(Aug. 05, 2017  2:30 AM)Shaady Wrote:

(Aug. 05, 2017  2:24 AM)Bastillon Wrote: You DO realize that not everyone has a credit card right?

You don't need a credit card to shop on ebay.

(Aug. 05, 2017  2:02 AM)Ultra Wrote:

(Aug. 05, 2017  1:21 AM)Bastillon Wrote: While true, I heavily doubt that mG is as prone to bursting in normal circumstances. If it successfully resists bursting by dF, one of the best stationary burst attack layers right now, then I will expect that mG is at least powerful enough to exist in the metagame without any real resistance besides lS, and most layers would fail to burst it. And I meant D2 being easier to burst and KO in comparison with mG.
Because it's totally fair that almost every single meta combo relies on Atomic, a part currently only available in random boosters, and other people who aren't lucky enough would have to wait for the re-release in customized bey *3 + launcher box (which is way more expensive and has a soon ™ slapped on it) or maybe in another regular booster (lol gl with that). It's pretty much the only reason why I've been stuck in a limbo for so long. I just can't test anything anymore without someone casually throwing around "what about __Atomic?" and stuff, and I pretty much "exiled" myself because I still haven't succeeded in defeating dFSR without the new lS.

You can get Atomic in the individual beyblade on ebay for $25 shipped right now. If you really can't afford to spend that then beyblade probably isn't the right hobby for you.

(Aug. 05, 2017  6:08 AM)Bersilus Wrote:

(Aug. 05, 2017  2:02 AM)Ultra Wrote: You can get Atomic in the individual beyblade on ebay for $25 shipped right now. If you really can't afford to spend that then beyblade probably isn't the right hobby for you.

Do send me a link

(Aug. 05, 2017  8:18 AM)mj9 Wrote:

(Aug. 05, 2017  6:08 AM)Bersilus Wrote: Do send me a link

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Beyblade-Burst-B-80-Random-Booster-vol-6-02-Ikshid-Ivirui-G-At-with-tracking-/112421994463?hash=item1a2cdf7fdf:g:IPcAAOSw9OFZKgjv

(Aug. 08, 2017  9:57 AM)chips556 Wrote: mG +  anything other than stock mG god chip/metal god chip has been banned from TT's official tournaments,  thoughts ?

(Aug. 08, 2017  9:57 AM)chips556 Wrote: mG +  anything other than stock mG god chip/metal god chip has been banned from TT's official tournaments,  thoughts ?

(Aug. 08, 2017  5:07 PM)XYZ-Jaden Wrote: Wait, so why is mG+other god chips banned? What difference does another bey's god chip make?

(Aug. 08, 2017  5:48 PM)1234beyblade Wrote: If you put an A mold god chip on mG it becomes as tight as a Hasbro beyblade with takara tomy drivers.

(Aug. 08, 2017  7:24 PM)Mage Wrote:

(Aug. 08, 2017  5:48 PM)1234beyblade Wrote: If you put an A mold god chip on mG it becomes as tight as a Hasbro beyblade with takara tomy drivers.

I think marutti posted a photo of a poster that said that only mG's god chip and the metal god chip may be used on mG

(Aug. 08, 2017  8:55 PM)Jack112233 Wrote: but just how powerful is garuda considering the burst percentage

(Aug. 08, 2017  10:05 PM)mj9 Wrote:

(Aug. 08, 2017  8:55 PM)Jack112233 Wrote: but just how powerful is garuda considering the burst percentage

Despite it having bad teeth it's still nerds most attack layers

(Aug. 09, 2017  5:35 AM)1234beyblade Wrote: Just gonna post this here, take it how you want it.

Stationary Valk is a pretty good counter to it in deck format because you only need to win 1/3 matches to make the score tied since it will most likely be by a burst.  lS was kinda a disappointment, I thought it was going to eat mG for breakfast.  Anyway aside from attack gK does eat it for breakfast as predicted, though do I think mG is OP?  Yes, it's very hard to get around it (should mention VHR only works with a crazy hard launch, so it will obviously not work for everyone) and is basically the D2 of the current meta where it only has two known effective combos against it (VHR and gKHR for mG and MKZ and DHR for D2).

(Aug. 09, 2017  5:35 AM)1234beyblade Wrote: Stationary Valk is a pretty good counter to it in deck format because you only need to win 1/3 matches to make the score tied since it will most likely be by a burst.  lS was kinda a disappointment, I thought it was going to eat mG for breakfast.  Anyway aside from attack gK does eat it for breakfast as predicted, though do I think mG is OP?  Yes, it's very hard to get around it (should mention VHR only works with a crazy hard launch, so it will obviously not work for everyone) and is basically the D2 of the current meta where it only has two known effective combos against it (VHR and gKHR for mG and MKZ and DHR for D2).

(Aug. 10, 2017  2:36 AM)Bastillon Wrote:

(Aug. 09, 2017  5:35 AM)1234beyblade Wrote: Stationary Valk is a pretty good counter to it in deck format because you only need to win 1/3 matches to make the score tied since it will most likely be by a burst.  lS was kinda a disappointment, I thought it was going to eat mG for breakfast.  Anyway aside from attack gK does eat it for breakfast as predicted, though do I think mG is OP?  Yes, it's very hard to get around it (should mention VHR only works with a crazy hard launch, so it will obviously not work for everyone) and is basically the D2 of the current meta where it only has two known effective combos against it (VHR and gKHR for mG and MKZ and DHR for D2).

To be fair, though, the lS in your video just seems to miss the flower pattern a lot, either overshooting it or just way too small to even hit the center, so I'm not quite sure if lS is really that bad, considering the test results on the lS thread. But I'm a bit curious about gK.

(Aug. 10, 2017  2:54 AM)1234beyblade Wrote:

(Aug. 10, 2017  2:36 AM)Bastillon Wrote: To be fair, though, the lS in your video just seems to miss the flower pattern a lot, either overshooting it or just way too small to even hit the center, so I'm not quite sure if lS is really that bad, considering the test results on the lS thread. But I'm a bit curious about gK.

The Xtreme was too worn for lS in this vid, so eventhough we launched hard it still seemed like it was slow.

(Aug. 10, 2017  2:36 AM)Bastillon Wrote:

(Aug. 09, 2017  5:35 AM)1234beyblade Wrote: Stationary Valk is a pretty good counter to it in deck format because you only need to win 1/3 matches to make the score tied since it will most likely be by a burst.  lS was kinda a disappointment, I thought it was going to eat mG for breakfast.  Anyway aside from attack gK does eat it for breakfast as predicted, though do I think mG is OP?  Yes, it's very hard to get around it (should mention VHR only works with a crazy hard launch, so it will obviously not work for everyone) and is basically the D2 of the current meta where it only has two known effective combos against it (VHR and gKHR for mG and MKZ and DHR for D2).

To be fair, though, the lS in your video just seems to miss the flower pattern a lot, either overshooting it or just way too small to even hit the center, so I'm not quite sure if lS is really that bad, considering the test results on the lS thread. But I'm a bit curious about gK.

(Aug. 10, 2017  2:26 PM)Kai-V Wrote: ~Mana~ posted some highly contrasting results in the Legend Spriggan topic, from what I recall. Always look at all tests posted in a topic, not just those in the first message.