolve losing to Maximum Garuda 4 Glaive Guard.

7 Meteor also isn't the best disk for Alter Chronos (I would say 4 Glaive or 2 Cross is), but in any case, mG is known to be able to OS aC.

Yeah, Guardian Kerbeus on Revolve can very easily outspin Maximum Garuda on Guard, especially considering Guard isn't too great to begin with...

• After seeing that Nashizoku video, I knew this had to be tested with actual competitive parts as opposed to the stock combos used in that video.
  
• I used Trans in the first test because I had aC disassembled at the time and I think it worked alright. I used Iron because I needed to test it anyway. TBH I think these results could be replicated with Accel, Zephyr, or maybe even Reboot too.
  
• I used 2 because... actually I didn't have a reason, lol. Vortex I felt would work better than Meteor here because Vortex is three-sided. I'm sure you could get better results with 7Vortex, but I only have one 7, so... :^).
  
• I made sure to weak launch mG, too. Also, I'm not sure if this is public knowledge yet, but 7 is better than 4 for stamina. So that's one for the Wikis, I guess...
  
• E2 being a hard counter to mG feels like a cosmic joke.
  

(Oct. 09, 2017  5:38 PM)FIREFIRE CPB Wrote: what do you mean by Cosmic joke? though thanks for test. does E2 works against aC too?

(Oct. 09, 2017  5:15 PM)TrainiacJ Wrote: [*]I made sure to weak launch mG, too, just in case you're a tryhard and care about that. Also, I'm not sure if this is public knowledge yet, but 7 is better than 4 for stamina. So that's one for the Wikis, I guess...

(Oct. 09, 2017  5:52 PM)Rebel Blader Wrote:

(Oct. 09, 2017  5:15 PM)TrainiacJ Wrote: [*]I made sure to weak launch mG, too, just in case you're a tryhard and care about that. Also, I'm not sure if this is public knowledge yet, but 7 is better than 4 for stamina. So that's one for the Wikis, I guess...

[*]
this is a huge shock till now i thought and also wrote in some drafts that stamina wise 4/8 is superior to 7.could u test 4 8 and 7 for stamina to compare the,m and tell us which disk is best for pure stamina.

(Oct. 09, 2017  7:00 PM)TrainiacJ Wrote: [*]7 > 4 > 8. I don't think 8 is worth testing since it bursts more than 4 and 7, but 7 outclasses 4 for spin time and also has good burst resistance. So not only is 7 the best disc for attack, but also the best for everything else. It's basically a Heavy that can wear a hat.

what a balanced metagame

(Oct. 09, 2017  7:10 PM)Rebel Blader Wrote:

(Oct. 09, 2017  7:00 PM)TrainiacJ Wrote: [*]7 > 4 > 8. I don't think 8 is worth testing since it bursts more than 4 and 7, but 7 outclasses 4 for spin time and also has good burst resistance. So not only is 7 the best disc for attack, but also the best for everything else. It's basically a Heavy that can wear a hat.

what a balanced metagame

[*]

Yea but this case is worse heavy was outclaswed by spread knuckle and gravity for stamina but 7 is just too op.does 7 has better stamina due to the fact it has more owd?also i heard that 7 bursts more than 4 is it true?