World Beyblade Organization by Fighting Spirits Inc.
Transformers: Dark of the Moon - Printable Version

+- World Beyblade Organization by Fighting Spirits Inc. (https://worldbeyblade.org)
+-- Forum: Off-Topic Forums (https://worldbeyblade.org/Forum-Off-Topic-Forums)
+--- Forum: Media (https://worldbeyblade.org/Forum-Media)
+--- Thread: Transformers: Dark of the Moon (/Thread-Transformers-Dark-of-the-Moon)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13


RE: Transformers: Dark of the Moon - Pony - Mar. 02, 2011

(Mar. 02, 2011  2:45 AM)Dude Wrote:
(Mar. 02, 2011  2:29 AM)Ray Joker Wrote: Apparently, he was the Prime before Optimus, and a big brother to him.

He supposedly went missing so they picked a new Prime, Optimus.

Damn, character developpment for Optimus Prime, the one character that we actually care about with this whole series?

This movie is one step in the right direction.

Just kill off Shia's character on-screen and everyone'll be happy.
You kill off Shia and the story will be sort of like decepticons tearing up Auto-bots. As much as I would like that to happen, it would ruin the whole movie.


RE: Transformers: Dark of the Moon - Dude - Mar. 02, 2011

(Mar. 02, 2011  3:04 AM)storm dranzer Wrote: You kill off Shia and the story will be sort of like decepticons tearing up Auto-bots. As much as I would like that to happen, it would ruin the whole movie.

No, I guarantee that the Transformer movies could do great without fleshy boring humans.

To back up my argument, I refer you to Beast Wars (Or Beasties, as it is sometimes called) which is extremely good and well written.


RE: Transformers: Dark of the Moon - Kai-V - Mar. 02, 2011

From my point of view, the movies are ruining the whole Transformers series, not the contrary ...


RE: Transformers: Dark of the Moon - Pony - Mar. 02, 2011

(Mar. 02, 2011  3:10 AM)Dude Wrote:
(Mar. 02, 2011  3:04 AM)storm dranzer Wrote: You kill off Shia and the story will be sort of like decepticons tearing up Auto-bots. As much as I would like that to happen, it would ruin the whole movie.

No, I guarantee that the Transformer movies could do great without fleshy boring humans.

To back up my argument, I refer you to Beast Wars (Or Beasties, as it is sometimes called) which is extremely good and well written.

Did you just insult yourself as well as every single other human in the world? Nice!
Kai-V, you are sort of right. The original Bumblebee was not a camero and they totally ruined him. Starscream has a darker voice than Megatron while in the original he had the voice of who he is. A coward.


RE: Transformers: Dark of the Moon - leonebest - Mar. 02, 2011

practilly everone has a crusk on megan fox,unless your gay.
lol i said megan ox instead of fox


RE: Transformers: Dark of the Moon - Ray Joker - Mar. 02, 2011

Beast Wars was purely awesome.

Besides, it's the humans fault that the Autobots get killed. In the ROTF Forest Scene, Optimus could've killed Megatron if it weren't for Sam.

Storm dranzer

I think Dude is trying to say that Transformers would be better without humans because Transformers are about giant robots, not about the humans.

Anyhow, I still like the movies. I'm just a kid, and so every Transformer movie I see, I will probably love. I know what the characters are about and what not, so I don't need to have any background story about them.

leone=best

Don't make untrue statements like that. This movie has no more Megan Fox, so there's really no point in talking about her.


RE: Transformers: Dark of the Moon - Pony - Mar. 02, 2011

(Mar. 02, 2011  3:39 AM)Ray Joker Wrote: Beast Wars was purely awesome.

Besides, it's the humans fault that the Autobots get killed. In the ROTF Forest Scene, Optimus could've killed Megatron if it weren't for Sam.

Storm dranzer

I think Dude is trying to say that Transformers would be better without humans because Transformers are about giant robots, not about the humans.

Anyhow, I still like the movies. I'm just a kid, and so every Transformer movie I see, I will probably love. I know what the characters are about and what not, so I don't need to have any background story about them.

leone=best

Don't make untrue statements like that. This movie has no more Megan Fox, so there's really no point in talking about her.

I guess. They made too much about the humans, so now they're stuck with it. How are they going to explain the character change though? That she got plastic surgery?
Sorry for double posting.
Shockwave is gonna be the villain for the last two then gets killed. I hope they show Cybertron. Oh, and another auto-bot is dead metal.


RE: Transformers: Dark of the Moon - JonnB - Mar. 04, 2011

(Mar. 02, 2011  3:42 AM)storm dranzer Wrote: How are they going to explain the character change though? That she got plastic surgery?

That's...ridiculous.

Sam leaves Mckayla (or vice versa) and Sam wants a relationship with someone who doesn't love the action or the big robots. Someone who loves him for who he is. He finds this is someone new Carly.

You really should read the whole thread before posting Uncertain


RE: Transformers: Dark of the Moon - To - Mar. 04, 2011

The new girl is supposed to play Carly. We don't really have confirmation on what happened to Mikaela, but rumor is that the movie will write off their relationship as Sam realizing Mikaela just liked the Alien Robot excitement part of their relationship...

Yeah, that's some Karate Kid bull right there.

(Mar. 02, 2011  3:10 AM)Kai-V Wrote: From my point of view, the movies are ruining the whole Transformers series, not the contrary ...

This is the same opinion of the die-hard Bakuten fans when they saw Metal Fusion.

It's a different universe, but unlike Beyblade, there are other ones running alongside it.


RE: Transformers: Dark of the Moon - JonnB - Mar. 04, 2011

(Mar. 04, 2011  3:37 AM)To Wrote: The new girl is supposed to play Carly. We don't really have confirmation on what happened to Mikaela, but rumor is that the movie will write off their relationship as Sam realizing Mikaela just liked the Alien Robot excitement part of their relationship...

Yeah, that's some Karate Kid bull right there.
Lol

Anyways I remember Shia LaBeouf explaining the transition in a interview during production. Not totally confirmed but likely.


RE: Transformers: Dark of the Moon - Hatcher- - Mar. 04, 2011

Personally I'm kinda happy that Megan Fox left Transformers. She was a really bad actress; hot yet horrible. Her role in the movie was also just for sex appeal as she had no real purpose in the plot. She was also antagonizing Michael Bay. I hope the Rosie Huntington is a good actress and that her role isn't in the movie for the sex appeal.


RE: Transformers: Dark of the Moon - Dude - Mar. 04, 2011

(Mar. 04, 2011  4:56 AM)Hatcher- Wrote: I hope the Rosie Huntington is a good actress and that her role isn't in the movie for the sex appeal.

I can't say either she's a good actress or not (Although one can hardly do worst than Megan Fox) but she is most certainly there for sex appeal.

Just type 'Rosie Huntington' on Goggle Image. You'll see what I mean.


RE: Transformers: Dark of the Moon - Pony - Mar. 05, 2011

Well, the whole purpose of the girlfriend is NOTHING. Dude, you are right, get rid of the humans and the movie would be so much cooler!!


RE: Transformers: Dark of the Moon - To - Mar. 05, 2011

(Mar. 05, 2011  1:45 AM)storm dranzer Wrote: Well, the whole purpose of the girlfriend is NOTHING. Dude, you are right, get rid of the humans and the movie would be so much cooler!!

When was the last successful teenage-aimed animated film?

Exactly.


RE: Transformers: Dark of the Moon - Raihan - Mar. 05, 2011

so Megan Fox is replaced, Why did she replaced?


RE: Transformers: Dark of the Moon - pegasis105rf - Mar. 05, 2011

No Megan Fox!
I'm not watching that!
The movie(transformers 2) itself was not good, but Megan Fox made it better!


RE: Transformers: Dark of the Moon - Hatcher- - Mar. 05, 2011

@ Raihan. She was uninterested in the franchise and has some beef with Michael Bay.

(Mar. 05, 2011  3:53 AM)pegasis105rf Wrote: No Megan Fox!
I'm not watching that!
The movie(transformers 2) itself was not good, but Megan Fox made it better!
The only reason I'd probably go watch the third part is because Megan Fox ISN'T in it.
While I do agree with you on the first part, you thought Megan Fox made it better? She was a mediocre actress that wasn't very interested in the project to begin with.


RE: Transformers: Dark of the Moon - Raihan - Mar. 05, 2011

i see, so Megan Fox uninterested in the franchise and has some beef with Michael Bay


RE: Transformers: Dark of the Moon - Ray Joker - Mar. 05, 2011

(Mar. 05, 2011  3:53 AM)pegasis105rf Wrote: No Megan Fox!
I'm not watching that!
The movie(transformers 2) itself was not good, but Megan Fox made it better!

get out

People who think Megan Fox makes Transformers good makes me laugh. She made Revenge of the Fallen even worse.

Watch Jennifer's Body for Megan Fox.


RE: Transformers: Dark of the Moon - Dude - Mar. 05, 2011

I'm okay with replacing Megan Fox, but they better have a damn good explanation for that, in the movie.

We're talking about a chick who stayed with Shia (Whom isn't exactly a sex-symbol) despite him leaving for college, being seen with another girl in bed and that's without mentionning risking her life because Shia is constantly involved with giant robots having a war for the entire planet. If this was just your average teenage relation, I think Megan would have left Shia around the time where the first giant robot threathened them.

She better not just leave him because she didn't love him anymore. The only way it could be good is if she dies. That'll create emotionnal torment for Shia and later bring the acceptance of moving on and be with another girl (i.e That new chick they're bringing)

But they probably won't go that way...


RE: Transformers: Dark of the Moon - Raihan - Mar. 05, 2011

so, who is the replacement of Megan fox ?


RE: Transformers: Dark of the Moon - Pony - Mar. 05, 2011

(Mar. 05, 2011  3:01 PM)Raihan Wrote: so, who is the replacement of Megan fox ?

Rosie Huntington.


RE: Transformers: Dark of the Moon - To - Mar. 05, 2011

(Mar. 05, 2011  2:56 PM)Dude Wrote: I'm okay with replacing Megan Fox, but they better have a damn good explanation for that, in the movie.

We're talking about a chick who stayed with Shia (Whom isn't exactly a sex-symbol) despite him leaving for college, being seen with another girl in bed and that's without mentionning risking her life because Shia is constantly involved with giant robots having a war for the entire planet. If this was just your average teenage relation, I think Megan would have left Shia around the time where the first giant robot threathened them.

She better not just leave him because she didn't love him anymore. The only way it could be good is if she dies. That'll create emotionnal torment for Shia and later bring the acceptance of moving on and be with another girl (i.e That new chick they're bringing)

But they probably won't go that way...

It was heavily rumored that Mikaela was to die in the beginning of this film. But then Megan Fox was shitcanned from production (even though she was at rehearsals) due to her not being healthy enough to do the stunt work required.


RE: Transformers: Dark of the Moon - Dude - Mar. 06, 2011

(Mar. 05, 2011  7:54 PM)To Wrote: But then Megan Fox was shitcanned from production (even though she was at rehearsals) due to her not being healthy enough to do the stunt work required.

Really, now? I thought she got shitcanned because she badmouthed the movie and insulted Micheal Bay (Which even I wouldn't do, If I was an actor in his movie)


RE: Transformers: Dark of the Moon - To - Mar. 07, 2011

No, her departure is really due to her health, but I'm sure the way she spoke about Bay didn't exactly entice him or Paramount to push shooting back for her to get healthy.