Artie Wrote:holy carp, david archuletta posts on BW!?!

G Wrote:I'm used to seeing a digital camera for these kind of shots, but this works too lol

Composer of Requiems Wrote:Personally, I think it really depends. There's a lot of advantages of actual film, but DSLRs are much more convenient, and don't have the added cost of film. It's easier to take multiple shots, to change the output without opening it up and loading a different type of film, and so on; the only major drawback that I can think of is in the sensitivity of the plate and the limits of the image resolution.

Bey Brad Wrote:okay just because i installed an image resizer on the board does not mean you shouldn't resize your images

AnnieDuck Wrote:

Composer of Requiems Wrote:Personally, I think it really depends. There's a lot of advantages of actual film, but DSLRs are much more convenient, and don't have the added cost of film. It's easier to take multiple shots, to change the output without opening it up and loading a different type of film, and so on; the only major drawback that I can think of is in the sensitivity of the plate and the limits of the image resolution.

In terms of picking up detail in light and shadow, film is better. There's a quality to it that's impossible to replicate with digital.

*art photographer's daughter lol*

Spinster Wrote:When there's a smaller set number of shots you can get on a camera at one time, you pick 'em a lot more carefully. Back in my photography days, I used rolls of film that could only take 15 pictures, so that I knew I had to make every one count.