Beywiki Photo thread - Printable Version +- World Beyblade Organization by Fighting Spirits Inc. (https://worldbeyblade.org) +-- Forum: Beyblade Discussion (https://worldbeyblade.org/Forum-Beyblade-Discussion) +--- Forum: Beyblade Wiki (https://worldbeyblade.org/Forum-Beyblade-Wiki) +---- Forum: Approved Drafts (https://worldbeyblade.org/Forum-Approved-Drafts) +---- Thread: Beywiki Photo thread (/Thread-Beywiki-Photo-thread) |
RE: Beywiki Photo thread - Nocto - Aug. 11, 2012 Make yourself some basic walls with taped sheets of paper on them. Light reflects on the white paper and dims the shadows. Raise your exposure to compensate for the large amount of white, and always use the custom White Balance setting (adjust it too, of course). --------------------- Compact Launchers (Click to View) Zero-G Launcher Grip (Click to View) Zero-G Launcher Grip Draft Wrote:The Zero-G Launcher Grip is the third version of Metal Fight Beyblade Grips. It is composed of two parts: Handle and Head.--------------------- Dark Knight Dragooon LW160BSF Dragooon: 30.90 grams Dark Knight: 3.87 grams Left Wing 160: 2.36 grams Blade Semi-Flat: 1.19 grams The Crystal Wheel pictures are what they are, really... Something worth noting (BSF's Semi-Flat is larger than SF's): (Click to View) I'll also re-take, hopefully soon, the pictures in my previous set (Draciel G, Gaia Dragoon G and Tornado Attack). The light bulb I normally used shattered, and the one I took until I could get a replacement was less than adequate. And while many of you might not have noticed, the color discrepancies really do irk me. RE: Beywiki Photo thread - Kai-V - Aug. 11, 2012 You can go ahead and upload all those photographs on Beywiki, especially if there is a place to add them right now. It is not really on-topic, but here are some minor edits : Quote:The Zero-G Launcher Grip is the third version of Metal Fight Beyblade Grips. It is composed of two parts: a handle and a head. RE: Beywiki Photo thread - Blader98 - Aug. 13, 2012 Big Bang Pegasis F http://s1246.photobucket.com/albums/gg610/jvdr98/Big%20Bang%20Pegasis/ I shot top views and side views in all 4 modes and the Big Bang wheel in all 4 modes. I only took one bottom view picture of the bey, however, I can take bottom views of the bey in all modes if needed. I also included every part separately. RE: Beywiki Photo thread - Kai-V - Aug. 13, 2012 If you look at other Beywiki photographs, they must all be taken on a white background ... RE: Beywiki Photo thread - Blader98 - Aug. 13, 2012 (Aug. 13, 2012 4:56 PM)Kai-V Wrote: If you look at other Beywiki photographs, they must all be taken on a white background ... I took pictures on a white background Here they are: http://s1246.photobucket.com/albums/gg610/jvdr98/Big%20Bang%20Pegasis/ If any additional pictures of the bey are needed, just let me know. RE: Beywiki Photo thread - Kai-V - Aug. 14, 2012 They seem very yellow, like you just lightened the first set of pictures. RE: Beywiki Photo thread - Blader98 - Aug. 14, 2012 (Aug. 14, 2012 3:22 AM)Kai-V Wrote: They seem very yellow, like you just lightened the first set of pictures. What should I do so that the pictures are not very yellow? RE: Beywiki Photo thread - sarabscientist - Aug. 14, 2012 Are you using artificial lighting? And as a side note, some of your pictures have something in the back. RE: Beywiki Photo thread - Blader98 - Aug. 14, 2012 (Aug. 14, 2012 3:38 AM)Insomniac Wrote: Are you using artificial lighting? And as a side note, some of your pictures have something in the back. I'm not using artificial lighting, however, I think that I should take the pictures in a better lit room. By the way, about those things in the back, those are some of the beys' parts. RE: Beywiki Photo thread - Blader98 - Aug. 14, 2012 Better pictures of the bey http://s1246.photobucket.com/albums/gg610/jvdr98/Big%20Bang%20Pegasis/ What does everyone think of these pictures? RE: Beywiki Photo thread - sarabscientist - Aug. 14, 2012 Those are definitely better. The other ones looked faded. RE: Beywiki Photo thread - Blader98 - Aug. 14, 2012 (Aug. 14, 2012 4:03 PM)Insomniac Wrote: Those are definitely better. The other ones looked faded. Thank you, now I just need Kai-V's approval to upload these pics to beywiki. RE: Beywiki Photo thread - Kai-V - Aug. 14, 2012 Are you certain that you are using a white surface underneath ... ? RE: Beywiki Photo thread - Blader98 - Aug. 14, 2012 (Aug. 14, 2012 7:28 PM)Kai-V Wrote: Are you certain that you are using a white surface underneath ... ? Yes I am, I am using a sheet of black paper as the white surface. RE: Beywiki Photo thread - Ickle - Aug. 16, 2012 I couldn't find any photo's of Duo Uranus. Spoiler (Click to View) RE: Beywiki Photo thread - th!nk - Aug. 16, 2012 The depth of field is a bit small on a couple of them, mainly the track and the wheel shots, but the lighting and quality looks excellent to me. Helluvalot better than I can do. RE: Beywiki Photo thread - Kai-V - Aug. 16, 2012 Yes, try just having less blur. RE: Beywiki Photo thread - Cannon - Sep. 02, 2012 Had some spare time, so decided to take a few pictures for Plastic Beyblades .. Draciel S: Spoiler (Click to View) Gabriel: (White, Secret Prize) Spoiler (Click to View) Voltaic Ape: Spoiler (Click to View) Dranzer MS Hasbro RC: Spoiler (Click to View) The RC, I just thought that it would be nice to add this to the article, since there are mold variations.. But that's just me. Now, the question is: Are the photos upto BeyWiki's standards/are they usable? If not, it would be nice to give me some advice to improve on. RE: Beywiki Photo thread - Nocto - Sep. 02, 2012 There are a few things I would see improved, but overall, the answer is yes, quite so. The first thing that strikes me is the unnusual sharpness of your pictures, as if you had applied a photoshop "sharpen" filter. The second would be the definition. The relief on Mountain Hammer seems a little shallow, but that could be the AR itself, as I don't own it. Gabriel's edges also somewhat blend in the background slightly. Again, despite the criticism, there are much worse pictures on Beywiki, and yours are quite good. ---------------- Icke, if you ever re-take your pictures, be mindful of your frame, some parts are cropped out of it. Take your pictures a little farther away or zoom out, and it should take care of your framing and depth of field issues. RE: Beywiki Photo thread - Cannon - Sep. 02, 2012 Hmm, these pictures were taken right off the camera; no editing whatsoever. What do you mean as in the "relief" of Mountain Hammer? Aha, look at Seaborg 2s one. hehe. RE: Beywiki Photo thread - Janstarblast - Sep. 02, 2012 By relief, he's referring to the actual structure of Mountain Hammer. That is, the protrusions, grooves, edges, ridges, and all other details of an AR. RE: Beywiki Photo thread - Cannon - Sep. 02, 2012 Cheers Jan! That's just the structure of it, Nocto. EDIT: If it matters, the height of it is approx. 0.9cm. RE: Beywiki Photo thread - Poseidon - Sep. 07, 2012 (Feb. 12, 2012 5:16 PM)Poseidon Wrote: http://imageshack.us/g/833/1000637i.jpg/ Here are some pictures, I thought they were abit better some of them when I took them. Soem of them aren't for the wiki like the wyborg and slash riger, but Im gonna put them on ebay. Hi I think there a few pictures here that can be used, but the timestamp issue is still there- is there a technique that can get rid of it- don't have the picture anymore on my computer still though? RE: Beywiki Photo thread - Kai-V - Sep. 07, 2012 (Sep. 07, 2012 4:51 PM)Poseidon Wrote: Hi I think there a few pictures here that can be used, but the timestamp issue is still there- is there a technique that can get rid of it- don't have the picture anymore on my computer still though? Some are alright, but they are all quite dark and they have a lot of shadow. It would be easy to remove the timestamp in most of them, but lightening them manually would be bad. RE: Beywiki Photo thread - th!nk - Sep. 08, 2012 Not a recolor or even a missing picture, but as I said previously, I'm not happy at all with the current jiraiya MS pictures. Got around to cropping and resizing the other set of Jiraiya MS photos (that were taken indoors, rather than the outdoors ones). They're a bit dark/blue-ish IMO but I couldn't really fix that easily without making a couple (mainly the CWD metal part pics) look inconsistent with the rest, so I'm posting them in case they're fine without editing. Album here: http://s21.photobucket.com/albums/b267/Archdoom/Jiraiya%20MS%20Photos/ The AR underside shot has some dust on it but it was the only one I took at the time, and I couldn't get a good shot of it today at all. Did take a couple of shots I was missing today (whole bey side on/upside down), and the lighting was pretty similar which was nice. I also can't retake the stickerless emblem picture which is a little poorly focussed IMO, seeing as I have the sticker on mine now (and most of the shots can't be redone nicely as I've used my Jiraiya MS a fair bit now). Need to check if I have any of the recolors we're missing, but I don't have many recolors. |