I would like to start off by saying that I am very happy with the writers topic, a non-beyblade story. there is nothing wrong with beyblade stories, and yes it makes life harder for reviewers trying to compare stories. However this shows the writers imagination is not limited to one style, and this is always are good starting point. Now onto the good and bad of the story, i'll start with the good. The topic. The topic of the story is something that has been done before in a sense, but the addition of the cards and weapon styles are original. the design of the weapons intrigued me because the way he described it left it so alot of things could happen related to it. The names. Names are one of the first things I look at in a story. If the names are too cheesy or related to the object I often find it puts me off reading the story. An interesting name has to be simple and that is exactly how it is in this story.

Now for the bad. Spelling and grammar. There are some minor spelling mistakes in the story that should be easy to spot, spell checking is often a good idea. I recommend typing it in word then copy and paste when finalised. Grammar, not so bad, some parts that don't seem to make sense in the story but generally ok. Description. Description needs improving in this story. Mainly there being a lack of it. I felt like parts of the story could have been improved greatly if they were described in every minute little detail for example:

'It feels like someone is forcing itself to fuse into me. I scream and shout, and after a few moments. It finally ends. I see my hands blazing with some blue abstract energy. I look into the mirror. My eyes has somehow changed from Black to Mako and my hair has white strips on it. I look back and hear voices, guards appear outside the door.'

this sentence has minor description, however similes/metaphors could have been used in several places, and another thing is sentence starters. the sentences mainly begin with I or My, which are dull words that could be changed to not have them at all.

so time for rating:

characters: 8/10
the characters have clear structure and their attitudes are easy to interpret each one being different to each other. their personalities are clear and can be used in many ways.

Idea: 6/10
so far the idea seems to be partially however it is quite early in the story and there could be many developments to change this.

description: 5/10
the description could be there but it isn't, the opportunities are clear and could easily be added.

overall: 7/10
so far the story is intriguing, however action scenes could be enhanced and more description as I say, minor spelling and grammar mistakes should be fixed. characters and some ideas are very imaginative and I will be happy to read this story again.