![]() |
Errors on the wiki ??? - Printable Version +- World Beyblade Organization (https://worldbeyblade.org) +-- Forum: Beyblade Discussion (https://worldbeyblade.org/Forum-Beyblade-Discussion) +--- Forum: Beyblade Wiki (https://worldbeyblade.org/Forum-Beyblade-Wiki) +--- Thread: Errors on the wiki ??? (/Thread-Errors-on-the-wiki) |
RE: Errors on the wiki ??? - BEYoncé - Dec. 15, 2010 uhhh all the upcoming releases on the main page have been out for a while now someone should update that real quick RE: Errors on the wiki ??? - swenypeter - Dec. 16, 2010 I dont know if it wa just me but i could not find an article for rock girrafe r145wb RE: Errors on the wiki ??? - blah - Dec. 16, 2010 That's because it hasn't been officially published onto Beywiki yet. There are still a lot of Beyblade articles which have not been published, mainly due to the fact that they have not met Beywiki standards yet. RE: Errors on the wiki ??? - Night - Dec. 16, 2010 Killer Gemios' page (in the summary) says DF125, when it's DF145. EDIT: I've fixed it, though... RE: Errors on the wiki ??? - Chaos Blader - Dec. 21, 2010 Lol. RE: Errors on the wiki ??? - s-pegasus - Dec. 24, 2010 The WB section for Rock Leone's Article needs to be updated since WB is no longer top-tier http://wiki.worldbeyblade.org/index.php?title=Rock_Leone_145WB EDIT: the overall section needs to be updated to. RE: Errors on the wiki ??? - Priscient - Dec. 25, 2010 Would it be safe to say Rock Leone 145WB is outclassed, and should only be used for collection purposes? RE: Errors on the wiki ??? - Ray Joker - Dec. 25, 2010 Pretty much. Rock is outclassed, lower tracks beat 145 in Stamina, and WB is outclassed too. RE: Errors on the wiki ??? - Priscient - Dec. 25, 2010 And, in the Libra Article, should it still be listed as "Every blader should own multiples of this Beyblade"? As it's still banned, even though there is discussion about un-banning it. RE: Errors on the wiki ??? - Ray Joker - Dec. 25, 2010 I always thought it said that because it was very versatile and rare. If you had multiples, you had Stamina, Defense, and Attack beys all-in-one with the same beyblade. RE: Errors on the wiki ??? - s-pegasus - Dec. 25, 2010 (Dec. 25, 2010 12:20 AM)Pockyx3 Wrote: And, in the Libra Article, should it still be listed as "Every blader should own multiples of this Beyblade"?Ow yeah! Libra's Awesome!I'm kidding. I don't think so. It doesn't have things like rubber that wear out. EDIT: Rayjoker Libra's stamina sucks RE: Errors on the wiki ??? - Daegor42 - Dec. 25, 2010 (Dec. 25, 2010 12:23 AM)s-pegasus Wrote: Ow yeah! Libra's Awesome!I'm kidding. I don't think so. It doesn't have things like rubber that wear out. I'm pretty sure Libra has some breakage issues. RE: Errors on the wiki ??? - Priscient - Dec. 25, 2010 (Dec. 25, 2010 12:22 AM)Ray Joker Wrote: I always thought it said that because it was very versatile and rare. If you had multiples, you had Stamina, Defense, and Attack beys all-in-one with the same beyblade. Yes, however as it stands right now, it could only be effectively used for testing purposes, which means it's useless in a competitive situation; which of course is what Beywiki is supposed to comprised of. And, rarity shouldn't speak for how many of the same beys you should have. I'd say that we keep it down to one copy per blader, at the most. RE: Errors on the wiki ??? - Ray Joker - Dec. 25, 2010 If you read Beywiki, it had exceptional Stamina too because the weight of Libra is distributed on the outside. It even says Libra was a top-tier Stamina bey. (Unless it's been outdated. I came after Libra was banned.) RE: Errors on the wiki ??? - Priscient - Dec. 25, 2010 Libra's stamina doesn't "suck", but it's definitely outclassed now by burn. RE: Errors on the wiki ??? - Daegor42 - Dec. 25, 2010 (Dec. 25, 2010 12:26 AM)Ray Joker Wrote: If you read Beywiki, it had exceptional Stamina too because the weight of Libra is distributed on the outside. It also used to say Pegasis is great for Defense. A lot of Beywiki articles are outdated now. RE: Errors on the wiki ??? - Priscient - Dec. 25, 2010 So, shall it be brought down to one, or zero? RE: Errors on the wiki ??? - Ray Joker - Dec. 25, 2010 Wow, unexpected. Thanks Daegor42 + Pockyx3, I wasn't particularly aware of how it would stack up against the new Stamina customizations. RE: Errors on the wiki ??? - s-pegasus - Dec. 25, 2010 (Dec. 25, 2010 12:26 AM)Daegor42 Wrote:(Dec. 25, 2010 12:23 AM)s-pegasus Wrote: Ow yeah! Libra's Awesome!I'm kidding. I don't think so. It doesn't have things like rubber that wear out. I'm sure Earth has breakage problems too but beywiki doesn't say you have to have multiples. RE: Errors on the wiki ??? - Priscient - Dec. 25, 2010 I fixed it, and changed it to one. RE: Errors on the wiki ??? - MaskedPhoenix - Dec. 27, 2010 could somebody edit the article on the Balance beyblade Type so that it mentions that they're also known as Combination Types? It only seems appropriate since the Stamina Type article also mentions its Endurance name, and could somebody put down that hasbro beyblade products refer to Winders and Shooters as Launchers and Ripcords? RE: Errors on the wiki ??? - Mc Frown - Dec. 27, 2010 I don't think those are great additions. RE: Errors on the wiki ??? - LeonTempest - Dec. 27, 2010 doesnt matter. a wiki must posses all information about its topic, even if that portion of it sucks horribly. HOWEVER, right now, those items are not a priority. Currently, beywiki's main priorities are getting up all information on Pre-HWS and HWS as possible, and then posting the missing HMS and plastic bey articles. Misc gear is very far down on the list and will probobly not go up for a very long time. sorry, just being realistic RE: Errors on the wiki ??? - Mc Frown - Dec. 28, 2010 Colloquial terms aren't exactly content. Besides, we're keeping out ridiculous factory knowledge/terminology. We don't show Takara Tomy/SonoKong/Hasbro's ludicrous star rating system, now do we? Mostly it's a competitive wiki, not a hobby/enthusiast wiki. RE: Errors on the wiki ??? - Ga' - Jan. 01, 2011 The draciel f pics don't work for me... maybe that's just me, but still. |