(Aug. 08, 2015  11:55 PM)Taiwo Seigi Wrote: Has anyone tested the current MFB top-tier list in the Burst Standard Type Stadium yet? I wanted to know if results were similar or nearly identical so we can try to legalize it for MFB play. With Attack Types being so expensive and rare, it would be great for bladers with not much money that still want to play and have tournaments in their area.

(Aug. 14, 2015  10:42 PM)LMAO Wrote: However, it's a scary step to take though. Since there can be differences. I think you should do tests against Defense since Defense types will dominate a lot more since the Tornado ridge is a little bigger it may give Defense types a little more of an advantage.

(Aug. 14, 2015  10:42 PM)LMAO Wrote: EDIT: I wanted to bring up another point, with Bursts the Beyblades are quite small and so are the grips, so the space provided to launch into is pretty even for both bladers, however when using Standard or Limited customs, it'll be a little harder to launch into the stadium since the Beyblades themselves are quite big and the grips with all the different types of accessories takes up quite a bit of space. Launching into the stadium may be a problem since you have a very limited launch angle.

(Aug. 15, 2015  1:53 AM)Bey Brad Wrote: To be fair though, we were always misusing BB-10 by not using the barriers in the first place. (Something to keep in mind with all this talk of busted BeyLaunchers, too ...)

(Aug. 15, 2015  1:49 AM)Kei Wrote: Definitely worth considering! Thanks for taking the time to do tests, Mitsu. Personally, I'd like to see some BD145RDF and BD145RSF testing, as those two combinations are relatively common in Standard Format and when combined with a Synchrom are incredibly heavy; I wonder how they would interact with the exits/barriers on the Burst BeyStadium Standard Type. Would they be harder to KO than they already are?

(Aug. 15, 2015  2:03 AM)Mitsu Wrote: Is there anything in specific you'd like me to test against BD145RDF/RSF?

Personally, I don't feel as they'd be any harder to KO even with the different dimensions, nor would repelling back from the barrier walls actually work if KO'ed as it only seems to with lighter Beyblades from what I've seen so far.

(Aug. 15, 2015  11:24 PM)juncction Wrote: 3) The rebound, from the exit holes will negatively impact attack types and randomly reduce their efficiency. Attack types are already pretty risky to use, but there have been times where the rebound on the Zero-G stadium has denied me a KO by the pocket reflecting the exiting bey back into the stadium. As someone who uses attack types frequently I feel like the Burst Standard stadium's additional walls add another layer of randomness that cannot be accounted for. This random factor only hurts attack types. If a stamina or defense type were to be knocked into the penalty pocket and then rebound back into the stadium, it will probably still have enough spin to win.... but if an attack type were to recoil into the penalty pocket and rebound back in it will lose a ton of spin and have no chance of winning.

(Aug. 15, 2015  2:11 AM)Kei Wrote: I'd test various Attack combos against it. Whatever you think is best. Thanks!

Wombat Wrote:Did the taller customs (F230GCF) seem to hit the wall above the B-Pits/exits and bounce back in when shorter customs would have been KOed?

Wombat Wrote:This doesn't have to do with the stadium comparisons but still caught my eye: if the logic for RF-based Defense holds true, that the Beyblade's momentum will cancel out its proximity to the edge of the Stadium when taking hits, why did the F230GCF combos lose more often than the stationary Stamina combos? I get that GCF has worse recoil control than RF but surely it should be able to stop the Attack type's momentum with a head on collision (especially in Genbull Genbull's case, what with the 20g or so weight advantage and decent Smash on the bottom Wheel)?

(Aug. 15, 2015  11:24 PM)juncction Wrote: In my opinion,


I think the Burst Standard Stadium has a few shortcomings that can make it drastically different from the Attack Type Stadium (most of which are already listed). And because of the differences, it shouldn't be used as an official tournament stadium beyond burst.


1) The cover that's on the Burst Standard Type limits the launching room. People put all kinds of attachments on their launchers, and that reduces the space even further. Unless there can be some type of standardization on what is allowed on launchers (imo you shouldn't be allowed to put anything on them other than your launcher), then there will be space constraints that aren't present in the Attack Type Stadium which limit the variety of launch and type of launch.

2) The height of the cover on the Burst Standard Type increases the height of which Beyblades are launched from. Which can result in either bouncing or collisions mid air (especially for MFB's extremely heavy synchromes). The lack of the cover in the Attack Type stadium allows you to launch much lower to the floor which again gives you more options.

3) The rebound, from the exit holes will negatively impact attack types and randomly reduce their efficiency. Attack types are already pretty risky to use, but there have been times where the rebound on the Zero-G stadium has denied me a KO by the pocket reflecting the exiting bey back into the stadium. As someone who uses attack types frequently I feel like the Burst Standard stadium's additional walls add another layer of randomness that cannot be accounted for. This random factor only hurts attack types. If a stamina or defense type were to be knocked into the penalty pocket and then rebound back into the stadium, it will probably still have enough spin to win.... but if an attack type were to recoil into the penalty pocket and rebound back in it will lose a ton of spin and have no chance of winning.