+- World Beyblade Organization by Fighting Spirits Inc. (https://worldbeyblade.org)
+-- Forum: Other (https://worldbeyblade.org/Forum-Other)
+--- Forum: Closed Threads (https://worldbeyblade.org/Forum-Closed-Threads)
+--- Thread: Battle Strikers Discussion (/Thread-Battle-Strikers-Discussion)
RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - kolosos666 - Apr. 23, 2011
wow, thats awesome, brad. so we have motorised launchers sorta for begginers, and hyper strike for experts
at least. thats how i see it!
RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - Bey5Star. - Apr. 25, 2011
I Think BS are Stronger...But Beyblades are COOLER And MORE AWSOME!!!
RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - To - Apr. 25, 2011
(Apr. 22, 2011 8:31 PM)Bey Brad Wrote: To, the Hyper-Strike and the Turbo Boost Launchers are both useable. The Hyper-Strike has a slightly higher maximum power ceiling, actually.
Welp, that sure kind of shuts me up...
RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - kolosos666 - Apr. 26, 2011
@Bey5Star.
Why do you guys even bother posting in here?! WE GET That you're not a fan of Battle Strikers, but this thread is for those who ARE fans. If you have a legit argument of why you don't like Battle Strikers(even then this isn't the place to put it, i say!), then sure, by all means post your thoughts. But don't just post 1 sentence just stating that Beyblade is better, it doesn't even make sense. So yah....just wanted to say that.
And also Brad, any chance you could tell us the top possible RPM with the Hyper Striker launchers?! Or does the TOP limit depend entirely on strength?!
RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - Bey Brad - Apr. 26, 2011
I don't the exact limit off the top of my head. When we were developing it we decided we wouldn't release it unless it could beat the Turbo Launchers, so we kept working on it till it did.
RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - lord Wolfblade - Apr. 26, 2011
i got to say, i love the idea and the look of battle strikers allot, but unfortunately i can't find any of them here...
RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - Ultimate - Apr. 26, 2011
(Apr. 26, 2011 2:58 PM)Bey Brad Wrote: I don't the exact limit off the top of my head. When we were developing it we decided we wouldn't release it unless it could beat the Turbo Launchers, so we kept working on it till it did.
AWESOME!...
It's just that the controller that you can attach to the launcher is really awkward when launching. I think it should have been at an angle.
RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - kolosos666 - Apr. 26, 2011
http://www.battlestrikers.com
What the hell....Can anyone explain why the site has been reverted back BEFORE the new releases?! NO Hyper Striker Launcher or any of the new tops
RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - Ultimate - Apr. 26, 2011
(Apr. 26, 2011 10:32 PM)kolosos666 Wrote: http://www.battlestrikers.com
What the hell....Can anyone explain why the site has been reverted back BEFORE the new releases?! NO Hyper Striker Launcher or any of the new tops
Ok........
Why did that happen?
Is there something wrong with the site or what is it......
RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - BeyPhilosopher - Apr. 27, 2011
http://www.battlestrikers.com/toys.php?series=XS&sku=29786B
Technical difficulties. A Rhino picture? Asleon XS on top?
RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - Gucci_Mane - Apr. 27, 2011
Like that site isn't crappy enough...
RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - Ultimate - Apr. 27, 2011
http://www.battlestrikers.com/toys.php?series=XS&sku=29895
Banshee and Pirahna........
WEIRD.
I hope they fix the problem.
EDIT: A lot of other things are screwed up too.
RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - Bey Brad - Apr. 27, 2011
Weird. We did some web upgrades so it looks like something went really wrong here. I'm at home now, I'll report it at the office tomorrow. Thanks guys!
Gucci_Mane, I think the Battle Strikers website is pretty great, what's wrong with it? (well, aside from the obvious right now)
I mean, hell, beyblade.com still redirects to YTV.
RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - Ultimate - Apr. 28, 2011
(Apr. 27, 2011 11:58 PM)Bey Brad Wrote: Weird. We did some web upgrades so it looks like something went really wrong here. I'm at home now, I'll report it at the office tomorrow. Thanks guys!
Gucci_Mane, I think the Battle Strikers website is pretty great, what's wrong with it? (well, aside from the obvious right now)
I mean, hell, beyblade.com still redirects to YTV.
Well the only problem I have with the site is when I go to toys or the customizer the pics are wrong e.g
Pyrotaur has a Balance tip but the picture is Super Control/Control+ tip,
Ninjitsu XS has a Rock booster but the picture is Sly booster
Pirahna XS has a Sly booster but the picture is Rock booster
there are more mistakes.
So looks like there's no new game?
RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - BeyPhilosopher - Apr. 28, 2011
I always thought that game was quite useless. But that's just me.
Anyway, the StrikerAxis site received more updates earlier than the BS site though.
RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - Bey Brad - Apr. 28, 2011
We're fixing the site now, thanks for letting me know!
RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - Ultimate - Apr. 28, 2011
Why isn't Viking FX on the predator team?
EDIT: I meant Paladin
RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - kolosos666 - Apr. 28, 2011
Well the site is fixed now, which is good news
Also Brad, any chance you might tell us why you upgraded the site?! Or is it a SURPRISE?!
RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - Bey Brad - Apr. 29, 2011
(Apr. 28, 2011 3:03 PM)Ultimate Wrote: Why isn't Viking FX on the predator team?
Because Vikings aren't animals?
Kolosos: No real reason, it was just outdated and we're catching up.
RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - Ultimate - Apr. 29, 2011
(Apr. 29, 2011 4:34 PM)Bey Brad Wrote:(Apr. 28, 2011 3:03 PM)Ultimate Wrote: Why isn't Viking FX on the predator team?
Because Vikings aren't animals?
Kolosos: No real reason, it was just outdated and we're catching up.
Sorry I meant Paladin,
why isn't he on the Paladin team on battlestrikers.com
RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - Bey Brad - Apr. 29, 2011
I think he ended up not being produced.
RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - Ultimate - Apr. 29, 2011
(Apr. 29, 2011 7:20 PM)Bey Brad Wrote: I think he ended up not being produced.
But each team has 2 FX strikers except Paladin........
It just seems a little weird.
(Apr. 26, 2011 8:49 PM)Ultimate Wrote:Is their no way to adjust the angle of the controller?(Apr. 26, 2011 2:58 PM)Bey Brad Wrote: I don't the exact limit off the top of my head. When we were developing it we decided we wouldn't release it unless it could beat the Turbo Launchers, so we kept working on it till it did.
AWESOME!...
It's just that the controller that you can attach to the launcher is really awkward when launching. I think it should have been at an angle.
RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - AnnieDuck - Apr. 30, 2011
How many versions of THE GRIZZ were released?
RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - Ultimate - Apr. 30, 2011
(Apr. 30, 2011 6:25 AM)AnnieDuck Wrote: How many versions of THE GRIZZ were released?
I'm sure there's only one GRIZZ and he's from Series 2.
http://www.battlestrikers.com/blogDescription.php?blog_id=12&status=comment
He's a limited striker.
http://www.battlestrikers.com/toys.php?series=XS&sku=29895
Look at the parts of the two strikers they're wrong.
I know it's not very important,
but it just looks weird, the site doesn't know what strikers have what parts.
RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - AnnieDuck - Apr. 30, 2011
THE GRIZZ will always be my favourite. <3