![]() |
Questions about the WBO - Printable Version +- World Beyblade Organization (https://worldbeyblade.org) +-- Forum: World Beyblade Organization (https://worldbeyblade.org/Forum-World-Beyblade-Organization) +--- Forum: Discuss worldbeyblade.org (https://worldbeyblade.org/Forum-Discuss-worldbeyblade-org) +--- Thread: Questions about the WBO (/Thread-Questions-about-the-WBO) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
|
RE: Questions about the WBO - Nano - Dec. 30, 2011 [Image: facethreadmessedup.jpg] Look at the post number, now look at the pages... Maybe that's your problem, J o n? RE: Questions about the WBO - Kai-V - Dec. 30, 2011 I think the bug of the last page not showing up might have come back, but otherwise things seem good. RE: Questions about the WBO - Nano - Dec. 30, 2011 (Dec. 30, 2011 9:58 PM)Kai-V Wrote: I think the bug of the last page not showing up might have come back, but otherwise things seem good. But it says 1636 posts. If what you said is true, then it would of said 1640 posts. RE: Questions about the WBO - Hazel - Dec. 30, 2011 (Dec. 30, 2011 9:21 PM)GaHooleone Wrote: Well played Hazel. Were you a CTYer? It's a classic at the camp. We were actually not capable of completing the update, apparently, but another attempt will be made later. It's just a software update - on forums, keeping your software updated is the best way to avoid exploits, bugs, etc. RE: Questions about the WBO - Kai-V - Dec. 30, 2011 (Dec. 30, 2011 10:14 PM)Nano Wrote: But it says 1636 posts. If what you said is true, then it would of said 1640 posts. What thread was it ? RE: Questions about the WBO - Nano - Dec. 31, 2011 (Dec. 30, 2011 10:24 PM)Kai-V Wrote:(Dec. 30, 2011 10:14 PM)Nano Wrote: But it says 1636 posts. If what you said is true, then it would of said 1640 posts. Face thread RE: Questions about the WBO - th!nk - Dec. 31, 2011 (Dec. 30, 2011 9:58 PM)Kai-V Wrote: I think the bug of the last page not showing up might have come back, but otherwise things seem good. That bug was already there, albeit for much smaller durations, over the past month or so. RE: Questions about the WBO - Hazel - Dec. 31, 2011 Really? I haven't seen it, or the disappearing post bug, at all. I'd assumed they were resolved... RE: Questions about the WBO - th!nk - Dec. 31, 2011 Something completely identical has occurred to me a number of times in the past month, albeit nowhere near as often as it was when it got really bad. Maybe it's something else, but I've seen the same symptoms, anyway. RE: Questions about the WBO - Hazel - Dec. 31, 2011 Could you describe, in a bit more detail, what you're talking about? And, is anyone else experiencing it? RE: Questions about the WBO - th!nk - Dec. 31, 2011 Not much I can say, to be honest, other than it is identical to the bug where the most recent page doesn't show and you are redirected to the first page, and again it seems either more common on, or limited to, the larger threads. RE: Questions about the WBO - Hazel - Dec. 31, 2011 Hm. Does it require the same "fix"(ie: quoting a post in order to see recent posts), or does re-visiting the page fix it? If it is the latter, I had that happen once earlier today during the restoration. RE: Questions about the WBO - th!nk - Dec. 31, 2011 I haven't actually checked the quoting thing (slipped my mind), but I can say I obtained the pid from the "last post" link in the thread list, and used that to edit one of my posts when I realised after-the-fact I'd made an error. When it happened to me yesterday, my time (i.e. well before the upgrade occurred), reloading, as well as revisiting the page didn't make it show. It's not a common occurrence by any means, it's only happened a few times over the past month or two. RE: Questions about the WBO - Kai-V - Dec. 31, 2011 Has anybody noticed anything wrong since my attempt to upgrade, anything missing, not opening ... ? RE: Questions about the WBO - Hazel - Dec. 31, 2011 I have not noticed anything, outside of the initial stuff. In all of my browsing since then, I've not seen any errors or anything that stood out as hinky. RE: Questions about the WBO - Karl - Dec. 31, 2011 *sigh* you look at the first comments of this thread when the WBO was fresh. Now, the WBO is so dang big and supperior! *sniffle* websites, they grow so fast! Anyway! i'm having trouble with the search function! every time i type in the specific name of the thread it says, "no matches found" or something like that! a little help please? RE: Questions about the WBO - Imperial - Dec. 31, 2011 Are you sure you are pressing the "Search Titles Only" bubble below the search box? RE: Questions about the WBO - Karl - Dec. 31, 2011 i tried that and it still won't work! i'm trying to get to that thread talking about banning basalt. RE: Questions about the WBO - Kai-V - Dec. 31, 2011 What are you searching ... There is basic logic involved in searches ... You will get more results if you search "ban" than if you search "banning", that is obvious ... RE: Questions about the WBO - Imperial - Dec. 31, 2011 (Dec. 31, 2011 4:40 AM)Karl Wrote: i tried that and it still won't work! i'm trying to get to that thread talking about banning basalt. Well, if you typed in exactly "Banning Basalt" it probably wouldn't work. The thread is called "Should we Ban Basalt". So the phrase typed in aren't keywords of the title. RE: Questions about the WBO - Arupaeo - Dec. 31, 2011 Search In the upper left hand corner type in "ban basalt" Below where you just typed are two radio buttons, make sure the black dot is in the lower button: search titles only Then press search at the bottom of the page RE: Questions about the WBO - Karl - Dec. 31, 2011 it's working now! :3 wow! a lot of people answering my question! like my momma says: "great minds think alike!" RE: Questions about the WBO - Justaway - Dec. 31, 2011 (Dec. 31, 2011 4:06 AM)Kai-V Wrote: Has anybody noticed anything wrong since my attempt to upgrade, anything missing, not opening ... ? Most of the times The links for the 'last post' in 'Latest Threads'(highlighted in the pic in Spoiler) do not work for me. Whenever I click on last post, it just takes me to the top. Thats the only problem I found. Otherwise the thread and the username's links work well. Spoiler (Click to View) RE: Questions about the WBO - Kai-V - Dec. 31, 2011 Oh, that "Last Post" link never worked hah. It has been like that since the beginning of Beywiki, from what I can remember. RE: Questions about the WBO - Justaway - Dec. 31, 2011 And it was not too significant as well so I didnt bother to see if it worked before. |