Dragoon Victory Draft - Printable Version +- World Beyblade Organization by Fighting Spirits Inc. (https://worldbeyblade.org) +-- Forum: Beyblade Discussion (https://worldbeyblade.org/Forum-Beyblade-Discussion) +--- Forum: Beyblade Wiki (https://worldbeyblade.org/Forum-Beyblade-Wiki) +--- Thread: Dragoon Victory Draft (/Thread-Dragoon-Victory-Draft) Pages:
1
2
|
RE: Dragoon Victory Draft - Kai-V - Aug. 07, 2014 OK. Does anyone else agree ? RE: Dragoon Victory Draft - Neo - Aug. 07, 2014 (Aug. 07, 2014 4:15 AM)Pyro-Shotty Wrote:(Aug. 07, 2014 4:13 AM)Neo Wrote:I'm no plastics expert but the last time I checked this particular Darcie's ar is severely outclassed, but I wouldn't really know.(Aug. 07, 2014 3:50 AM)Kai-V Wrote: So does everyone think there is nothing wrong about the Dragoon V article then ? Did th!nk never mention what was wrong about it in his opinion ? It's a choice, but Fin Tector is okay. Edit; I think you meant Eight Attacker. It's basically a compact G-Upper, and is very viable IMO. RE: Dragoon Victory Draft - FeedFear - Aug. 07, 2014 (Aug. 07, 2014 4:18 AM)Neo Wrote:Eight attacker is not " very viable" for anything, in comparison that is. Sure you can use it and when, but when it comes to straight numbers other ars do better by leagues(Aug. 07, 2014 4:15 AM)Pyro-Shotty Wrote:(Aug. 07, 2014 4:13 AM)Neo Wrote: I don't think the tip should ever be used in Smash Combos. It's untrustworthy.I'm no plastics expert but the last time I checked this particular Darcie's ar is severely outclassed, but I wouldn't really know. RE: Dragoon Victory Draft - Benjohadi - Aug. 07, 2014 its weird that you addressed dragoon V as both "he" and "it" in the articles..i recommend just stick to one, and "it" would be much more suitable for it is a thing... RE: Dragoon Victory Draft - Neo - Aug. 08, 2014 Fixed, finalized it. Noticed I was wrong about the BB, it REPELS the Stadium. RE: Dragoon Victory Draft - Benjohadi - Aug. 08, 2014 "The Attack ring is directly outclassed by Spike Dragon, but has far less recoil. It is also outclassed by Eight Spiker, because it has good smash and bigger spikes in between the Dragon heads; and is overall more reliable." i dont know if it just me, but i think this sentence is a bot confusing..the way i read the second sentence is that eight attacker is the one that "has good smash and bigger spikes in between the Dragon heads; and is overall more reliable." maybe it is just me, but i prefer for it to sound more like this.. However, this Attack Ring is heavily outclassed by Eight Spiker since Eight Spiker has larger spikes in between the Dragon head, hence, deliver larger amount of smash eventhough suffering for more recoil than Eight Attacker. Eight Spiker overall is a more reliable Attack Ring for smash customization than this Attack Ring. RE: Dragoon Victory Draft - Ultra - Aug. 08, 2014 Uh i'm pretty sure Kai-V agreed that the article doesn't need a rewrite... RE: Dragoon Victory Draft - Benjohadi - Aug. 08, 2014 never mind.. RE: Dragoon Victory Draft - Kai-V - Aug. 08, 2014 Oh, what I mean by rewrite is that people in this topic seem to agree that the original Dragoon V article on Beywiki does not need to be fixed. I have not even read the draft of this thread, but if you all agree that the article on Beywiki is fine as it is, then what I meant is that there is no real point in this topic. RE: Dragoon Victory Draft - Benjohadi - Aug. 08, 2014 oh yea..my mistake..i even forgot that dragoon v has already been published...my mistake...it has been quite long time since i open WBO.. XD RE: Dragoon Victory Draft - Neo - Aug. 08, 2014 (Aug. 08, 2014 4:15 PM)Kai-V Wrote: Oh, what I mean by rewrite is that people in this topic seem to agree that the original Dragoon V article on Beywiki does not need to be fixed. I have not even read the draft of this thread, but if you all agree that the article on Beywiki is fine as it is, then what I meant is that there is no real point in this topic. I don't even really agree anymore. So this can be closed.. |