![]() |
CF Vs. GCF (Zero-G Sway Attack) - Printable Version +- World Beyblade Organization (https://worldbeyblade.org) +-- Forum: Beyblade Discussion (https://worldbeyblade.org/Forum-Beyblade-Discussion) +--- Forum: Beyblade Customizations (https://worldbeyblade.org/Forum-Beyblade-Customizations) +---- Forum: Zero-G/Shogun Steel Customizations (https://worldbeyblade.org/Forum-Zero-G-Shogun-Steel-Customizations) +---- Thread: CF Vs. GCF (Zero-G Sway Attack) (/Thread-CF-Vs-GCF-Zero-G-Sway-Attack) |
CF Vs. GCF (Zero-G Sway Attack) - UltimateFantasy - Oct. 25, 2012 I have been wanting to do this for a while, although I haven't had the time. So... Here it is... I wanted to compare GCF to CF in terms of Sway Attack in the Zero G Attack Stadium. The Diablo Kerbecs E230CF combo originally tested by *Ginga* was PERFECT for this situation and I wanted to see how it would change if I used GCF, so here it is: Zero-G Attack Type Stadium Takara Tomy Beylauncher 3-Segment Launcher Grip Takara Tomy Grip Rubber Takara Tomy Angle Compass Beylauncher Suspension Revizer Saramanda ALWAYS launched first. Diablo Kerbecs E230 (Normal Mode) GCF Vs. MSF Revizer Saramanda 160 SB Note: Self KO's NOT redone. Diablo: 1 Win (SKO) Revizer: 19 Wins (17 OS, 2 KO) Diablo Win Rate: 5% Spoiler (Click to View) Diablo Kerbecs E230 (Boost Mode) GCF Vs. MSF Revizer Saramanda 160 SB Note: Self KO's NOT redone. Diablo: 0 Wins Revizer: 20 Wins (16 OS, 4 Self KO) Diablo Win Rate: 0% Spoiler (Click to View) Diablo Kerbecs E230 (Normal Mode) CF Vs. MSF Revizer Saramanda 160 SB Note: Self KO's NOT redone. Diablo: 1 Wins (1 OS) Revizer: 19 Wins (19 OS) Diablo Win Rate: 5% Spoiler (Click to View) Diablo Kerbecs E230 (Boost Mode) CF Vs. MSF Revizer Saramanda 160 SB Note: Self KO's NOT redone. Diablo: 2 Wins (1 SKO, 1 Combination of SKO and KO) Revizer: 18 Wins (16 OS, 2 Self KO) Diablo Win Rate: 10% Spoiler (Click to View) Overall, CF is better than GCF in this combo. I also need to try a different combo to compare GCF to CF as well as other's testing. I found out the defense types I use are WAY to powerful to try and test how good my attack types are (which is good for tournaments). I will hopefully do more testing on this with different combos and hope to see other's testing for this. RE: CF Vs. GCF (Zero-G Sway Attack) - *Ginga* - Oct. 26, 2012 I will do comparative results over the weekend with CF. RE: CF Vs. GCF (Zero-G Sway Attack) - XtremeBlader132 - Oct. 26, 2012 can you try something heavier than diablo? its kinda to light when compared with most synchrome beys RE: CF Vs. GCF (Zero-G Sway Attack) - UltimateFantasy - Oct. 26, 2012 I can do Phoenic Ifraid or Ifraid Phoenic. I only have the first five chrome wheels released. (Oct. 26, 2012 12:24 AM)*Ginga* Wrote: I will do comparative results over the weekend with CF. Thanks, I will appreciate it. ![]() RE: CF Vs. GCF (Zero-G Sway Attack) - KainHighwind - Oct. 26, 2012 Since you have Gryph and Phoenic, would you mind doing Gryph Phoenic E230(normal) as your synchrom for these tests. I have been wanting to see how that performs in a Zero G stadium. RE: CF Vs. GCF (Zero-G Sway Attack) - UltimateFantasy - Oct. 27, 2012 (Oct. 26, 2012 2:32 PM)Kain_Highwind Wrote: Since you have Gryph and Phoenic, would you mind doing Gryph Phoenic E230(normal) as your synchrom for these tests. I have been wanting to see how that performs in a Zero G stadium. I said the first five chrome wheels meaning Ifraid, Saramanda, Phoenic, Orojya, and Revizer. I don't have Gryph yet, but I can do Ifraid Phoenic/Phoenic Ifraid. RE: CF Vs. GCF (Zero-G Sway Attack) - KainHighwind - Oct. 28, 2012 (Oct. 26, 2012 12:53 AM)UltimateFantasy Wrote: I can do Phoenic Ifraid or Ifraid Gryph. I only have the first five chrome wheels released. You said right here that you can do Ifraid Gryph. So that led me to believe you had Gryph. RE: CF Vs. GCF (Zero-G Sway Attack) - UltimateFantasy - Oct. 28, 2012 Sorry about that. I meant to say Ifraid Phoenic. Sadly, I don't have Gryph. My mistake... RE: CF Vs. GCF (Zero-G Sway Attack) - ShinobuXD - Apr. 06, 2013 Time to revive this thread with some comparisons. The combos used were my benchmark defender- MF-H Diablo Kerbecs TH170 WB, and an attacker, MSF-L Goreim Wyvang SA165(Zero-G Attack Mode)CF/GCF/GF. I think the thread needs to be updated with GF in the title. GCF Attacker vs WB Defender GCF:8 Wins(5 0GKO, 3 KO) WB:12 Wins(7 0GKO, 4 OS, 1 KO) 1 Tie GCF Win Rate: 40% CF Attacker vs WB Defender CF:9 Wins(4 0GKO), 4 OS, 1 KO) WB:11 Wins(6 OS, 3 0GKO, 2 KO) CF Win Rate: 45% GF Attacker vs WB Defender GF: 11 Wins(9 0GKO, 1 KO, 1 OS) WB: 9 Wins(4 0GKO, 4 OS, 1 KO) GF Win Rate: 55% So, if my tests are correct(we need more tests though!)GF is best. Unfortunately, it is also the hardest to use. With GF, you need a really skilled launch, otherwise you'll Self KO. I actually had to restart halfway through, because I was Self KOing almost every time. CF makes up for its lack of sway with survival. If you want a decent amount of survival and sway,(not a bad idea with unswayable synchroms that have terrible stamina around!) I would probably suggest something like Genbull Genbull SA165 CF, but I can't say for sure as I don't own two Genbulls. GCF did the worst, but I think it is the most consistent. If you want consistency, I'd go for GCF. So, overall, IMO, I think each has their place, but we do of course need more tests to say this for sure. RE: CF Vs. GCF (Zero-G Sway Attack) - ryugavskyoya1 - Apr. 30, 2013 Bahamdia Ifraid E230CF vs Revizer Revizer E230RS Bahamdia Ifraid E230GCF vs Revizer Revizer E1230RS |