this is going to be a thread about the discussion of who would win between 2-4 beyblade. people can post 2-4 beyblades that would be good for a battle and people can post who they think will win or can actually try out the 2 - 4 beys out of 5 battles. after a certain period of time i will do the math and see who won [ theoretically] then we move on to a next group of beyblades. i will start us off with the two beyblades Burn fireblaze VS. Earth virgo.
usually i will just put a poll but i think its better if you people actually reply if you actually tried the battles.
anime wise or real life wise if your talking about the anime you should have put it in the anime forum
(Jun. 13, 2011 11:29 PM)Epic Blader Wrote: [ -> ]anime wise or real life wise if your talking about the anime you should have put it in the anime forum
judging since he said test, i believe its real life, the thread probably may get closed...
aww really... closed? aww well, too bad! why exactly would it get closed and what classification should i have put it under? this is one of my first threads so feedback helps
Erm... How do I put this? Theoretical battles aren't exactly the way to go. Basically, things like these are easily predicted (MF Gravity Perseus D125R2F vs. Dark Wolf DF145S), or are too hard to predict for Theory to help. (MF Gravity Perseus D125R2F vs. Hell Kerbecs BD145WD) That might be the issue here. (That said, I know little about the metagame anymore, so my examples may not be apt.)
(Jun. 13, 2011 11:39 PM)frost Wrote: [ -> ]aww really... closed? aww well, too bad! why exactly would it get closed and what classification should i have put it under? this is one of my first threads so feedback helps
it might get closed, but i dont know mods decision, classification i think i would put it in off-topic area, thats my opinion tho.
the reason is its more of a chat area than a general area thread, so mods just send it to off-topic if you agree, as the first thread being closed thing can hurt sometimes.
but yeah might be cool to talk about tho, i also believe earth virgo gb145 bs would win.
small note: if you have any concerns you may pm me, but im going bed now
(Jun. 13, 2011 11:46 PM)Megablader9 Wrote: [ -> ]Erm... How do I put this? Theoretical battles aren't exactly the way to go. Basically, things like these are easily predicted (MF Gravity Perseus D125R2F vs. Dark Wolf DF145S), or are too hard to predict for Theory to help. (MF Gravity Perseus D125R2F vs. Hell Kerbecs BD145WD) That might be the issue here. (That said, I know little about the metagame anymore, so my examples may not be apt.)
actually theory battles are strategy, i use it mostly to predict my opponents bey, eg my MF-L Hell Kerbecs BD145 CS i need to use theory to win, other wise your chances are highly slimmed, and yes i do this competitively
(Modes, shot, angles, variants)
it has now occured to me that i may be partially stupid! just kidding, well maybe . alright um, i think there might be alot of things wrong with this thread judging by the comments and posts so what i am just saying is that I [ or people can vote] will pick 2-4 beyblades, then people can put down answers on who would win based on actual tests or who they "think" will win. this has nothing to do with the battles in the beyblade anime.
when the period of voting time is over, i will decide on the winner then move on to another group of beyblades...
[ i just posted this before i saw that another comment was posted.] <-- that was an edit i just did
(Jun. 13, 2011 11:53 PM)frost Wrote: [ -> ]it has now occured to me that i may be partially stupid! just kidding, well maybe . alright um, i think there might be alot of things wrong with this thread
actually read my comment above, it may have a use, competitive theory analysis, you may want to rethink the title and OP, as it may be useful for other members
Edit: ill rate the thread if you rethink the contents
... Don't we have a parts testing thread?
(Jun. 13, 2011 11:59 PM)Hero Wrote: [ -> ]... Don't we have a parts testing thread?
this isn't parts testing its theoretical battles, i think competitive theory battles tho, as theory needs to be used competitively to the use of your mode, angle, shot, variants, and even counters.
so its like strategy
But basically we mention some combos and then we vote on which is better, he eventually tests it out to see which is better. Isn't it just the same thing?
(Jun. 14, 2011 12:06 AM)Hero Wrote: [ -> ]But basically we mention a combo and the we vote on which is better, he eventually tests it out to see which is better. Isn't it just the same thing?
thats what he made the thread for... but i believe if it stays this state it will be closed...
but if it was competitive theory, as that has uses, and is used when you have beys like MF Meteo L Drago CH120 XF, MF-L(H) Hell Kerbecs BD145 CS etc, when a bey has modes and different launch styles can change results dramatically.
if the thread is not edited, and closed, i may make a thread around competitive theory, as it is quite useful, and a few beys today are based around it...
Edit: what title name change... uh oh, this might end...
oh no youve got it all wrong. after people vote [which can be determined by testing the beyblades if wanted] i will count up the votes and see which one everybody or just a general idea of everybody thinks would win. i dont really test them, i just add up the votes per bey and then choose another topic [ or pick a topic that people have voted on]. and thats basically it. [ when i have tested it, earth virgo won when it was me versus my brother. after that i went along and customized him which is a habit of mine. as of now i have 9 customized beyblades. but this couldve been different in other cases.] i hope this clarify's things. wow i just realized i was using a larger vocabulary than what i usually use
tssk! well im really confused. can you send me a private message of what definitly needs to be changed so im not shut down like most companies. by the way youve been alot of help so far Callum.