+- World Beyblade Organization by Fighting Spirits Inc. (https://worldbeyblade.org)
+-- Forum: Beyblade Discussion (https://worldbeyblade.org/Forum-Beyblade-Discussion)
+--- Forum: Beyblade Products (https://worldbeyblade.org/Forum-Beyblade-Products)
+--- Thread: Product B-92 Starter Sieg Xcalibur.1.Ir (/Thread-Product-B-92-Starter-Sieg-Xcalibur-1-Ir)
RE: B-92 Starter Sieg Xcalibur.1.Ir - 蒼井バルト - Aug. 10, 2017
New image of Sieg Xcalibur!
It will be released with proto-launcher.
![[Image: B_92.png]](https://beyblade.takaratomy.co.jp/category/img/products/B_92.png)
RE: B-92 Starter Sieg Xcalibur.1.Ir - TL14 - Aug. 10, 2017
A protolauncher? Not again!
RE: B-92 Starter Sieg Xcalibur.1.Ir - ptf606 - Aug. 10, 2017
What is the gimmick? And how much stamina do you think iron has?
RE: B-92 Starter Sieg Xcalibur.1.Ir - Suzaku-X - Aug. 10, 2017
(Aug. 10, 2017 1:12 PM)ptf606 Wrote: What is the gimmick? And how much stamina do you think iron has?
Metal sword, and it should be a bit more than Accel.
RE: B-92 Starter Sieg Xcalibur.1.Ir - Bastillon - Aug. 10, 2017
Loved how they named it Sieg Xcalibur, since sieg is deutsch (german) for victory. But the design... yeah. Remember the last time TT used a quadrilateral as a layer? That was essentially W2, and it sucked most of the time. Not exactly convinced that using a rhombus instead of a square here would make a difference.
RE: B-92 Starter Sieg Xcalibur.1.Ir - Makoto16 - Aug. 10, 2017
(Aug. 10, 2017 2:50 PM)Bastillon Wrote: Loved how they named it Sieg Xcalibur, since sieg is deutsch (german) for victory. But the design... yeah. Remember the last time TT used a quadrilateral as a layer? That was essentially W2, and it sucked most of the time. Not exactly convinced that using a rhombus instead of a square here would make a difference.The layer looks good for attack because of its shape. W2 shape wasnt a good defense type shape
RE: B-92 Starter Sieg Xcalibur.1.Ir - Bastillon - Aug. 10, 2017
(Aug. 10, 2017 2:58 PM)Makoto16 Wrote:I'm worried about the high recoil design, considering how most meta layers do not have the same problem. We seriously need a good attack layer right now.(Aug. 10, 2017 2:50 PM)Bastillon Wrote: Loved how they named it Sieg Xcalibur, since sieg is deutsch (german) for victory. But the design... yeah. Remember the last time TT used a quadrilateral as a layer? That was essentially W2, and it sucked most of the time. Not exactly convinced that using a rhombus instead of a square here would make a difference.The layer looks good for attack because of its shape. W2 shape wasnt a good defense type shape
RE: B-92 Starter Sieg Xcalibur.1.Ir - MonoDragon - Aug. 10, 2017
Why do they keep covering up the sword more and more?
RE: B-92 Starter Sieg Xcalibur.1.Ir - Howaitonekon - Aug. 10, 2017
The shape reminds me of good old Manta Diver, which is still one of my favourite ARs from the plastic gen. It had quite some recoil, but worked extremely well on rubber tips. Can't really tell how this design will work out for Burst (and if it will burst easily that way), but I can imagine it being quite good.
RE: B-92 Starter Sieg Xcalibur.1.Ir - CrazyAries - Aug. 10, 2017
(Aug. 10, 2017 3:31 PM)MonoDragon Wrote: Why do they keep covering up the sword more and more?
Perhaps they don't want a beyblade be too much more powerful than other ones...
RE: B-92 Starter Sieg Xcalibur.1.Ir - thoriumRing - Aug. 10, 2017
(Aug. 10, 2017 3:38 PM)CrazyAries Wrote:(Aug. 10, 2017 3:31 PM)MonoDragon Wrote: Why do they keep covering up the sword more and more?
Perhaps they don't want a beyblade be too much more powerful than other ones...
Who wants to play against the top that will ruin yours?
RE: B-92 Starter Sieg Xcalibur.1.Ir - Kai-V - Aug. 10, 2017
(Aug. 10, 2017 3:57 PM)thoriumRing Wrote:(Aug. 10, 2017 3:38 PM)CrazyAries Wrote: Perhaps they don't want a beyblade be too much more powerful than other ones...
Who wants to play against the top that will ruin yours?
If your top is Maximum Garuda, Drain Fafnir, Dark Deathscyther, Deathscyther, etc. then you deserve to be ruined.
RE: B-92 Starter Sieg Xcalibur.1.Ir - BlackSunProphet - Aug. 10, 2017
I mean tbh, the layer looks like a fusion of Xcalibur (single layer) and Xeno Xcalibur (X2), with the added metal. What i mean is. It looks like X2 but with original xcalibur's blade, but with the metal. And i dont dislike that.
What i DO dislike is that even if you modified it to try to remove the front plastic of the blade, there isnt enough metal for a real metal blade, which i think is lame, considering how cool the metal blade would have been without the plastic downgrades. In total: 7.8/10, not enough metal.
RE: B-92 Starter Sieg Xcalibur.1.Ir - Mage - Aug. 10, 2017
Ok sX pretty much looks like a diamond or square
But hey, at least there won't be paint wearing issues
RE: B-92 Starter Sieg Xcalibur.1.Ir - V2KX - Aug. 10, 2017
(Aug. 10, 2017 12:08 PM)蒼井バルト Wrote: New image of Sieg Xcalibur!
It will be released with proto-launcher.
TRIGGERED
RE: B-92 Starter Sieg Xcalibur.1.Ir - Jinbee - Aug. 10, 2017
I love how the shape sort of looks like Manta Diver, hopefully that'll mean it's good.
RE: B-92 Starter Sieg Xcalibur.1.Ir - TL14 - Aug. 10, 2017
Sieg Xcalibur's shape reminds me of a sword combined with a shield.
RE: B-92 Starter Sieg Xcalibur.1.Ir - Suzaku-X - Aug. 10, 2017
Really don't like this one. First, it screams "flashy". Like it is trying to overcompensate for something. WAAAYYY too much gold. Second, this thing blatantly steals L2's and nL's gimmick. Really would have liked a clutch pop-out sword or something, but guess they saved that for Oricalcum? Thirdly, the X in the middle. I agree with TrainiacJ, looks very poorly made. I'd have loved no god chip and just a variation on X2's symbol. The sword doesn't even matter anymore, and this is literally a flashy Manta Diver. 1 looks like Limited. Heck, even TraniacJ made a better 1 disc! Iron is the only reason I even tolerate this release, and even then this should have been on something like nL.
RE: B-92 Starter Sieg Xcalibur.1.Ir - Jinbee - Aug. 10, 2017
(Aug. 10, 2017 11:37 PM)Suzaku-X Wrote: Really don't like this one. First, it screams "flashy". Like it is trying to overcompensate for something. WAAAYYY too much gold. Second, this thing blatantly steals L2's and nL's gimmick. Really would have liked a clutch pop-out sword or something, but guess they saved that for Oricalcum? Thirdly, the X in the middle. I agree with TrainiacJ, looks very poorly made. I'd have loved no god chip and just a variation on X2's symbol. The sword doesn't even matter anymore, and this is literally a flashy Manta Diver. 1 looks like Limited. Heck, even TraniacJ made a better 1 disc! Iron is the only reason I even tolerate this release, and even then this should have been on something like nL.
To be fair, some of TraniacJs concepts tend to be a lot better than what's given to us, especially Guardian Kerbeus' parts...
EDIT: Also the God Chip looks... okay?... But it looks like a very worn tattoo.
RE: B-92 Starter Sieg Xcalibur.1.Ir - Suzaku-X - Aug. 10, 2017
(Aug. 10, 2017 11:48 PM)Jinbee Wrote:(Aug. 10, 2017 11:37 PM)Suzaku-X Wrote: Really don't like this one. First, it screams "flashy". Like it is trying to overcompensate for something. WAAAYYY too much gold. Second, this thing blatantly steals L2's and nL's gimmick. Really would have liked a clutch pop-out sword or something, but guess they saved that for Oricalcum? Thirdly, the X in the middle. I agree with TrainiacJ, looks very poorly made. I'd have loved no god chip and just a variation on X2's symbol. The sword doesn't even matter anymore, and this is literally a flashy Manta Diver. 1 looks like Limited. Heck, even TraniacJ made a better 1 disc! Iron is the only reason I even tolerate this release, and even then this should have been on something like nL.
To be fair, some of TraniacJs concepts tend to be a lot better than what's given to us, especially Guardian Kerbeus' parts...
EDIT: Also the God Chip looks... okay?... But it looks like a very worn tattoo.
TBH the thing that really grinds my gears is that the red is barely visible anymore. Xcalibur screamed "majesty", this screams "overcompensating for a carp release". If the god chip actually connected to the outside, in vein of X2's large X, I'd like it, but this one looks very choppy and akward. I think the Metal God chip would prolly look better here. I don't like this release much tbh.
RE: B-92 Starter Sieg Xcalibur.1.Ir - dragoon398 - Aug. 11, 2017
When will this be released
RE: B-92 Starter Sieg Xcalibur.1.Ir - Kai-V - Aug. 11, 2017
(Aug. 11, 2017 12:31 AM)dragoon398 Wrote: When will this be released
https://worldbeyblade.org/Thread-B-92-Starter-Sieg-Xcalibur-1-Ir?pid=1389172&highlight=September#pid1389172
RE: B-92 Starter Sieg Xcalibur.1.Ir - Bersilus - Aug. 11, 2017
(Aug. 10, 2017 12:55 PM)TL14 Wrote: A protolauncher? Not again!Most God beys come with this since its too pricy now to give a light launcher(plus they want you to buy the light launcher long winder set)
I look forward to this and the new sword launcher
RE: B-92 Starter Sieg Xcalibur.1.Ir - Kai-V - Aug. 11, 2017
Bigger picture of a different angle:
[Image: SiegXcalibur1.jpg]
Also, the Golden Sword version:
[Image: SiegXcalibur_GoldenSwordVer.jpg]
RE: B-92 Starter Sieg Xcalibur.1.Ir - RedRexy0 - Aug. 11, 2017
I think iron will be the burst version of metal flat from mfb