Oct. 28, 2019 1:50 PM
Oct. 28, 2019 2:06 PM
(Oct. 28, 2019 1:50 PM)Emperor 1 Wrote: [ -> ]SO I HAVE SEEN ALOT OF BEYTUBERS MOCKING ROKTAVOR AND I WANT TO KNOW WHY?
Which one?
Oct. 28, 2019 2:11 PM
SLINGSHOCK ROKTAVORS
Oct. 28, 2019 2:14 PM
(Oct. 28, 2019 2:11 PM)Emperor 1 Wrote: [ -> ]SLINGSHOCK ROKTAVORS
Because it loses to nearly any decent combo
Oct. 28, 2019 2:16 PM
you could be right, but they should have put metal at the bottom.
Oct. 28, 2019 3:47 PM
SS Roktavor R4 has a slingshock driver of wedge that more works like a balance type driver than a stamina type.
That's why SS Roktavor R4 is bad
That's why SS Roktavor R4 is bad
Oct. 28, 2019 4:29 PM
It has also lost most of it's weight on the top half too, and it was never a good stamina type to begin with.
Oct. 28, 2019 4:44 PM
(Oct. 28, 2019 2:11 PM)Emperor 1 Wrote: [ -> ]SLINGSHOCK ROKTAVORS
Because it's awful, that's why.
(Oct. 28, 2019 4:29 PM)Suzaku-X Wrote: [ -> ]It has also lost most of it's weight on the top half too, and it was never a good stamina type to begin with.The TT one was actually really good at one point.
Oct. 28, 2019 9:12 PM
(Oct. 28, 2019 4:44 PM)bladekid Wrote: [ -> ](Oct. 28, 2019 2:11 PM)Emperor 1 Wrote: [ -> ]SLINGSHOCK ROKTAVORS
Because it's awful, that's why.
(Oct. 28, 2019 4:29 PM)Suzaku-X Wrote: [ -> ]It has also lost most of it's weight on the top half too, and it was never a good stamina type to begin with.The TT one was actually really good at one point.
Yeah but I remember it being used as an attack layer. Even with that the Hasbro one lost most of it's attack power anyways.