(Dec. 30, 2010  4:29 AM)tman14 Wrote:

(Dec. 30, 2010  4:10 AM)The Fire Wyrm Wrote:

(Dec. 30, 2010  3:52 AM)tman14 Wrote:

(Dec. 30, 2010  3:47 AM)The Fire Wyrm Wrote: Epic Fail XDDDDD

what?

Its ROFL......

elaborate? I always thought I knew what it meant but not exactly what it meant XD

EDIT: ok I changed it to LOL so whatever

(Dec. 31, 2010  1:02 AM)Jacksonian Wrote: My new video is the unboxing of Gravity Perseus http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Av52sfUhhvc

(Dec. 31, 2010  1:09 AM)Blaze Wheeler Wrote:

(Dec. 31, 2010  1:02 AM)Jacksonian Wrote: My new video is the unboxing of Gravity Perseus http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Av52sfUhhvc

LOL.... That was hilarious.

(Dec. 31, 2010  10:07 AM)Diamond Wrote:

A bunch of terribly narrated unboxing videos by Diamond on the Beyblade Super Deck: (Click to View)

Part 1
Part 2
Part 3

Yours sincerely,
Noseyplonk

(Dec. 31, 2010  10:26 AM)OkiBlaze Wrote: Thanks for the videos, Noseyplonk, but I just have one question: Why did you knife him?

(Dec. 31, 2010  10:32 AM)Diamond Wrote:

(Dec. 31, 2010  10:26 AM)OkiBlaze Wrote: Thanks for the videos, Noseyplonk, but I just have one question: Why did you knife him?

No particular reason, I just enjoy sneaking into a stranger's bedroom in the dead of night and knife him or her.

-Noseyplonk

(Dec. 31, 2010  5:15 PM)Bluezee Wrote: I still think that combo isnt defense though. It should be attack.

(Dec. 31, 2010  5:17 PM)Diamond Wrote:

(Dec. 31, 2010  5:15 PM)Bluezee Wrote: I still think that combo isnt defense though. It should be attack.

CS, GB145 and MF-H are all Top-Tier Defense parts.
Libra was also a Top-Tier Defense Wheel before it was banned.

I really can't see how it could be Attack?

(Dec. 31, 2010  5:28 PM)Bluezee Wrote: CS. That is my main issue. It is clearly an attack bottom that is used for defense. If you put a RF on a combo with GB145 and MF-H and something like Libra, does that now make RF a defense part now? If that's the case, the metagame doesnt make sense. Are you getting what I'm saying? I could explain it better.

(Dec. 31, 2010  5:32 PM)OkiBlaze Wrote:

(Dec. 31, 2010  5:28 PM)Bluezee Wrote: CS. That is my main issue. It is clearly an attack bottom that is used for defense. If you put a RF on a combo with GB145 and MF-H and something like Libra, does that now make RF a defense part now? If that's the case, the metagame doesnt make sense. Are you getting what I'm saying? I could explain it better.

CS and RF are totally different. Just because they both have rubber doesn't mean that you can compare them.

CS was never intended to be a strict attack bottom. The way it is mostly utilized now, because of its lack of attack in most cases, is to use the rubber for defensive purposes.

(Dec. 31, 2010  5:37 PM)Bluezee Wrote:

(Dec. 31, 2010  5:32 PM)OkiBlaze Wrote:

(Dec. 31, 2010  5:28 PM)Bluezee Wrote: CS. That is my main issue. It is clearly an attack bottom that is used for defense. If you put a RF on a combo with GB145 and MF-H and something like Libra, does that now make RF a defense part now? If that's the case, the metagame doesnt make sense. Are you getting what I'm saying? I could explain it better.

CS and RF are totally different. Just because they both have rubber doesn't mean that you can compare them.

CS was never intended to be a strict attack bottom. The way it is mostly utilized now, because of its lack of attack in most cases, is to use the rubber for defensive purposes.

How are you so sure that it wasn't meant for attack? I mean, I see your logic seeing as how it could be used for stamina and attack, which was its intended purpose, but aren't beyblade types determined by their bottoms? I mean, people use RSF for defense but isn't it really supposed to be a balance combo? I wish there was a better way for me to show you what I mean.

Actually, a perfect example I can think of is Libra CH120RF. Labeled as balance but it is really an attack combo. Making any sense now?

(Dec. 31, 2010  5:44 PM)OkiBlaze Wrote:

(Dec. 31, 2010  5:37 PM)Bluezee Wrote:

(Dec. 31, 2010  5:32 PM)OkiBlaze Wrote:

(Dec. 31, 2010  5:28 PM)Bluezee Wrote: CS. That is my main issue. It is clearly an attack bottom that is used for defense. If you put a RF on a combo with GB145 and MF-H and something like Libra, does that now make RF a defense part now? If that's the case, the metagame doesnt make sense. Are you getting what I'm saying? I could explain it better.

CS and RF are totally different. Just because they both have rubber doesn't mean that you can compare them.

CS was never intended to be a strict attack bottom. The way it is mostly utilized now, because of its lack of attack in most cases, is to use the rubber for defensive purposes.

How are you so sure that it wasn't meant for attack? I mean, I see your logic seeing as how it could be used for stamina and attack, which was its intended purpose, but aren't beyblade types determined by their bottoms? I mean, people use RSF for defense but isn't it really supposed to be a balance combo? I wish there was a better way for me to show you what I mean.

Actually, a perfect example I can think of is Libra CH120RF. Labeled as balance but it is really an attack combo. Making any sense now?

Note the word "Sharp" in "Coat Sharp." Sharp series bottoms don't really give a lot of attack.

Beys are never determined by one part alone. As a whole bey, the parts benefit in its performance and in each category in one way or another. MF Lightning LDrago 100CS isn't necessarily a defense type. Bottoms are an important part to a bey, yes, but it's the whole bey that creates the final verdict.

As to Libra CH120RF, they bey is designed to outspin regular attack combos and knock out stamina and defense types, making it a somewhat "Balance" type. Again, Libra provided the stamina, and CH120RF provided the attack. It's not all in one part.