+- World Beyblade Organization by Fighting Spirits Inc. (https://worldbeyblade.org)
+-- Forum: Other (https://worldbeyblade.org/Forum-Other)
+--- Forum: Closed Threads (https://worldbeyblade.org/Forum-Closed-Threads)
+--- Thread: Zero-G parts testing discussion (/Thread-Zero-G-parts-testing-discussion)
Zero-G parts testing discussion - Brood - Mar. 23, 2012
Well Zero-g is almost here and what we're gonna have to do?Tests.ALOT of them.though,I dont think its convinent for the players and for the results if we dont do an organized way.
Can we discuss whose gonna test what part?This way, people can tests parts distinctly and reduce the amount of work.Also, concentrating on few parts may lead to more accurate results.However the Zero-G stadium is not confirmed as a competetive stadium to play in yet and there will probably be a few that owns Zero-G stadium.
Each person will test about 5-10 parts including both tracks and bottoms with top tier metal wheels.There will be a thread where you post the results and inform what type it is and how it acted.
Part list:
The one with the star is already taken.
We probably dont need to test all of them (especially the tracks) so try grabbing parts you think it will be valid.
Tracks:
85
90
100
105 W105 LW105 DF105
CH120
125 D125 T125
130 WA130 S130
135
145 DF145 WD145 C145 H145 ED145 M145 GB145 SW145 R145 AD145 BD145 UW145
TH170
230
Bottom:
F SF HF FS WF RF HF/S Q R2F LF RSF XF LRF MF RDF
S BS ES MS CS RS DS EDS SWD
D B WB SD WD JB MB PD EWD W2D RB
F:D F:S D:D B:D X:F
Lets start by discussing if this thread is worth existing.
RE: Zero-G parts testing discussion - Byerg - Mar. 23, 2012
There is no reason to have one thread for testing of all the new parts..I'd suggest we have separate threads for each part as we always have.
Also, we already test everything in an organized way..the way you're describing it sounds more unorganized than what we do now.
RE: Zero-G parts testing discussion - Brood - Mar. 23, 2012
Why not make each thread for parts with similarities (like D SD WD PD)if were making numerous threads?
RE: Zero-G parts testing discussion - Janstarblast - Mar. 23, 2012
Its not that, we actually already have different threads for those, so there's seemingly no point in changing the system now... And no, even though the name may lead you to believe that D, SD, WD and PD are similar, in reality, they differ quite a lot.
Its a nice idea though, to have a thread for a certain group of parts, but I don't think changing the age-old tradition of having separate threads for separate parts would be wise.
The thread might get a bit confusing and crowded, and our previous policy of having an individual discussion for individual parts is always better, IMO. Moreover, this time we have an even more complicated matter of Synchrom to handle, and having one thread for it all is quite........meh.
Moreover, you seem to be giving away sets of parts to a certain individual who agrees to test them.
For example, I choose 85 and LRF. Does this mean that only I can do these tests?
No, that is certainly not the system we follow. We want tests from each and every member who is capable of doing so, as results differ from member-to-member, owing to launch power, condition of the tip, etc.
So, that ain't a good idea.
There are many more points that may go against the idea of this thread, but these are the main ones.
It should also be noted that my opinion simply won't matter.
RE: Zero-G parts testing discussion - Hazel - Mar. 23, 2012
Things not out yet, thread not needed.