World Beyblade Organization by Fighting Spirits Inc.
What came first the chicken or the egg? - Printable Version

+- World Beyblade Organization by Fighting Spirits Inc. (https://worldbeyblade.org)
+-- Forum: Other (https://worldbeyblade.org/Forum-Other)
+--- Forum: Closed Threads (https://worldbeyblade.org/Forum-Closed-Threads)
+--- Thread: What came first the chicken or the egg? (/Thread-What-came-first-the-chicken-or-the-egg)



What came first the chicken or the egg? - JJsonickid - Nov. 26, 2010

i think the chicken because who laid the egg


RE: What came first the chicken or the egg? - Chaos Blader - Nov. 26, 2010

A more appropriate question would be: Evoloution or Creationism, but religious discussion isn't allowed...


RE: What came first the chicken or the egg? - finnthehuman - Nov. 26, 2010

the chocken came first cause if theres no chicken there would be no egg and the eggs would never hatch without the chicken to be there first


RE: What came first the chicken or the egg? - Pimpju - Nov. 26, 2010

Hah, no.

Technically, the egg would have had to come first. Two organisms similar to the chicken would have mated, and then due to genetic variation that occurs during fertilisation, the first chicken would have been born, in the egg.


RE: What came first the chicken or the egg? - Terra Blazer - Nov. 26, 2010

this question is un-answerable, as you need an egg to have a chicken, and a chicken to have an egg, so, when humans can find the true meaning of life, then i'll believe what they say came first


RE: What came first the chicken or the egg? - Cyanide - Nov. 26, 2010

by 100s of thousands of years of evolution came the chicken(by early creatures like the chicken so the egg),almost, basically what Momiji said,But if your about relgion the chicken :V easy question.....

rewritten to make some sense Tongue_out


RE: What came first the chicken or the egg? - Pimpju - Nov. 26, 2010

(Nov. 26, 2010  1:10 AM)alexscott12 Wrote: this question is un-answerable, as you need an egg to have a chicken, and a chicken to have an egg, so, when humans can find the true meaning of life, then i'll believe what they say came first

If you knew anything about Biology, you'd know that's wrong.


RE: What came first the chicken or the egg? - Cyanide - Nov. 26, 2010

yeah taking biology not doing to well in it i need to redo that again :T hopefully get it right this time or i can go ahead and tell i am going to fail my test, anyways....
haha though you were talking about me Tongue_out and theirs no delete post button........


RE: What came first the chicken or the egg? - Terra Blazer - Nov. 26, 2010

ok, you were right, I wasn't thinking there, and that's especially stupid considering we just finished a Biological Diversity unit in science.d'ohPinching_eyes_2


RE: What came first the chicken or the egg? - Soundwave - Nov. 26, 2010

(Nov. 26, 2010  12:28 AM)Chaos Blader Wrote: A more appropriate question would be: Evoloution or Creationism, but religious discussion isn't allowed...

your right, but of course it is the chicken because _________________ ( I have a 10% warning level and it doesn't need to go higher XD)


RE: What came first the chicken or the egg? - OkiBlaze - Nov. 26, 2010

(Nov. 26, 2010  1:09 AM)momiji manju Wrote: Hah, no.

Technically, the egg would have had to come first. Two organisms similar to the chicken would have mated, and then due to genetic variation that occurs during fertilisation, the first chicken would have been born, in the egg.

"Chicken" comes first in the question Tongue_out

But I digress.


RE: What came first the chicken or the egg? - Daegor42 - Nov. 26, 2010

Eggs were around in the age of dinosaurs. Chickens (and indeed all birds) evolved from dinosaurs. Ergo, the egg came first.

[/thread]


RE: What came first the chicken or the egg? - Kai-V - Nov. 26, 2010

(Nov. 26, 2010  2:43 AM)Daegor42 Wrote: Eggs were around in the age of dinosaurs. Chickens (and indeed all birds) evolved from dinosaurs. Ergo, the egg came first.

[/thread]
There is really nothing else to discuss about this, hah. If somebody thinks otherwise, then it is probable that we would get into a religious discussion ...