+- World Beyblade Organization by Fighting Spirits Inc. (https://worldbeyblade.org)
+-- Forum: Other (https://worldbeyblade.org/Forum-Other)
+--- Forum: Closed Threads (https://worldbeyblade.org/Forum-Closed-Threads)
+--- Thread: Northern California Section (/Thread-Northern-California-Section)
Pages:
1
2
Northern California Section - Hyuuga Neji - Jul. 06, 2009
Looking at the map, I can see quite a few fellow bladers around Sacramento and elsewhere in the valley (unforunately, none near me =/)
Let's all get together as a community... and for the largest state in the nation, you'd think we would have much more bladers.
Current Members List:
Hyuuga Neji
PinoBoyTroy
austusc2
matt2796
RE: Northern California Section - PinoBoyTroy - Jul. 26, 2009
I live near sacramento
RE: Northern California Section - Hyuuga Neji - Jul. 26, 2009
Awesome... Where exactly? Roseville? Rocklin?
RE: Northern California Section - PinoBoyTroy - Jul. 30, 2009
Benicia, but my parents could drive me to the location of the event.
RE: Northern California Section - Hyuuga Neji - Jul. 30, 2009
To be honest, we'll need a lot more members before we can have any sort of event. (And that's cool, I don't live TOO far away in Fremont...)
RE: Northern California Section - austusc2 - Aug. 01, 2009
I dont live to far away from sacramento...
RE: Northern California Section - Havok - Aug. 01, 2009
Sorry to burst your Cali bubble but it is in fact not the largest state, that would be alazka, followed by the great state of TEXAS oh yeah!
RE: Northern California Section - AnnieDuck - Aug. 01, 2009
(Aug. 01, 2009 12:39 AM)Havok Wrote: Sorry to burst your Cali bubble but it is in fact not the largest state, that would be alazka, followed by the great state of TEXAS oh yeah!
pretty sure they were going by population
RE: Northern California Section - PinoBoyTroy - Aug. 01, 2009
I can bring a few people. How many do we need
RE: Northern California Section - Bey Brad - Aug. 01, 2009
Minimum of 8.
RE: Northern California Section - austusc2 - Aug. 01, 2009
I would go!!!
well i would go if its a universal rule tournament and not a standard rule tourny... I dont have any mfb's yet...
RE: Northern California Section - austusc2 - Aug. 01, 2009
if we do have a tourny or a meet can we make it like not to far from fresno???
RE: Northern California Section - matt2796 - Aug. 01, 2009
i am in fresno XD
RE: Northern California Section - Hyuuga Neji - Aug. 01, 2009
(Aug. 01, 2009 1:05 AM)AnnieDuck Wrote: pretty sure they were going by population
This.
Anyways, if we have any tourneys, we can always have seperate tourneys for Plastics, HMS, and MFB.
RE: Northern California Section - PinoBoyTroy - Aug. 02, 2009
We should have it in Sacramento
RE: Northern California Section - austusc2 - Aug. 02, 2009
nah sacremento is a lil to far how about in fresno
RE: Northern California Section - austusc2 - Aug. 02, 2009
oh and neji about your suggestion about having seperate tournys for different beyblades i disagree... we wont have enough people for that... we should have an open format all types of legal beys in 1 tourny
RE: Northern California Section - Hyuuga Neji - Aug. 02, 2009
Well, why not? I mean, I have plastics and HMS at the moment, so I could participate in both.
RE: Northern California Section - Cailany - Aug. 02, 2009
If you want a better list of who can go.
Pick a exact location. I probably could, depending where and what format is being used.
RE: Northern California Section - Havok - Aug. 02, 2009
(Aug. 01, 2009 1:05 AM)AnnieDuck Wrote: pretty sure they were going by population
then wouldnt you say largest population, when using largest its commonly used for size not quantity
RE: Northern California Section - Hyuuga Neji - Aug. 02, 2009
(Aug. 02, 2009 8:28 PM)Havok Wrote: then wouldnt you say largest population, when using largest its commonly used for size not quantity
does it even matter...
RE: Northern California Section - Bey Brad - Aug. 02, 2009
(Aug. 02, 2009 7:02 PM)Hyuuga Neji Wrote: Well, why not? I mean, I have plastics and HMS at the moment, so I could participate in both.
Because it's dividing your participants. Instead of having one tournament with sixteen people, you might end up having two tournaments with eight people. Furthermore, I'm not sure if I would approve two tournaments in the same day due to BP inflation.
(Aug. 02, 2009 8:28 PM)Havok Wrote: then wouldnt you say largest population, when using largest its commonly used for size not quantity
Nobody cares.
RE: Northern California Section - austusc2 - Aug. 02, 2009
ty beybrad I was getting tired of them talking about who is bigger and what not on a thread thats supposed to be getting people together for a tournament lol...
RE: Northern California Section - Hyuuga Neji - Aug. 03, 2009
(Aug. 02, 2009 9:43 PM)Bey Brad Wrote: Because it's dividing your participants. Instead of having one tournament with sixteen people, you might end up having two tournaments with eight people. Furthermore, I'm not sure if I would approve two tournaments in the same day due to BP inflation.
Ah. I see...
RE: Northern California Section - PinoBoyTroy - Aug. 03, 2009
ummm fresno's pushing it.