World Beyblade Organization by Fighting Spirits Inc.
Errors on the wiki ??? - Printable Version

+- World Beyblade Organization by Fighting Spirits Inc. (https://worldbeyblade.org)
+-- Forum: Beyblade Discussion (https://worldbeyblade.org/Forum-Beyblade-Discussion)
+--- Forum: Beyblade Wiki (https://worldbeyblade.org/Forum-Beyblade-Wiki)
+--- Thread: Errors on the wiki ??? (/Thread-Errors-on-the-wiki)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48


RE: Errors on the wiki ??? - Dan - Jul. 06, 2011

(Jul. 06, 2011  10:50 PM)poseidon Wrote: It lacks decent info.tbh.tje ar is wway better than what iy is desribing

I'm guessing you shouldn't do it.
By the way, I'm certain that the upper mode of Lightning LDrago is when the plastic is over the 'ramp' parts of Lightning. The BeyWiki says that having the CW over the 3 'claws' is upper mode, but I think that is Multi-Hit. Even more, I doubted myself so I tested each mode and having the plastic over the ramps leads to more smash attack while over the claws it is more passive..
What the..?


RE: Errors on the wiki ??? - Kai-V - Jul. 07, 2011

(Jul. 06, 2011  10:30 PM)Dan Wrote: Does anyone else find the beywiki article for Dragoon G is a bit lacking? It might as well not be there. I mean, even Bumpking's AR has a chunkier explanation.. :V I know nothing about the bey which is why I went to the wiki, so I cannot write one myself.

Hahah, I have a true joke to tell you : it was added in April, by people from Beyblade Wikia hah.

The true stereotype lives on. Forever.



Let me verify Lightning L Drago's modes.

EDIT : The modes on Beywiki, illustrated by the photographs, are correct.


RE: Errors on the wiki ??? - Dan - Jul. 07, 2011

You are certain..?
I find that strange, very strange.


RE: Errors on the wiki ??? - Kai-V - Jul. 07, 2011

(Jul. 07, 2011  3:38 AM)Dan Wrote: You are certain..?
I find that strange, very strange.

I checked with TAKARA-TOMY's website.


RE: Errors on the wiki ??? - TimelessOne - Jul. 11, 2011

An error:
In the artical for light wheels, it says that that the heat light wheel is the plastic version of flame.However, it looks nothing like flame and more like libra.
Correct me if im wrong.


RE: Errors on the wiki ??? - Kai-V - Jul. 11, 2011

(Jul. 11, 2011  9:23 AM)qwertxj3 Wrote: An error:
In the artical for light wheels, it says that that the heat light wheel is the plastic version of flame.However, it looks nothing like flame and more like libra.
Correct me if im wrong.

Yes, an idiot had edited it. It used to be written "Infinity", not "Flame".


RE: Errors on the wiki ??? - TimelessOne - Jul. 12, 2011

K. edited it for you! Wink


RE: Errors on the wiki ??? - Kai-V - Jul. 12, 2011

(Jul. 12, 2011  4:53 AM)qwertxj3 Wrote: K. edited it for you! Wink

I had already edited it ...


RE: Errors on the wiki ??? - TimelessOne - Jul. 12, 2011

What?! It said flame!!!EDIT: It dosn't show you on the history page....
http://wiki.worldbeyblade.org/index.php?title=Light_Wheel&action=history


RE: Errors on the wiki ??? - Kai-V - Jul. 12, 2011

(Jul. 12, 2011  6:52 AM)qwertxj3 Wrote: What?! It said flame!!!EDIT: It dosn't show you on the history page....
http://wiki.worldbeyblade.org/index.php?title=Light_Wheel&action=history

Hm, that is odd. I was sure I had pressed "Submit" and everything ...


RE: Errors on the wiki ??? - Robsta - Jul. 13, 2011

Not really an error but more a lack of information. Under the Galeon article it's missing the Random Booster 6 light blue version in the "other versions" section.


RE: Errors on the wiki ??? - Kei - Jul. 13, 2011

(Jul. 13, 2011  1:22 AM)Robsta Wrote: Not really an error but more a lack of information. Under the Galeon article it's missing the Random Booster 6 light blue version in the "other versions" section.

Then go ahead and add it!

You know, now that I think about it ... we should get some articles up for the plastics RBs.


RE: Errors on the wiki ??? - Blitz Unicorno - Jul. 19, 2011

Wind Aquario 100HF/S Beywiki Article Wrote:One of the exceptions to the rule of using 85/90 over 100 is in Ray Unicorno 100RF. It is a former Attack customization; and has been proven through testing to allow Ray to more effectively utilize its Smash Attack capabilities.

I changed that to "It is a former Attack top tier customization", it is still an attack customization lol.
Also changed Ray Unicorno 100RF to Ray Unicorno 100RF/R2F.

Another error: Wind Aquario 100HF/S's 100 has a different writeup than Lightning L Drago 100HF's 100. IMO we should change that for consistency.


RE: Errors on the wiki ??? - th!nk - Jul. 24, 2011

Mm, still doesn't read perfectly, I'll have a look at it when I have time.

Also, D's description is outdated, It's stated that it is outclassed by WD and SD, which it pretty much never was, and it also performs better on 230, as I'm sure you know. :\


RE: Errors on the wiki ??? - Janstarblast - Jul. 25, 2011

Not really an error, but in the Dragoon Fantom wiki, one of the Hasbro recolors has not been mentioned.
Its the Orange-Yellow recolor. Dunno if its important to add or not, but yeah!


RE: Errors on the wiki ??? - th!nk - Jul. 25, 2011

Hm. Do you have a picture at all so we can work out what series it is? If not, is it a single colour, and is it metallic?
Or has anyone identified the series?


RE: Errors on the wiki ??? - Janstarblast - Jul. 25, 2011

Well, I own this bey that's why I know...
Um, its ugly. Tongue_out
Back on topic, here's the pic-
http://worldbeyblade.org/Thread-Beyblade-Collection?pid=604752#pid604752
Quite a bit of brainstorming here...
In Nitro's collection, please open the pic saying plastics.
In that, the second bey in the second line is the orange-yellow recolor. I hope this helped.
Well, when I bought it, I remember buying it from a differentiated lot of beys, named BBA Exclusives.
From there, I got the above mentioned bey, and a Red-Gold Master Dranzer.
But as it was in India(who knows, it might be a technique to sell them. Somewhat of a tricky stock clearanceTongue_out ), I can't be sure that it was actually a BBA exclusive or not.... But yes, the AR comes with a good looking BBA mark on it.


RE: Errors on the wiki ??? - th!nk - Jul. 25, 2011

Yep, Hyperblades series, all of them were hideous. I'll add it.


RE: Errors on the wiki ??? - Janstarblast - Jul. 25, 2011

(Jul. 25, 2011  4:36 PM)th!nk Wrote: Yep, Hyperblades series, all of them were hideous. I'll add it.

Great! Well, got to learn something.. Finally I know that the series was known as Hyperblades. Thanks, th!nk.
Yes, they were too bad.... Wonder why Hasbro even tries to recolor parts....


RE: Errors on the wiki ??? - th!nk - Jul. 25, 2011

They were meant to look good/blend while spinning. That said, even with my horrible taste as a kid, I thought they were hideous.


RE: Errors on the wiki ??? - Janstarblast - Jul. 27, 2011

Um, considering the recent tests of some decent parts, I think the Vulcan Horuseus article needs changes...
First of all, I think we must mention that Vulcan has been outclassed...
Then, in the D bottom section, we might add another combo to 'Use in Stamina Customization'.
Its about Basalt___230D... (I am not sure about Metal Wheel)
I think that this is required, but yeah, its upon you all to decide whether its actually important or not...


RE: Errors on the wiki ??? - th!nk - Jul. 27, 2011

A whole bunch of things need updating TBH. Ehhh.


RE: Errors on the wiki ??? - Raigeko13 - Jul. 27, 2011

Yeah, gotta agree with Janstarblast...
There are some things on the wiki that need to be updated.
What sucks though, is that it's really hard to write it all up once it goes down tier wise I guess.


RE: Errors on the wiki ??? - Janstarblast - Jul. 27, 2011

(Jul. 27, 2011  5:21 PM)Raigeko13 Wrote: Yeah, gotta agree with Janstarblast...
There are some things on the wiki that need to be updated.
What sucks though, is that it's really hard to write it all up once it goes down tier wise I guess.

According to me, you mean to say that why not write it out on BeyWiki once some part has found use or become top tier, etc.
Even I always thought over this matter. But, IMO the reason is right in front of you, but its tough to notice...
Every time a part is tested and it finds some use, there's a lot of discussion over it and almost every other member tries to find a counter to the mentioned combo. Look at Libra... Better alternatives came into existence while it was sleeping(banned). So, parts actually find use/get outclassed overnight IMO... There as just a few parts that stay on for long... So, its kinda time consuming to edit things out again and again...
Keep in mind, this is what 'I' think, so I am not sure...
@th!nk-Well, you are correct... Smile


RE: Errors on the wiki ??? - Blitz Unicorno - Aug. 15, 2011

On every bey's (barring the beys which have a CW/wheel of a horoscope) face section, it is written:
Beywiki Wrote:The face of this beyblade decipts _______, one of the 88 constellations in space.
On the Ray Unicorno face section, it is written:
Ray Unicorno article Wrote:The face of Ray Unicorno decipts Monoceros, one of the 88 constellations in space
Shouldn't it be changed on the Ray Unicorno article to maintain consistency?