(Mar. 04, 2011  10:54 PM)Chupa Chups Wrote: Shame there is Not really any testing we Can do to Prove anything on This Topic.

(Mar. 02, 2011  7:12 PM)Bluezee Wrote:

(Mar. 02, 2011  4:20 PM)momiji manju Wrote: to be fair the only unorthodox part is M145.

It is also the most vital piece of the combo and the reason why it works.

---

If that's the case then how come all the other parts are well known for attack?

Surely their attack properties also contribute to the combo's success.

M145 would add weight, and an erratic nature to it's movement.

(Mar. 02, 2011  7:12 PM)Bluezee Wrote: [quote='Cye Kinomiya' pid='564531' dateline='1299088367']
Then how come you didn't win Battle of the Boroughs 2?

I can vouch for her and say if she had not lost to ikmv with a combo that got stuck under the track, I am absolutely sure she would have been facing me in the final match of the tournament. Also, as far as I know, she used the combo only once and it destroyed the opposition with ease. That top-tier combo looked like trash when it went up against hers. The final match could have gone either way with us especially considering we both had other combos up our sleeves. I didnt use my usual test combo any more than once in the tournament which was against ikmv in the semi-finals even though that one just gives me easy wins. I was actually planning to use my others for a change.

(Mar. 05, 2011  2:39 AM)momiji manju Wrote:

(Mar. 02, 2011  7:12 PM)Bluezee Wrote:

(Mar. 02, 2011  4:20 PM)momiji manju Wrote: to be fair the only unorthodox part is M145.

It is also the most vital piece of the combo and the reason why it works.

---

If that's the case then how come all the other parts are well known for attack?

Surely their attack properties also contribute to the combo's success.

M145 would add weight, and an erratic nature to it's movement.

(Mar. 02, 2011  7:12 PM)Bluezee Wrote: [quote='Cye Kinomiya' pid='564531' dateline='1299088367']
Then how come you didn't win Battle of the Boroughs 2?

I can vouch for her and say if she had not lost to ikmv with a combo that got stuck under the track, I am absolutely sure she would have been facing me in the final match of the tournament. Also, as far as I know, she used the combo only once and it destroyed the opposition with ease. That top-tier combo looked like trash when it went up against hers. The final match could have gone either way with us especially considering we both had other combos up our sleeves. I didnt use my usual test combo any more than once in the tournament which was against ikmv in the semi-finals even though that one just gives me easy wins. I was actually planning to use my others for a change.

i get that you can make great combos/have god like launches that are always gattyakis/sliding shoots etc, but can't you see how you come off as conceited?

I mean, to argue that "No, I am so good at launching I can defeat anything with my combo as it is designed to defeat everything" isn't exactly a legitimate argument without statistics and results.

Not to mention your unfounded hate of top tier combos as though they're "trash".

Can't you see that in the end of the day, if your opponent stopped to think for even one second, it's pretty simple to avoid any of your gattyakis, and if they saw a few of your matches, your secret combo could probably be countered with an appropriate top tier combo.

But wait, it's designed to defeat everything.

(Mar. 05, 2011  4:40 AM)momiji manju Wrote: So I suppose the "It's designed to counter all top tiers" and other such lines are completely humble?

In the end of the day, you launch, and that's the end of it.

The skill needed for this game could be learnt in a week if someone kept at it.

(Mar. 05, 2011  4:58 AM)SSJfisherman Wrote: there's something i would like to say.
this isnt related to the posts above me.

combos such as the one that was MF rock bull m145 es can beat a specific combo.
lets just say it can beat burn bull 145 wd.
but it can only do that if you know exactly what you're facing.
it could be completely destroyed by all other combos.

so, the other person(mf rock bull m145 es) starts laying down the law; pulls out some deception.
now they make the rules(not literally) and they're in control.
they use the combo, and win.

but what if the you aren't an idiot.
here: bam, the other person(mf rock bull m145 es) is trying to decieve. you see him/her waiting a tiny bit, so you decide to do the same, so you dont get stuck in a bad situation. bam, stalling clause. now the other person(mf rock bull m145 es) is in a pickle. they have no clue what the other person will use. huge odds are for the you.

so combos like that MF rock bull m145 es are a two way street.
you could screw over the opponent, or get screwed over.

(Mar. 05, 2011  5:04 AM)SSJfisherman Wrote: yep, buts not just assume that the other person has no launching technique

(Mar. 05, 2011  4:54 AM)Bluezee Wrote:

(Mar. 05, 2011  4:40 AM)momiji manju Wrote: So I suppose the "It's designed to counter all top tiers" and other such lines are completely humble?

In the end of the day, you launch, and that's the end of it.

The skill needed for this game could be learnt in a week if someone kept at it.

Did I not just say the combo is not mine and I am not the person who said that? Again, you have not read. Maybe you should come see for yourself and stop trying to downplay something that you have never experienced for yourself.