World Beyblade Organization by Fighting Spirits Inc.
WB as an Aggressive Bottom? - Printable Version

+- World Beyblade Organization by Fighting Spirits Inc. (https://worldbeyblade.org)
+-- Forum: Beyblade Discussion (https://worldbeyblade.org/Forum-Beyblade-Discussion)
+--- Forum: Beyblade Customizations (https://worldbeyblade.org/Forum-Beyblade-Customizations)
+---- Forum: Metal Fight Customizations (https://worldbeyblade.org/Forum-Metal-Fight-Customizations)
+---- Thread: WB as an Aggressive Bottom? (/Thread-WB-as-an-Aggressive-Bottom)

Pages: 1 2 3


WB as an Aggressive Bottom? - ハゼ - Dec. 12, 2010

I saw Diamonds thread, so I decided to ask a question. Sorry mods if this is out of place. I don't own a WB, but my friend corinzu does. When testing random combinations at my house, we discovered that Flame Pegasus 125WB was moving like an attack type. We used:
A Hasbro (hey, I'm working on getting a TT one) PTW stadium
Flame Pegasus 125WB launched at 100% power
and it moved like an attack type. During the week, I'll take a video, post it on YouTube, and provide the link. Unless anyone else tests it in the meantime.


RE: WB as an Aggressive Bottom? - lord Wolfblade - Dec. 12, 2010

no wb should not be used for attack (we have so many better options I.E rf and r2f) and this thread is going to be closed


RE: WB as an Aggressive Bottom? - Aquilaz112 - Dec. 12, 2010

wb is too slow to be an attack bottom
and in a PTW an attack type will never win
unless there is some luck
so some moderator could close the topic


RE: WB as an Aggressive Bottom? - ハゼ - Dec. 12, 2010

I wasn't saying it SHOULD be used, or anything like that, just saying that that result is the result I got from that combo. It could be faulty. It is loose, so who knows.
[sarcasm]And thank you for your confidence in my thread being closed.[/sarcasm]


RE: WB as an Aggressive Bottom? - Flames150 - Dec. 12, 2010

Well I think it kinda is... Like the way it said for WB "Launch it at 80%". Maybe if you launch it 100% it may go a little aggressive. Watch this video at the start: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXs_WQP5TRA


RE: WB as an Aggressive Bottom? - lord Wolfblade - Dec. 12, 2010

yes it moves around but not fast enough for attack


RE: WB as an Aggressive Bottom? - ハゼ - Dec. 12, 2010

Flames150, you are awesome. Launched at 100% speed, it moves aggressively, like an attack type. My point has been proven
(Dec. 12, 2010  6:02 PM)lord Wolfblade Wrote: yes it moves around but not fast enough for attack
I said to be used as an aggressive bottom, not as an Attack Type. It might be good for a Destabilizer.


RE: WB as an Aggressive Bottom? - lord Wolfblade - Dec. 12, 2010

edit: sf might still be better for a Destabilizer


RE: WB as an Aggressive Bottom? - ハゼ - Dec. 12, 2010

So what, you're admitting I was right? LOL, jk.
And I agree SF would be better, it's what I use for my Destabilizer, but it would work.


RE: WB as an Aggressive Bottom? - lord Wolfblade - Dec. 12, 2010

i never said it didnt move around i said it didnt move around very fast, dont take what i just said as being mean


RE: WB as an Aggressive Bottom? - ハゼ - Dec. 12, 2010

Sorry, didn't mean to cause offence. Just wanted to make a thread that finally had a point, lol.


RE: WB as an Aggressive Bottom? - Flames150 - Dec. 12, 2010

(Dec. 12, 2010  6:26 PM)lord Wolfblade Wrote: i never said it didnt move around i said it didnt move around very fast, dont take what i just said as being mean
Well actually it starts very fast then slows down in about 9 seconds. Remember launch it hard...


RE: WB as an Aggressive Bottom? - ハゼ - Dec. 12, 2010

(Dec. 12, 2010  6:31 PM)Flames150 Wrote:
(Dec. 12, 2010  6:26 PM)lord Wolfblade Wrote: i never said it didnt move around i said it didnt move around very fast, dont take what i just said as being mean
Well actually it starts very fast then slows down in about 9 seconds. Remember launch it hard...
Exactly what I wanted to say and couldn't.


RE: WB as an Aggressive Bottom? - Vamasco_ - Dec. 12, 2010

Wouldn´t JB be better ?
It as more stamina and it´s a very low bottom,I´m thinking destabilizer.
WB it´s a top tier defense bottom , used with rock and launched at 100% it may be a counter defenseve Beyblade.


RE: WB as an Aggressive Bottom? - Mc Frown - Dec. 12, 2010

On a sort of related point I think defense types with Attack Type Metal Wheels are a completely viable option.
Like MF-H Vulcan Bull GB145(WB/RSF [not sure which would be better])


RE: WB as an Aggressive Bottom? - Nojo294 - Dec. 12, 2010

(Dec. 12, 2010  7:53 PM)Mc Frown Wrote: On a sort of related point I think defense types with Attack Type Metal Wheels are a completely viable option.
Like MF-H Vulcan Bull GB145(WB/RSF [not sure which would be better])

Hmm... this becomes in itself a seperate category. I think RSF for more consistent agressive movement and WB for stamina.

EDIT: also, Vulcan was proved as a pretty decent defense wheel anyways...


RE: WB as an Aggressive Bottom? - Megablaster - Dec. 17, 2010

JB is too slow for attack, but JB does move like SF in my stadium, WB is also too slow for attack, but it moves like HF for 4 seconds then moves like B


RE: WB as an Aggressive Bottom? - Mc Frown - Dec. 17, 2010

wear it in more.


RE: WB as an Aggressive Bottom? - dman12 - Dec. 17, 2010

wb shouldnt be used as an attack bottom and also i can beat the mcfrown challenge <---off topic


RE: WB as an Aggressive Bottom? - AngelicSight - Dec. 17, 2010

No. just No.


RE: WB as an Aggressive Bottom? - Temporal - Dec. 17, 2010

WB has it's use, but it will never be top-tier. Though the KO's you do get (Rock!) are pretty. (Sent Dark BullGB145WB over a stadium wall! Standard stadium of course.)


RE: WB as an Aggressive Bottom? - Brooklyn-Z - Dec. 17, 2010

WB isnt top tier anymore?


RE: WB as an Aggressive Bottom? - Temporal - Dec. 17, 2010

As a defense tip, yes, as attack, no.


RE: WB as an Aggressive Bottom? - Brooklyn-Z - Dec. 17, 2010

ok,i was about to say its not top tier anymore? wtf O.o anyways WB does do kinda of good as an attack tip but not top tier


RE: WB as an Aggressive Bottom? - ハゼ - Dec. 17, 2010

Okay, people don't seem to understand what I'm saying. It could be used AGGRESSIVELY. Not the same thing as an attack bottom.