![]() |
Wing Discussion - Printable Version +- World Beyblade Organization (https://worldbeyblade.org) +-- Forum: Beyblade Discussion (https://worldbeyblade.org/Forum-Beyblade-Discussion) +--- Forum: Beyblade Customizations (https://worldbeyblade.org/Forum-Beyblade-Customizations) +---- Forum: Metal Fight Customizations (https://worldbeyblade.org/Forum-Metal-Fight-Customizations) +---- Thread: Wing Discussion (/Thread-Wing-Discussion) |
RE: Wing Discussion - Bleik - Dec. 25, 2011 I get it. I just took a long time to post so I didnt see your last message RE: Wing Discussion - Hov - Dec. 25, 2011 Don't forget about the Modes of Wing also. There is the 0 mode, 1, and 2 mode. Each of them as different levels of recoil. Mode 1 had the most recoil, but like like good recoil, I'm talking low recoil though. I am still testing MF-H Wing PegasisCh120RF as an attack combo. I still have high hopes for it. RE: Wing Discussion - Dan - Dec. 25, 2011 Post up some results, then! Prove your hopes. RE: Wing Discussion - Hov - Dec. 25, 2011 I will when I get back home from Christmas Dinner. You should've seen it knocking Duo around like a rag doll but no actual KO or stadium out ![]() RE: Wing Discussion - Dan - Dec. 25, 2011 Many 4D wheels surpass BD145's diameter, that is no longer unique. No KO's? Shame. RE: Wing Discussion - Jaygrazer - Dec. 26, 2011 Theres no contact point big enough to do a KO. And I will post everyone's testing in the OP. That needs to be a standard, instead of countless pages of discussion rather than testing that we want to see. Just a random thought. RE: Wing Discussion - Dan - Dec. 26, 2011 Yeah, discussing the piece's ability is dumb! TESTING!!!!!!! You should be keeping track and adding the tests given constantly. Probably best you catalog them under specific combinations. (I.E MF-H Wing Pegasis CH120R2F with a spoiler and a bunch of tests compiled by yourself) OP's responsibility. Don't complain. Promote testing constantly, but don't put down discussion unless it is plain useless. (I.E "my wing can't KO basalt" or something which doesn't have insight.) RE: Wing Discussion - Jaygrazer - Dec. 26, 2011 I was just critizing looking through all that afterwards, not suppressing discussion itself. But I agree 100%. OP Done updating. RE: Wing Discussion - Relic - Dec. 26, 2011 (Dec. 24, 2011 6:31 PM)Glowfire1 Wrote: yeah okay than make the test with vari ares and both cs or that which you mean has better defense capbillities Sorry, I didn't get you. Can you specify the exact combos ? RE: Wing Discussion - Hov - Dec. 28, 2011 DF105 One of the Most Underrated tracks makes a comeback! Standard Procedures MF-H Wing PeggyDF105RF vs MF-H Duo Aquario230RDF Wing(13KOs) Duo(7 outspins) IMO I think DF105 should be an top tier attack track and might be the only attack track for Wing. Plus, i'm still waiting on my TH170 I ordered as an birthday present. If anyone wants comparison, help yourself. EDIT: Wing was in 1 Mode. RE: Wing Discussion - Ga' - Dec. 28, 2011 DF105? Could you try LW105 then? The 3-sided wheel might work well with the 3 wings of LW105. DF105 would add extra weight, I guess. KO's? Dayum son. I like those tests. RE: Wing Discussion - Hov - Dec. 28, 2011 Sure! Considering that LW105 wings expand more than DF105. It might just work. KOing like Mike Tyson son ![]() ![]() RE: Wing Discussion - Glowfire1 - Dec. 28, 2011 Relic I meaned : MF-H Wing Pegasis (0 mode) BD145CS/MB vs. MF-H Blitz Unicorno/ Vari Ares ch120/s130 R²F/ RF RE: Wing Discussion - Yami - Dec. 28, 2011 Meh did some testing Slandered testing Duo was banked Wing was Slide shoot or my Slide Shoot Style ![]() MF-M Wing PegasusIII LW105RF Vs MF-H Duo Uranus TH170RDF WP:5 KO DU: 15 OS Wing Percentage: 25% LW105 with Wing didn't do much work at all Testing 2 Same as Above MF-M Wing PegasusIII DF105RF Vs MF-H Duo Uranus TH170RDF WP:12 KO 1 OS 1 Wing Uppercut KO xD (14) DU: 5 OS 1 CKO (6) Once again DF105 fits Wing perfectly ![]() @J o n Test DF105 on Blitz since mine committed suicide ![]() RE: Wing Discussion - Hov - Dec. 28, 2011 LOLOLOLOLOL. Okiee! Thanks for the test Galaxy. May your ex-wife Blitz Unicorno Meyer R.I.P RE: Wing Discussion - Yami - Dec. 28, 2011 (Dec. 28, 2011 9:03 PM)J o n Wrote: LOLOLOLOLOL. Okiee! Thanks for the test Galaxy. May your ex-wife Blitz Unicorno Meyer R.I.PAmen.... @Glow Y U NO BEAT IN TESTING?! RE: Wing Discussion - Dan - Dec. 28, 2011 Really cool guys, now test against Duo BD145CS. RE: Wing Discussion - Hov - Dec. 28, 2011 Don't have BD145 ![]() RE: Wing Discussion - Yami - Dec. 28, 2011 Challenge testing #1 MF-M Wing PegasusIII DF105RF (Mode1) Vs MF-H Duo Uranus BD145CS (my Cs finally Defensive/Calm) (S Mode) WP: 13 KO 2 BDSKO(15} DU: 15 OS Wing Winning Percentage: 50% Did Additional 10 round to see difference all tied up ![]() RE: Wing Discussion - th!nk - Dec. 28, 2011 If you're going to do DF105 tests and push it this hard, I expect additional comparative tests with normal 105 and 100 tracks will be forthcoming? On whichever wheel you feel most appropriate, post it in whichever thread. RE: Wing Discussion - Dan - Dec. 28, 2011 I can vouch for DF105 being very competent, I tested it when it first came out and it did better than any of the other low tracks (85, 90, 100, 105). I was going to make a thread about it that same time, but I couldn't get enough people to help provide some tests for it, on top of my own, that is. RE: Wing Discussion - Hov - Dec. 28, 2011 Same here. I beleive the wings on DF105 helps the MW be more stable or you can say balance and more accurate? RE: Wing Discussion - th!nk - Dec. 28, 2011 I'm sceptical, I don't see how such tiny wings would improve a track's performance so dramatically, especially one renowned for being "meh". |