World Beyblade Organization by Fighting Spirits Inc.
C145 as Attack Track..... - Printable Version

+- World Beyblade Organization by Fighting Spirits Inc. (https://worldbeyblade.org)
+-- Forum: Other (https://worldbeyblade.org/Forum-Other)
+--- Forum: Closed Threads (https://worldbeyblade.org/Forum-Closed-Threads)
+--- Thread: C145 as Attack Track..... (/Thread-C145-as-Attack-Track)

C145 as Attack Track..... - DragoEmperor98 - Mar. 14, 2011

I have been testing C145 lately and it makes an amazing track....
ex. Pegasis C145RF is amazing......
Could the WBo help and do some tests....

RE: C145 as Attack Track..... - Vongola-Hibari - Mar. 14, 2011

I can do some testing, just name what stadium you want it to be tested in.

RE: C145 as Attack Track..... - ThePokeBlader - Mar. 14, 2011

(Mar. 14, 2011  6:57 PM)Vongola-Hibari Wrote: I can do some testing, just name what stadium you want it to be tested in.

I Would Reccomend The TT Attack Staduim

RE: C145 as Attack Track..... - DragoEmperor98 - Mar. 14, 2011

Yup!
TT Attack Stadium Smile
Thanx Grin

RE: C145 as Attack Track..... - Poseidon - Mar. 14, 2011

just saying in theory this won't work. The wings are free spinning and because of that it used defensively. They don't deal damage and recoils is minimal.Furthermore the wings don't go far enough to deal damage. Ultimately H145 would be better

RE: C145 as Attack Track..... - Dan - Mar. 14, 2011

This will do horribly against other attack beys, LTS/DC's because C145 scrapes so much.

RE: C145 as Attack Track..... - Azlanslayer - Mar. 14, 2011

I think because of 145's height, Pegasis was able to make decent results. C145 though, could make its stamina a lil better because of its Claws. I will do some testing. Just don't hope for good results Smile

RE: C145 as Attack Track..... - Dan - Mar. 14, 2011

I am assuming the OP means more than just Pegasis. (Lightning, Gravity, Vulcan etc.)

RE: C145 as Attack Track..... - Daegor42 - Mar. 14, 2011

(May. 23, 2010  12:19 AM)♥ Wrote: It is simply not good enough to write out your customisation, and declare “it is good”, or even worse, ask if it is good - there shouldn’t really be any threads asking whether a customisation is good if you do not have access to the parts. To rectify this, we should make a few things clear:
  • Explain the concept : we need to know what it is you are trying to achieve, how, in what conditions, etc. This is already in the Information Box in the Customisation Forum, so we're not sure why people aren't sticking to this!
  • Please post some test results if you think your customisation has potential. Do not just say “it beats everything!”