(Aug. 30, 2008  3:32 PM)Nic Wrote:

(Aug. 30, 2008  7:04 AM)Anubis Wrote:

(Aug. 30, 2008  7:02 AM)Bey Brad Wrote:

(Aug. 30, 2008  7:01 AM)Anubis Wrote:

(Aug. 30, 2008  6:58 AM)Bey Brad Wrote: But does the size affect the maximum RPM? Isn't that dependent entirely on the shooter?

It will affect the max RPM when we shoot because we only have a limited time to build the force up. With a larger mass to spin, we cannot accelerate the mass to the same speed as a smaller mass in a short time. The smaller mass will spin faster because there is less resistance.

Thanks for clearing this up for me.

No problem <3~

I don't know if a very large mass can reach the same RPM as a very small mass with the same power source with as much time as it needed to spin up. For example, a test run with a large motor. This is a question of physics that needs to be investigated. The key to that question was the short time we had to actually accelerate the mass!

Don't forget to consider the resistance of the shooter as well, and the efficiency of the user's muscles. These are very variable variables.

Hmm you're saying if time isn't an issue, but both are using the same power source, can both reach the same maximum rpm? I would think a lighter one would reach a higher rpm, if assuming the air resistance is similar, if you deliver the same power to it, because of the smaller mass, it'll be easier to speed up and overcome resistance. But this is really unrealistic... except maybe in the MFB arcade game thing.

I'm feeling like there's something missing from this, but I'm half asleep now and don't feel like thinking too much into it.

(Aug. 31, 2008  4:30 AM)Blue Wrote: perfect.
I'll write up a hypothesis(lol overkill)

hey Anubis do you think launching Bull first has a bearing on the outcome?
perhaps it be worth swaping the launch order halfway to null any descrepancies?

(Aug. 31, 2008  10:11 AM)mightyboosh9 Wrote: hi everyone i just realized at the moment with the four mfbs there are 48 different combinations not including the faces, i didnt count them because they have nothing to do with performance

(Aug. 31, 2008  12:15 PM)Bey Brad Wrote: haha carp no i'm an idiot it is 48

(Aug. 31, 2008  3:26 PM)Rögnvaldur Wrote: So the mfb beyblades are called the horoscope series, am i right?

If so than how do you think the capricorn will look like?

(Aug. 31, 2008  5:44 PM)James Wrote: I just realized somthing... Since many people wont know about MFB untill the anime comes out does that mean that we will be automaticly be like 6 months ahead of the pack?

Also that will mean that we will already have some of the best combo's ever devised thought out!!!

(Aug. 31, 2008  6:05 AM)Sega Wrote: Great pictures Kei

Yeah it really does look like the MFB Blades will be the least superior in my opinion, seriously the Track and Tip's barely weigh anything and just using the Attack ring for its source of weight is pretty stupid in my opinion and ontop of the bad shooter its not really looking too good in my opinion, Im hoping they can add more layers to the blades throughout its run.

(Aug. 31, 2008  9:24 PM)Spinster Wrote:

(Aug. 31, 2008  6:05 AM)Sega Wrote: Great pictures Kei

Yeah it really does look like the MFB Blades will be the least superior in my opinion, seriously the Track and Tip's barely weigh anything and just using the Attack ring for its source of weight is pretty stupid in my opinion and ontop of the bad shooter its not really looking too good in my opinion, Im hoping they can add more layers to the blades throughout its run.

In my opinion, the only real downside to this design in the shooter. Take a good hard look at your blades. Absolutely NO previous series has been built tighter or more solidly than these. There is absolutely no rattle whatsoever, which means no momentum lost to internal friction. Yes, the tracks and bottoms are fairly unimpressive at the moment, but does anyone remember the original four HMS Running Cores? Aside from Grip Flat, does anyone use the others at all? I strongly suspect there will be a great deal of variation on the bottoms in the near future, and I can't really say either way for the tracks, but I could see the potential for certain gimmicks to be added at a later date. The only other complaint I have is the inability to change spin direction right now. However, practically speaking, this can make for more solid, fast paced tournament play. If both players already know the spin direction of their opponent, there's none of the intense "which direction is he going to go for" psych out period that, to an extent, bogged down HMS play. What MFB is, as it stands, is an updated, back-to-basics approach to high-performance, competitive spinning tops. I, for one, look forward to the progression of this reboot.

(Sep. 01, 2008  1:58 AM)-WOLF- Wrote: can someone please make a vid where bull has a low track, because that could be a killer combo and i dont have mfb so i cant try it

thanks