![]() |
Random Thoughts 5 - READ RULES IN FIRST POST - Printable Version +- World Beyblade Organization (https://worldbeyblade.org) +-- Forum: Off-Topic Forums (https://worldbeyblade.org/Forum-Off-Topic-Forums) +--- Forum: General Discussion (https://worldbeyblade.org/Forum-General-Discussion) +--- Thread: Random Thoughts 5 - READ RULES IN FIRST POST (/Thread-Random-Thoughts-5-READ-RULES-IN-FIRST-POST) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
|
RE: Random Thoughts 5 - READ RULES IN FIRST POST - Neo - Dec. 27, 2015 Welp, looking through this akneemay knorrth shtuff, gotta buy pre-registration stuff soon, I guess. RE: Random Thoughts 5 - READ RULES IN FIRST POST - Meta madness - Dec. 28, 2015 I was put back in, in the wbo skype chat tonight. Got the boot but hey got the 33 names for the big post, thanks Jimmy. RE: Random Thoughts 5 - READ RULES IN FIRST POST - MissingNo. - Dec. 28, 2015 there's a wbo skype chat ? well i hate you guys RE: Random Thoughts 5 - READ RULES IN FIRST POST - Neo - Dec. 28, 2015 (Dec. 28, 2015 3:05 AM)MissingNo. Wrote: there's a wbo skype chat ? well everyone left after i was invited after being kicked after the first time i was added also theyre making an backup chat so probably wanna pm someone to get into that RE: Random Thoughts 5 - READ RULES IN FIRST POST - MissingNo. - Dec. 28, 2015 Why did you got kicked ? Because of your edgyness, I guess ? RE: Random Thoughts 5 - READ RULES IN FIRST POST - Neo - Dec. 28, 2015 (Dec. 28, 2015 3:18 AM)MissingNo. Wrote: Why did you got kicked ? Because of your edgyness, I guess ? nope canadians want to punch me so RE: Random Thoughts 5 - READ RULES IN FIRST POST - MissingNo. - Dec. 28, 2015 Oh, you don't like maple syrup, right ? RE: Random Thoughts 5 - READ RULES IN FIRST POST - Meta madness - Dec. 28, 2015 (Dec. 28, 2015 3:05 AM)MissingNo. Wrote: there's a wbo skype chat ? It's going through a major reform, all went to a newer chat. Poor Neo.. RE: Random Thoughts 5 - READ RULES IN FIRST POST - Neo - Dec. 28, 2015 (Dec. 28, 2015 3:27 AM)MissingNo. Wrote: Oh, you don't like maple syrup, right ? nah i do actually had waffles yesterday for breakfast Anyways, people hate- i mean dislike me because they think im in cahoots with this meta madness guy RE: Random Thoughts 5 - READ RULES IN FIRST POST - Meta madness - Dec. 28, 2015 we never talk anyway. RE: Random Thoughts 5 - READ RULES IN FIRST POST - Kai-V - Dec. 28, 2015 Unnecessary drama, in my opinion. In any case, good thing there is at least one person here not affected and not hating anyone at all. RE: Random Thoughts 5 - READ RULES IN FIRST POST - Meta madness - Dec. 28, 2015 I solely agree. in other news, I've been trying to patch up things with someone here. Though in time when they're up for it, I'll try to get it on a better street with us. RE: Random Thoughts 5 - READ RULES IN FIRST POST - Calculator Carp - Dec. 28, 2015 (Dec. 28, 2015 3:36 AM)Kai-V Wrote: Unnecessary drama, in my opinion. In any case, good thing there is at least one person here not affected and not hating anyone at all. Late to the party. Could you please inform me on what happened? RE: Random Thoughts 5 - READ RULES IN FIRST POST - DRAGON KING - Dec. 28, 2015 This thread is getting trashy RE: Random Thoughts 5 - READ RULES IN FIRST POST - Meta madness - Dec. 28, 2015 it's been there for a while m8. RE: Random Thoughts 5 - READ RULES IN FIRST POST - DRAGON KING - Dec. 28, 2015 Why can't we go back to bread puns. I knead some puns. RE: Random Thoughts 5 - READ RULES IN FIRST POST - Wizard - Dec. 28, 2015 (Dec. 28, 2015 4:48 AM)DRAGON KING EX Wrote: Why can't we go back to bread puns. I was really enjoying that, but I ran out of puns far too soon into the game. Btw, if this post gets 1000 likes Brad will officially change his profile name to Bread. RE: Random Thoughts 5 - READ RULES IN FIRST POST - Angry Face - Dec. 28, 2015 1000 Likes (Click to View) RE: Random Thoughts 5 - READ RULES IN FIRST POST - Wizard - Dec. 28, 2015 (Dec. 28, 2015 5:03 AM)Angry Face Wrote: @[Bey Brad] It's time. RE: Random Thoughts 5 - READ RULES IN FIRST POST - Calculator Carp - Dec. 28, 2015 (Dec. 28, 2015 4:48 AM)DRAGON KING EX Wrote: Why can't we go back to bread puns. I can't provide you with puns, but I can provide you with dank meme breadbear brought to you by the bad part of the FNaF fandom. Breadbear (Dec. 28, 2015 5:03 AM)Angry Face Wrote: Too many carps were given for this. RE: Random Thoughts 5 - READ RULES IN FIRST POST - Wizard - Dec. 28, 2015 (Dec. 28, 2015 5:59 AM)Calculator Carp Wrote: Too many carps were given for this. Magikarp ![]() RE: Random Thoughts 5 - READ RULES IN FIRST POST - RagerBlade - Dec. 28, 2015 (Dec. 27, 2015 6:25 AM)*Ginga* Wrote: They still suck as a team. The Giants are better overall, but simply put the Redskins were giving a blessing of a schedule in comparison.And that's why the Redskins beat the Giants. The Redskins have always had a pretty nice team. They just never produced results. The Redskins are playing really well as a team right now. That's the reason we excelled. You reall can't say the Giants are better when they can't beat us. They really don't have a "great" team that can match against any other playoff teams. Neither do the Redskins, but they're much closer than the Giants are at this point. RE: Random Thoughts 5 - READ RULES IN FIRST POST - Meta madness - Dec. 28, 2015 Time for the green light RE: Random Thoughts 5 - READ RULES IN FIRST POST - *Ginga* - Dec. 28, 2015 (Dec. 28, 2015 5:28 PM)RagerBlade Wrote: And that's why the Redskins beat the Giants. The Redskins have always had a pretty nice team. They just never produced results. The Redskins are playing really well as a team right now. That's the reason we excelled. You really can't say the Giants are better when they can't beat us. They really don't have a "great" team that can match against any other playoff teams. Neither do the Redskins, but they're much closer than the Giants are at this point.Actually the Giants and the Redskins split the two games they played against each other. Additionally, the Giants came the closest to beating the undefeated Patriots (at the time), as well as the Panthers (at the time). You're racist team can't say the same. RE: Random Thoughts 5 - READ RULES IN FIRST POST - RagerBlade - Dec. 28, 2015 (Dec. 28, 2015 5:55 PM)*Ginga* Wrote:Yeah but when it counted who got the job done? That's right the Skins. Doesn't matter if they were close on beating them, because they lost. The Skins are in the playoffs and the Giants can stay in New York. We beat them when we needed to and I'm sure we could do it again.(Dec. 28, 2015 5:28 PM)RagerBlade Wrote: And that's why the Redskins beat the Giants. The Redskins have always had a pretty nice team. They just never produced results. The Redskins are playing really well as a team right now. That's the reason we excelled. You really can't say the Giants are better when they can't beat us. They really don't have a "great" team that can match against any other playoff teams. Neither do the Redskins, but they're much closer than the Giants are at this point.Actually the Giants and the Redskins split the two games they played against each other. Additionally, the Giants came the closest to beating the undefeated Patriots (at the time), as well as the Panthers (at the time). You're racist team can't say the same. |