World Beyblade Organization by Fighting Spirits Inc.
Which is better, "Halo: Reach" or "Call of Duty: Black Ops"? - Printable Version

+- World Beyblade Organization by Fighting Spirits Inc. (https://worldbeyblade.org)
+-- Forum: Off-Topic Forums (https://worldbeyblade.org/Forum-Off-Topic-Forums)
+--- Forum: Video Games (https://worldbeyblade.org/Forum-Video-Games)
+--- Thread: Which is better, "Halo: Reach" or "Call of Duty: Black Ops"? (/Thread-Which-is-better-Halo-Reach-or-Call-of-Duty-Black-Ops)

Pages: 1 2 3 4


Which is better, "Halo: Reach" or "Call of Duty: Black Ops"? - Chinmoku - Dec. 21, 2010

Which is better, "Halo: Reach" or "Call of Duty: Black Ops?" If you have an argument, post it here. For example, "Call of Duty: Black Ops" is cross-console, while "Halo: Reach" is exclusively for Xbox 360. However, "Call of Duty: Black Ops" has a lot of blood and cursing, while "Halo: Reach" has less blood and almost no swearing. "Halo: Reach" has a "forge" mode so you can make your own multiplayer maps and share them and play on them with friends. "Call of Duty: Black Ops" does not have this feature. Also, "Halo: Reach" has countless multiplayer game types and even more sub-types. So, which is better? Post your arguments and facts about each game in this thread, please.


RE: Which is better, "Halo: Reach" or "Call of Duty: Black Ops"? - ƛnubis - Dec. 22, 2010

i like reach better cause forge is plain amazing


RE: Which is better, "Halo: Reach" or "Call of Duty: Black Ops"? - Chinmoku - Dec. 22, 2010

Personally, I prefer "Halo: Reach" because of forge and the outstanding multiplayer in general. Even the co-op is amazing.


RE: Which is better, "Halo: Reach" or "Call of Duty: Black Ops"? - Thresher - Dec. 22, 2010

I prefer Reach, but this is like comparing apples to carrots.


RE: Which is better, "Halo: Reach" or "Call of Duty: Black Ops"? - eclipse162 - Dec. 22, 2010

Reach is better. You have futuristic weapons and vehicles, while Black Ops has modern day weapons.


RE: Which is better, "Halo: Reach" or "Call of Duty: Black Ops"? - Amaterasu - Dec. 22, 2010

both equal: black ops has zombies while reach has firefight


RE: Which is better, "Halo: Reach" or "Call of Duty: Black Ops"? - To - Dec. 22, 2010

(Dec. 22, 2010  2:51 PM)Thresher Wrote: I prefer Reach, but this is like comparing apples to carrots.

No it's not. They're both FPS games, and slight differences in presentation or gameplay doesn't allow comparisons to just not exist. People will compare Sonic Colors to Mario Galaxy even though both are dramatically different games within the platforming genre, and as an outisder to the FPS genre both CoD and Halo look very similar to me in their gameplay. One's a sci-fi shooter, and the other is a military shooter. Both with run and gun attitudes. This isn't Portal and Halo, the differences between the two don't seem exactly large.


RE: Which is better, "Halo: Reach" or "Call of Duty: Black Ops"? - Chinmoku - Dec. 22, 2010

(Dec. 22, 2010  5:18 PM)Ra Wrote: both equal: black ops has zombies while reach has firefight

Reach has both, actually Smile


RE: Which is better, "Halo: Reach" or "Call of Duty: Black Ops"? - Mfb Unboxer - Dec. 22, 2010

I like "Call Of Duty Black Ops" because of the Zombies and the story.


RE: Which is better, "Halo: Reach" or "Call of Duty: Black Ops"? - XBlader - Dec. 22, 2010

I like the story line form black ops and the customization feature on multiplayer, so black ops wins for this one. Although if you were comparing modern warfare to reach or halo 3, halo would win.


RE: Which is better, "Halo: Reach" or "Call of Duty: Black Ops"? - LIR - Dec. 22, 2010

I'd say black ops because it's really easy


RE: Which is better, "Halo: Reach" or "Call of Duty: Black Ops"? - Amaterasu - Dec. 22, 2010

Online mode try it. Zombies is easy if u have a good strategy. And I heard people say infection was easy and there's an invisisble elite somewhere!


RE: Which is better, "Halo: Reach" or "Call of Duty: Black Ops"? - Red Mockingbird - Dec. 22, 2010

Black ops was such a dissapointment for me. Graphics were terrible, but story line wasn't half bad.
Caught on that Mason's russian friend wasn't alive before half way lol.

But Reach had graphics, multiplayer, co-op, FORGE!! and overall it was just better.


RE: Which is better, "Halo: Reach" or "Call of Duty: Black Ops"? - morr - Dec. 22, 2010

reach


RE: Which is better, "Halo: Reach" or "Call of Duty: Black Ops"? - XBlader - Dec. 22, 2010

IMO, reach would be better and have more sales if it was available on consoles other than just the Xbox 360...


RE: Which is better, "Halo: Reach" or "Call of Duty: Black Ops"? - TITAN - Dec. 22, 2010

Black Ops FTW!!!


RE: Which is better, "Halo: Reach" or "Call of Duty: Black Ops"? - Afmkk99@aol.com - Dec. 23, 2010

HALOOO REEEAAACHHH ISSSS AAAWWWWEEEESSSOOOMMMMEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


RE: Which is better, "Halo: Reach" or "Call of Duty: Black Ops"? - Amaterasu - Dec. 23, 2010

(Dec. 22, 2010  11:41 PM)ZE12O Wrote: Black ops was such a dissapointment for me. Graphics were terrible, but story line wasn't half bad.
Caught on that Mason's russian friend wasn't alive before half way lol.

But Reach had graphics, multiplayer, co-op, FORGE!! and overall it was just better.
http://gamingbolt.com/halo-reach-versus-call-of-duty-black-ops-hd-screen-shot-comparison your post is very exaggerated


RE: Which is better, "Halo: Reach" or "Call of Duty: Black Ops"? - Annoying-Fork - Dec. 23, 2010

Halo Reach for me. Forge World and a much more flexible online experience which outweighs the other Halo online experiences.


RE: Which is better, "Halo: Reach" or "Call of Duty: Black Ops"? - ThePokeBlader - Dec. 23, 2010

pokemon XD
Lol halo reach


RE: Which is better, "Halo: Reach" or "Call of Duty: Black Ops"? - stormpegsus290 - Dec. 23, 2010

i say black ops love the multi player modes


RE: Which is better, "Halo: Reach" or "Call of Duty: Black Ops"? - Chinmoku - Dec. 23, 2010

(Dec. 22, 2010  11:37 PM)Ra Wrote: Online mode try it. Zombies is easy if u have a good strategy. And I heard people say infection was easy and there's an invisisble elite somewhere!

I actually know where the invisible elite is, and he has a datapad (he was probably going to school Smile ). If you can manage to kill him, you can grab the datapad and his weapons. If you have the right armor ability, you can turn invisible too! It's this kind of thing that makes Halo: Reach a great game.


RE: Which is better, "Halo: Reach" or "Call of Duty: Black Ops"? - Thresher - Dec. 23, 2010

(Dec. 22, 2010  5:58 PM)To Wrote:
(Dec. 22, 2010  2:51 PM)Thresher Wrote: I prefer Reach, but this is like comparing apples to carrots.

No it's not. They're both FPS games, and slight differences in presentation or gameplay doesn't allow comparisons to just not exist. People will compare Sonic Colors to Mario Galaxy even though both are dramatically different games within the platforming genre, and as an outisder to the FPS genre both CoD and Halo look very similar to me in their gameplay. One's a sci-fi shooter, and the other is a military shooter. Both with run and gun attitudes. This isn't Portal and Halo, the differences between the two don't seem exactly large.

The only things they have in common are the fact that they are both FPS games, they both have Team deathmatch and they both have CTF.


RE: Which is better, "Halo: Reach" or "Call of Duty: Black Ops"? - Brad(Buraddo) - Dec. 23, 2010

I think Halo Reach is way better, i have been a halo fan since it 1st came out Joyful_3


RE: Which is better, "Halo: Reach" or "Call of Duty: Black Ops"? - To - Dec. 24, 2010

(Dec. 23, 2010  8:11 AM)Thresher Wrote:
(Dec. 22, 2010  5:58 PM)To Wrote:
(Dec. 22, 2010  2:51 PM)Thresher Wrote: I prefer Reach, but this is like comparing apples to carrots.

No it's not. They're both FPS games, and slight differences in presentation or gameplay doesn't allow comparisons to just not exist. People will compare Sonic Colors to Mario Galaxy even though both are dramatically different games within the platforming genre, and as an outisder to the FPS genre both CoD and Halo look very similar to me in their gameplay. One's a sci-fi shooter, and the other is a military shooter. Both with run and gun attitudes. This isn't Portal and Halo, the differences between the two don't seem exactly large.

The only things they have in common are the fact that they are both FPS games, they both have Team deathmatch and they both have CTF.

It would be a lot easier if you list the differences, because as I mentioned, I'm an outsider, and outside of space marines vs. army soliders, I don't see a vast difference.