World Beyblade Organization by Fighting Spirits Inc.

Is CH120 any good for destabilizing?

Considering destabilizers go under other beys, no.

Is there any difference between the Gasher clear wheel and Cancer clear wheel for destabilizing?

No, Gasher is just a the Hasbro name change for Cancer. To protect the Children's innocence I suppose. Gasher is actually heavier then cancer am I right?

(Feb. 14, 2011  3:30 AM)CyberDranzer Wrote: [ -> ]Is CH120 any good for destabilizing?

It would only be useful if your opponent is 230 based , you may think , there is 145 for that , but CH120 can add bit of weight & may be better

Don't think me wrong but I think An hasbro dark +gasher/cancer would be good for destablising in 105/ch120 height as the clear wheel completely stays in top of the metal wheel so could anyone test this.

I don't think so. I highly doubt dark has any proper destabiliser ability.

nor do i, dark is just.....horrible

Nope,
Not like that,
Hasbro Dark completely exposes the clear wheel so gasher has full adavntage to destablize the other bey

(Feb. 14, 2011  1:17 PM)Aquila112 Wrote: [ -> ]Don't think me wrong but I think An hasbro dark +gasher/cancer would be good for destablising in 105/ch120 height as the clear wheel completely stays in top of the metal wheel so could anyone test this.

This is not that useful as dark has very less stamina & destabilizers already are low stamina beys my finding for destabilizers are , Flame Bull 100 WB good , Burn Bull 100 WB decent & when i use sf the results are horrible , dark does not have any attacking ability , a destabilizer needs a ,mixture of speed & power to do it's job & ch120 based destabilizers will only work against 230 based beys otherwise according to my finds ch120 is useless , if i am wrong do correct me as i am open to increasing my bey knowledge

(Feb. 14, 2011  1:51 PM)NitroNeo Wrote: [ -> ]This is not that useful as dark has very less stamina & destabilizers already are low stamina beys my finding for destabilizers are , Flame Bull 100 WB good , Burn Bull 100 WB decent & when i use sf the results are horrible , dark does not have any attacking ability , a destabilizer needs a ,mixture of speed & power to do it's job & ch120 based destabilizers will only work against 230 based beys otherwise according to my finds ch120 is useless , if i am wrong do correct me as i am open to increasing my bey knowledge

I agree with you,
But have you ever noticed how low Hasbro dark is set when compared to flame
This gives it an advantage of being on an higher track and completely exposing the clear wheel.
Dark(hasbro) Bull(hasbro) 105/ch120 wb is a really great combo in my opinion Could you please do some tests.

That isn't the only factor. Flame wins completly because of the shape of the wheel. You can test if you want but i'm not going to.

hey i think you should test poison as a destablizer i used it with 100 and it was good

(Feb. 14, 2011  6:10 PM)Kid Sniper Wrote: [ -> ]hey i think you should test poison as a destablizer i used it with 100 and it was good

Against?

Rock also completely exposes the clear wheel. Does that make it a great destabilizer? No. Most good destabilizers have one thing in common: A decent slope on either the metal wheel and/or clear wheel. In the case of MF L Drago 100/90WF/JB there is no clear wheel, it's the slopes of the metal wheel that destabilizes. I'm not saying that clear wheels aren't important in destabilizing, I'm saying that they don't do all the destabilizing by themselves. So exposing them more without a complimenting metal wheel will result in FAILURE.

(Feb. 14, 2011  6:10 PM)Kid Sniper Wrote: [ -> ]hey i think you should test poison as a destablizer i used it with 100 and it was good

Poison is just as bad as dark.

Could Aquario be used in a Ray-Based destabalizer?

Not sure. No one's tried it yet I don't think. Also Flame and Burn are much better than Ray for destabilisers.

I've been fooling around with my beys and I've found out my Meteo (rush red) is a better destabiliser (w/ 90 WF) than attacker (w/ 85 RF) the combo I used is Meteo L Drago II (rush) 90 WF it did well against my libra (bb-96)

Also not done anything with this bey yet but I think MF/MF-H Screw Giraffe/Unicorno/Gill 90/85 WF/WB would do pretty well

(Mar. 02, 2011  2:05 AM)Callum6939 Wrote: [ -> ]I've been fooling around with my beys and I've found out my Meteo (rush red) is a better destabiliser (w/ 90 WF) than attacker (w/ 85 RF) the combo I used is Meteo L Drago II (rush) 90 WF it did well against my libra (bb-96)

Also not done anything with this bey yet but I think MF/MF-H Screw Giraffe/Unicorno/Gill 90/85 WF/WB would do pretty well

Would you mind posting tests instead of spurting out combos? If you battled an uncustomized Libra, that's not showing good results, seeing as it's not a top-tier stamina combo.

(Mar. 02, 2011  3:47 AM)xXKaiouyaXx Wrote: [ -> ]

(Mar. 02, 2011  2:05 AM)Callum6939 Wrote: [ -> ]I've been fooling around with my beys and I've found out my Meteo (rush red) is a better destabiliser (w/ 90 WF) than attacker (w/ 85 RF) the combo I used is Meteo L Drago II (rush) 90 WF it did well against my libra (bb-96)

Also not done anything with this bey yet but I think MF/MF-H Screw Giraffe/Unicorno/Gill 90/85 WF/WB would do pretty well

Would you mind posting tests instead of spurting out combos? If you battled an uncustomized Libra, that's not showing good results, seeing as it's not a top-tier stamina combo.

sorry it also wasnt an uncustomized libra it was MF-H Libra 100 CS a low defence combo as, as i do not own a GB145 and 230 yet, but will do as soon as im done studying lol

Thanks for testing.

How about destabilising attackers, like Flame/Burn/Killer/Bakushin Bull/Capricorne/Aquario/Gasher (Hasbro) 100F/WF? They're nearly game-breaking. My Flame Bull 100F can beat a lot of other beys, and it's like a cross between a destabilising attacker and destabiliser.

It's not really cause F is still a bottom which has use in destabilisers and anyway destabiliser by definition are kind of attackers. If you've got an attack stadium then could you do some testing.

(Mar. 02, 2011  11:42 PM)Ultrablader Wrote: [ -> ]It's not really cause F is still a bottom which has use in destabilisers and anyway destabiliser by definition are kind of attackers. If you've got an attack stadium then could you do some testing.

I have F and an attack stadium. What would you like to see it against?