(In Looks) MFB(BMF) owns Battle Striker
(Spin) Beyblade Faster Revs
(clashing)Beyblade nothing like Metal Clashing
(control)To be truthful Battle Strikers
But you making it move lowers its speed(i think) But Beyblade you got launching ticknecks(sorry for spelling) Personaly Beyblade someone get a youtube vid to see whats the Best
ticknecks........techniques?
You cannot compare them by a video, they are different games. They may both be spinning top based but they work and are designed differently. As for looks, whilst I do indeed prefer beyblade, but looks are purely subjective and I know people who prefer battle strikers instead.
i actually think the strikers look really cool and to a younger audience are probably going to be more appealing than the more minimalist MFB
i remember when MFB launched there were a lot of complaints they were boring looking
ok but we do need to get more people to know about beyblade (but we well see if Battle Strikers last and ya I can't compare them in a video)
why is this in the questions and comments forum anyway, moving to general
also there's no reason these two lines can't exist alongside each other, not to mention battle strikers is out now and MFB doesn't launch over here for over a year
(Jul. 25, 2009 11:41 PM)Bey Brad Wrote: [ -> ]i actually think the strikers look really cool and to a younger audience are probably going to be more appealing than the more minimalist MFB
Yes, battle strikers are geared to a slightly younger audience then Beyblades. Beyblades aren't big and flashy and colorful like battle strikers, so they dont catch the eye of a young kid at a toy store like Battle Strikers.
How long to battle strikers spin? Because I liek beyblades if they spin longer...and if they dont...I still like beyblades...
Then you don't really nead an answer, do you?
Beyblades spin longer, usually. Though plastics don't by too much. My Battle Strikers spin around 0:45-1:15 long. Plastics spin closer to 2:00 and some over.
(Jul. 25, 2009 11:41 PM)Bey Brad Wrote: [ -> ]i remember when MFB launched there were a lot of complaints they were boring looking
If anyone was specific about a blade, and it was sagittario, i might blow up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A nice thing to try would be a bey vs. a striker. I understand that they are two completely diffrent hobbies (well, bs might be a toy, but bb is a hobby) some people may be curous to which would be more powerful. I have my bets on mfb, but i've never actually seen a battle striker. My friends tell me rediculous stuff they saw in comercials, like:
Quote:If your battle striker dies, you can poke it with your launcher to revive it. The battles last forever!
I personally doubt that, but again, i have never seen one.
what the magikarap are battle striker like gundams something sacrifice rock...no really they like battle bd man thoise pretty cool but battle strikers sounds like new cheezy version good old morphing rangers
saw it battle striiikers you tube look walking poffin pokemon on crack with pillow armor more like 321 i declare rc thumb war on spideys girl _mary duh
What in the world about battle strikers can even remotely remind you of the mighty morphin power rangers
(Aug. 04, 2009 1:07 AM)phnx3.14vrhmm Wrote: [ -> ]what the magikarap are battle striker like gundams something sacrifice rock...no really they like battle bd man thoise pretty cool but battle strikers sounds like new cheezy version good old morphing rangers
saw it battle striiikers you tube look walking poffin pokemon on crack with pillow armor more like 321 i declare rc thumb war on spideys girl _mary duh
Punctuation is your friend, also google.
yeah mfb's imo dont look as cool as the orginal beyblade but they still look cooler then battle strikers they just look so stupid kinda reminds me of those battle spin warriors that came out around the same time as beyblades(well they did here) but as soon as the anime came out everyone got beyblades animes tend to sell products well just see how english countrys respond to it
. Just because you prefer beys doesn`t mean you should not give strikers a chance.
Imo, they are designed quite well. The only flaw that I really don`t like is their low spin time, and the gimmick of making them spin longer not working.
i dont know if anyone eles is thinking this but it seems all it realy has to offer is control which you can get with beyblade like the MG core you can control the pattens and the RC beyblades
(Aug. 04, 2009 4:17 PM)heero yuy Wrote: [ -> ]i dont know if anyone eles is thinking this but it seems all it realy has to offer is control which you can get with beyblade like the MG core you can control the pattens and the RC beyblades
... uh not really
The magnets aren't strong enough in MG blades to control the blade from the top. They're also too heavy to really control.
Radio controlled tops are controlled in a completely different manner and you honestly don't have that much control over where they go.
I think battle strikers have a pretty cool innovation going
I like beyblade way better, someone go make a beyblade vs battle striker vid for the lulz of it. Do all the MFBs against all the battle strikers its about 11 v 11 or something.
I wish this thread was closed. Battle Strikers and Beyblades are pretty different. Don't see why we have to compare them.
I will close it, actually.
They're entirely different gameplay. You may as well play Checkers Vs. Chess pieces.