+- World Beyblade Organization by Fighting Spirits Inc. (https://worldbeyblade.org)
+-- Forum: Beyblade Discussion (https://worldbeyblade.org/Forum-Beyblade-Discussion)
+--- Forum: Beyblade Customizations (https://worldbeyblade.org/Forum-Beyblade-Customizations)
+---- Forum: Metal Fight Customizations (https://worldbeyblade.org/Forum-Metal-Fight-Customizations)
+---- Thread: The Ultimate Destabilizer Storm Cancer 100WB (with good tests) (/Thread-The-Ultimate-Destabilizer-Storm-Cancer-100WB-with-good-tests)
RE: Storm Cancer 100WB - Dan - Dec. 30, 2010
I never said anything like that.
In that case though: 'don't compare WB with RF, R2F or LRF please in Attack..'
RE: Storm Cancer 100WB - Ricko - Dec. 30, 2010
(Dec. 30, 2010 4:32 AM)Dan Wrote: I never said anything like that.
i never did that.. but WB or SF are better than RF in this case..cause RF = very poor stamina
destabilizing it´s a balance combo combining two types Stamina/Attack Storm have attack.. WB have the stamina and attack i need.. the lower track it´s just perfect to get under the opponent..
the results are that tests.. pure and simple...
RE: Storm Cancer 100WB - lord Wolfblade - Dec. 30, 2010
(Dec. 30, 2010 4:37 AM)Flame Lion Wrote: WB have the stamina
wb has little stamina (though more than rf, and hf/f?)
RE: Storm Cancer 100WB - Ricko - Dec. 30, 2010
(Dec. 30, 2010 4:39 AM)lord Wolfblade Wrote:(Dec. 30, 2010 4:37 AM)Flame Lion Wrote: WB have the stamina
wb has little stamina (though more than rf, and hf/f?)
more than SF too.. i think it´s not little stamina.. WB has stamina..
RE: Storm Cancer 100WB - Dan - Dec. 30, 2010
WB has fine stamina, no doubt about that. It is very close to CS'.
RE: Storm Cancer 100WB - Bluezee - Dec. 30, 2010
(Dec. 30, 2010 4:37 AM)Flame Lion Wrote:(Dec. 30, 2010 4:32 AM)Dan Wrote: I never said anything like that.
i never did that.. but WB or SF are better than RF in this case..cause RF = very poor stamina
destabilizing it´s a balance combo combining two types Stamina/Attack Storm have attack.. WB have the stamina and attack i need.. the lower track it´s just perfect to get under the opponent..
the results are that tests.. pure and simple...
Here is what you are not understanding that we are trying to express to you. WB IS NOT AN ATTACK BOTTOM. It may have attack capabilities due to the fact that it gets worn down, but it does not mean in any way, shape or form that it is an attack bottom similar to RF, R2F, CS, WF, F, HF, XF, LF, LRF, or anything in the attack based catagories.
RE: Storm Cancer 100WB - Gearfried97 - Dec. 30, 2010
edit: nvm
RE: Storm Cancer 100WB - Ricko - Dec. 30, 2010
(Dec. 30, 2010 4:42 AM)Bluezee Wrote:(Dec. 30, 2010 4:37 AM)Flame Lion Wrote:(Dec. 30, 2010 4:32 AM)Dan Wrote: I never said anything like that.
i never did that.. but WB or SF are better than RF in this case..cause RF = very poor stamina
destabilizing it´s a balance combo combining two types Stamina/Attack Storm have attack.. WB have the stamina and attack i need.. the lower track it´s just perfect to get under the opponent..
the results are that tests.. pure and simple...
Here is what you are not understanding that we are trying to express to you. WB IS NOT AN ATTACK BOTTOM. It may have attack capabilities due to the fact that it gets worn down, but it does not mean in any way, shape or form that it is an attack bottom similar to RF, R2F, CS, WF, F, HF, XF, LF, LRF, or anything in the attack based catagories.
seriously are you kidding me?? i know it´s not!!i´m just saying that but he has attack(much more compared to WD...)! i know he has defense! he is a former top tier defense!
(Dec. 30, 2010 4:42 AM)Red_Eyes_Zombie Wrote: edit: nvm
who´s that?
RE: Storm Cancer 100WB - Gearfried97 - Dec. 30, 2010
(Dec. 30, 2010 4:45 AM)Flame Lion Wrote:(Dec. 30, 2010 4:42 AM)Red_Eyes_Zombie Wrote: edit: nvm
who´s that?
huh? who's what?
RE: Storm Cancer 100WB - Dan - Dec. 30, 2010
All the guy is trying to say is that in this case, WB holds some early-onset attack capabilities, for a short time. I think we are going too hard on him.. :[
RE: Storm Cancer 100WB - Bluezee - Dec. 30, 2010
Understandable. My apologies Flame Lion. I just did not want there to be any confusion amongst us.
RE: Storm Cancer 100WB - Ricko - Dec. 30, 2010
(Dec. 30, 2010 4:47 AM)Dan Wrote: All the guy is trying to say is that in this case, WB holds some early-onset attack capabilities, for a short time. I think we are going too hard on him.. :[
thanks Dan.. i was very happy because i founded a good combo.. and a good option like WB and i put my tests.. what you want from me now? i never said WB it´s an attack type bottom..i know very well that it´s defense so stop.. WB has what i want to this combo some movement and the necessary stamina..
(Dec. 30, 2010 4:50 AM)Bluezee Wrote: Understandable. My apologies Flame Lion. I just did not want there to be any confusion amongst us.
thanks no problem..
RE: Storm Cancer 100WB - Dan - Dec. 30, 2010
We don't want anything, man. Just keep testing.
RE: Storm Cancer 100WB - Gearfried97 - Dec. 30, 2010
(Dec. 30, 2010 4:51 AM)Flame Lion Wrote: i never said WB it´s an attack type bottom..
sorry to be all nit-picky, but you did say exactly that...
(Dec. 30, 2010 4:51 AM)Flame Lion Wrote: WB it´s an attack bottom
RE: Storm Cancer 100WB - Ricko - Dec. 30, 2010
(Dec. 30, 2010 4:55 AM)Red_Eyes_Zombie Wrote:(Dec. 30, 2010 4:51 AM)Flame Lion Wrote: i never said WB it´s an attack type bottom..
sorry to be all nit-picky, but you did say exactly that...
(Dec. 30, 2010 4:51 AM)Flame Lion Wrote: WB it´s an attack bottom
lool you´re only showing part of the post.. and if i said that( what i doubt) my mistake.. you can´t stop? get back on topic
sorry for doublepost but i put a note on my first post about WB just to make sure no one thinks i´m dumb and i don´t know wb it´s defense..
RE: The Ultimate Destabilizer Storm Cancer 100WB (with good tests) - Yami - Dec. 30, 2010
Weight on Storm Wheel? it Almost Sound like a Light Weight Wheel for a destabilizer
RE: The Ultimate Destabilizer Storm Cancer 100WB (with good tests) - |Joe| - Dec. 30, 2010
Ok so what Stadium was this done in? I don't see it mentioned anywhere.
RE: The Ultimate Destabilizer Storm Cancer 100WB (with good tests) - Ricko - Dec. 30, 2010
(Dec. 30, 2010 9:48 AM)|Joe| Wrote: Ok so what Stadium was this done in? I don't see it mentioned anywhere.
i put the stadium open your eyes
RE: The Ultimate Destabilizer Storm Cancer 100WB (with good tests) - |Joe| - Dec. 31, 2010
Hm must've missed that when I quickly skimmed over the whole thing.
RE: The Ultimate Destabilizer Storm Cancer 100WB (with good tests) - OnePiece - Dec. 31, 2010
does it have to be cancer or can it be gasher
RE: The Ultimate Destabilizer Storm Cancer 100WB (with good tests) - UDC - Dec. 31, 2010
same thing
RE: The Ultimate Destabilizer Storm Cancer 100WB (with good tests) - milkychipz - Dec. 31, 2010
Hmm, UDC is write, except for the small fact that Hasbro Gasher is heavier than bull, at 3.59G...
RE: The Ultimate Destabilizer Storm Cancer 100WB (with good tests) - UDC - Dec. 31, 2010
(Dec. 31, 2010 3:16 PM)littlechipz Wrote: Hmm, UDC is write, except for the small fact that Hasbro Gasher is heavier than bull, at 3.59G...I am sensing sarcasm~
anyways, ill try to test this agaisnt an attack type.
RE: Storm Cancer 100WB - AxBlader - Dec. 31, 2010
(Dec. 30, 2010 4:23 AM)Dan Wrote: Storm does not have a lack of stamina, in fact, it is pretty darn light.I agree
RE: The Ultimate Destabilizer Storm Cancer 100WB (with good tests) - Laserdude - Dec. 31, 2010
flame lion i hate to tell you this but that combo
1.is only versing earth and burn which really arent good at all
2. i bet guys like gravity perseus and guys like him could crush that combo