(Apr. 21, 2020  6:19 PM)Darkhelmz Wrote:
https://www.instagram.com/p/B_QDR-tlQUh/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link
This is my Photoshopped concept for the new Fafnir that's coming out. I noticed how the shape was very similar to the Giest fafnir concept that we got a long time ago, so i used that along with the teaser to create this.

(Apr. 23, 2020  9:20 AM)originalzankye Wrote:

(Apr. 23, 2020  9:32 AM)Needforspeed Wrote: My wallet has already died twice will this be worth, back to the topic seems like fafnir now has some hinges in the layer

(Apr. 24, 2020  12:48 AM)I MagikHorse Wrote:

(Apr. 23, 2020  9:32 AM)Needforspeed Wrote: My wallet has already died twice will this be worth, back to the topic seems like fafnir now has some hinges in the layer

Where exactly are you seeing hinges?

(Apr. 24, 2020  1:48 AM)Needforspeed Wrote:

(Apr. 24, 2020  12:48 AM)I MagikHorse Wrote: Where exactly are you seeing hinges?

Ooops i meant weird shapes at 00.59

(Apr. 26, 2020  5:19 AM)Orbit Wrote: Yes, but Xcalius is something TT would do. There would probably be metal on the sword, and even on the chip because part of the sword is there, but the chip would have horrible Burst resistance to balance it, because now we know the chip affects burst resistance. It also works with my theory, The attack type single chassis will be unbalanced, and for xcalius it makes sense for most of the weight to be on one side. Plus, Xcalius has always had a gimmick where the disk lines up with the sword, and having a single chassis allows that to be possible if it’s stock comes out with the triple booster like last time with dread bahamut. Xcalius is just something that TT would do and makes sence to have a single chassis.

(Apr. 26, 2020  6:58 PM)Orbit Wrote: How? The body of the sword would be in the chip while the tip and handle of it would be in the ring,  The chip would have bad burst resistance to make up for the metal, and the sparking chip core would be like the god chip.

(Apr. 26, 2020  7:13 PM)BuilderROB Wrote:

(Apr. 26, 2020  6:58 PM)Orbit Wrote: How? The body of the sword would be in the chip while the tip and handle of it would be in the ring,  The chip would have bad burst resistance to make up for the metal, and the sparking chip core would be like the god chip.

Because there is customization. Think about how weird it would look on other beyblades. Why do you think they chose Prime Apocalypse to not be customized? That is why.

(Apr. 26, 2020  7:32 PM)g2_ Wrote:

(Apr. 26, 2020  7:13 PM)BuilderROB Wrote: Because there is customization. Think about how weird it would look on other beyblades. Why do you think they chose Prime Apocalypse to not be customized? That is why.

Prime Apocalypse A5 can be customized.

(Apr. 26, 2020  7:33 PM)BuilderROB Wrote:

(Apr. 26, 2020  7:32 PM)g2_ Wrote: Prime Apocalypse A5 can be customized.

Hasbro...doesn’t really care how their Beyblades look. I think that is kind of obvious by how the Hypersphere Beyblades look.

(Apr. 26, 2020  7:32 PM)g2_ Wrote:

(Apr. 26, 2020  7:13 PM)BuilderROB Wrote: Because there is customization. Think about how weird it would look on other beyblades. Why do you think they chose Prime Apocalypse to not be customized? That is why.

Prime Apocalypse A5 can be customized.

(Apr. 28, 2020  8:05 AM)BladerGem Wrote:

(Apr. 26, 2020  7:32 PM)g2_ Wrote: Prime Apocalypse A5 can be customized.

That may be, but I highly doubt that it has the Mugen lock. It only makes sense that it would have an interchangable chip, considering Hasbro's utter hatred of any gimmick, even one as simple as having rubber in a layer.

• The green names are for Avatars that are already 100% confirmed to be in the current series (the 8 beys from the RT campaign + the four new Avatars that we've seen/know exist so far)
  
• The yellow names are for Avatars that could be reintroduced into Superking with no issues (unless new Avatars are introduced that conflict with their initials).
  
• The orange names are in the same boat as the yellow names, but because of the initialization scheme used for the chips (first letter + next consonant), they share the same initials as another unconfirmed Avatar (Chaos and Chronos are both Ch, etc.), so only one from each pair can be reintroduced under this scheme.
  
• The red names are unconfirmed Avatars with initials that conflict with confirmed Avatars, and would thus be impossible to bring back with either recycling the same initials (creating the exact type of confusion these two-letter initials were designed to eliminate) or if they changed the initialization scheme in order to accommodate that specific Avatar (which would make having any kind of system completely arbitrary).
  
• The blue names are names that are otherwise possible to be reintroduced, but have weird questions surrounding them. Specifically, how would the Artemis/Apollos/Aeclipse gimmick work with such small plastic parts that would be unwise to make split apart? How would Gaia be initialed under this scheme considering it's the only Avatar with no consonants in its name besides the first letter of the name? 
  

(Apr. 29, 2020  5:53 PM)BuilderROB Wrote: I honestly doubt we are getting any returning beyblades from the dual or God era unless it comes in a Random Layer product. I would hope for maybe Regulus or Chronos in a Random Layer as the prize or maybe Kerbeus or Deathscyther. Those last two would be great to see but probably unlikely considering the brought back Odin over those two back in GT.

(Apr. 21, 2020  6:19 PM)Darkhelmz Wrote:
https://www.instagram.com/p/B_QDR-tlQUh/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link
This is my Photoshopped concept for the new Fafnir that's coming out. I noticed how the shape was very similar to the Giest fafnir concept that we got a long time ago, so i used that along with the teaser to create this.