World Beyblade Organization by Fighting Spirits Inc.
Battle Strikers Discussion - Printable Version

+- World Beyblade Organization by Fighting Spirits Inc. (https://worldbeyblade.org)
+-- Forum: Other (https://worldbeyblade.org/Forum-Other)
+--- Forum: Closed Threads (https://worldbeyblade.org/Forum-Closed-Threads)
+--- Thread: Battle Strikers Discussion (/Thread-Battle-Strikers-Discussion)



RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - beybladeheart - Dec. 08, 2009

battle strikers to me are better


RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - Dirge - Dec. 09, 2009

(Dec. 08, 2009  11:21 PM)beybladeheart Wrote: battle strikers to me are better

id have to agree from what ive heard about the xs,battle strikers are alot better then beyblades atm,and theyve evoled the game of battleing tops in some very good ways (Y) keep up the good work


RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - TheLVJ - Dec. 09, 2009

Will the redesigned Xs stadium be sold separately or exclusively along with the future Tournament Set?


RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - Minion - Dec. 09, 2009

Just FYI, plastic strikers are on sale at walmart (in Toronto) for $4.95CDN, stadiums are $10CDN, and starters are $19.95CDN. I realize that come next month, the plastic series will be mostly obsolete, but if you don't have a stadium, now might be the time to get one.


RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - Bey Brad - Dec. 09, 2009

(Dec. 09, 2009  12:19 AM)The LVJ Wrote: Will the redesigned Xs stadium be sold separately or exclusively along with the future Tournament Set?

It will be sold separately as well.


RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - beybladeheart - Dec. 09, 2009

about the metal xs are they just going to be the metal version of the battle strikers series 1


RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - Bey Brad - Dec. 09, 2009

(Dec. 09, 2009  2:47 AM)beybladeheart Wrote: about the metal xs are they just going to be the metal version of the battle strikers series 1

As I already wrote, it's a new system.


RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - PengiunXS - Dec. 09, 2009

So is Metal XS gonna for sure be released in January like is there any possibilities of there being a delay?


RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - Bey Brad - Dec. 09, 2009

(Dec. 09, 2009  3:43 AM)PengiunXS Wrote: So is Metal XS gonna for sure be released in January like is there any possibilities of there being a delay?

We wouldn't have announced it if we weren't sure.


RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - beybladeheart - Dec. 09, 2009

Oh sorry didnt see that
(Dec. 09, 2009  2:52 AM)Bey Brad Wrote: As I already wrote, it's a new system.



RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - PengiunXS - Dec. 09, 2009

(Dec. 09, 2009  3:52 AM)Bey Brad Wrote: We wouldn't have announced it if we weren't sure.

well good to know you guys stick toyour word


RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - VoodooScarecrow - Dec. 09, 2009

the Metal XS sound awsome but will they be able to fight equally with MFB cause the first Battle strikers didnt stand much of a chance against beyblade unless they had the metal ball then it could compete with plastics cause i would like to battle the Metal XS against MFB if they can go against each other equally


RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - Serotonin - Dec. 09, 2009

(Dec. 05, 2009  11:00 PM)Bey Brad Wrote: As I said, the power level is about on par with MFB, with some of them being stronger than MFB. They are about the size of the old plastic Beyblades.

Also, why should the sole focus of Metal XS, and Battle Strikers be to be able to "beat" MFB? They're different games ...


RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - VoodooScarecrow - Dec. 09, 2009

Thanks for pointing that outStupid

i think it would be awsome fun having them compete cause i think the general simple of idea of sinning tops battling is great fun and the more this can be expanded on the betterStupid


RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - beybladeheart - Dec. 09, 2009

Hey brad could you post some pictures of some of the metal xs and the stadium to see what it looks like?


RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - JC065 - Dec. 09, 2009

I'd be interested in seeing pictures of the strikers broken down, so we can see how they go together and their customisation potential. However I don't think he'll be able to just yet.


RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - FlamingAura - Dec. 09, 2009

(Dec. 08, 2009  9:33 PM)Bey Brad Wrote: They have used Metal XS. You have not ... so, I think these longtime players are more qualified to talk about it.

Ok lets see which the public will choose...


RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - AnnieDuck - Dec. 09, 2009

They are the public. Neither of them work for Mega, Kai-V has been around the Bey community as long as (if not longer) than I have, and Val is the most promising newer player I've seen for years.

If they say Metal XS is better, it's better.


RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - JC065 - Dec. 09, 2009

Quote:If they say Metal XS is better, it's better in their opinion
I'm sorry, I just needed to correct your previous statement. Mainly because I think people are starting to lose sight of the main point. There is no better game, it's all down to personal preference. Both games, although using the same spinning top concept, have different methods of play and call upon different skills.

Beyblade as we've said before is all about combining parts and finding the best possible combination, Battle Strikers is less about customisation and more about your skill at being able to control your striker. They're both different games and to compare them is such a simplistic was as to say "which one is better?" is doing both games a disservice, because you're ignoring the fact that each game has its own merits and flaws, and it will be down to peoples individual choice as to which one is for them.


RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - beybladeheart - Dec. 09, 2009

(Dec. 09, 2009  9:07 PM)JC065 Wrote: I'd be interested in seeing pictures of the strikers broken down, so we can see how they go together and their customisation potential. However I don't think he'll be able to just yet.

yeah I agree about the broken down part ,but isnt your picture a metal xs.


RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - Bey Brad - Dec. 09, 2009

(Dec. 09, 2009  10:02 PM)JC065 Wrote: I'm sorry, I just needed to correct your previous statement. Mainly because I think people are starting to lose sight of the main point. There is no better game, it's all down to personal preference. Both games, although using the same spinning top concept, have different methods of play and call upon different skills.

Except Battle Strikers has as much customization as MFB. Wink


RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - JC065 - Dec. 10, 2009

Quote:You are going to see a huge change in this come January. If the skill level (actual skill, not "knowledge") in Beyblade is like 20%, I'd say in Battle Strikers it's at least 60%. There is a lot more focus on the player's ability here than just the Striker. So, of course the player with the proper/best Striker is at a significant advantage, but an aggressive player with a "weaker" Striker but more skill at control and aiming can come out on top.

I was just going by what you yourself had said. Maybe I'd put my point forward the wrong way, I was trying to say that the emphasis is on different aspects of the game mechanics. You've even said yourself that in Battle Strikers the combination of parts affects the outcome less, whereas in Beyblade it's an important part of the game.


RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - Bey Brad - Dec. 10, 2009

I said more focus on the player's ability than just the Striker. Customizing your Striker effectively to match your play style is still very important. It's just not the only important factor.


RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - Dirge - Dec. 10, 2009

haha picked up skulltor and the wolf one today 5$ each for a booster couldnt help but buy them xD


RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - Minion - Dec. 10, 2009

(Dec. 09, 2009  10:02 PM)beybladeheart Wrote: yeah I agree about the broken down part ,but isnt your picture a metal xs.

Which you can clearly find, as a teaser image on their public website. http://battlestrikers.com/newsletter.php