I believe the photos should wait, as it might take a while to compose them all.
As for the recolor deal, maybe we should just leave em out, it would over complicate the list and have stuff listed twice.
(Jun. 13, 2012 3:09 AM)Raigeko13 Wrote: [ -> ]As for the recolor deal, maybe we should just leave em out, it would over complicate the list and have stuff listed twice.
That's a good point, it's probably better to keep it more simple.
Also, I was thinking about leaving the description out for the stadiums, so it looks less cluttered.
Yeah, maybe in due time when they can all have complete descriptions, but for now I think we should scratch them.
Yo, just look at how simple the MFB Product List is, and reproduce it with Hasbro's releases. It is not complicated, hah.
So, I guess I'll should take out the descriptions for the special sets and blader gear as well?
Yes, those should just all have individual articles.
Don't delete them entirely, though. Spoiler them in the OP or somewhere, as they're still a useful reference until those sets have articles.
Looks good for now! Great job on the article, couldn't have done it any better myself.
So if something new Hasbro releases needs to be added to the list, should it be posted and approved here first?
(Jun. 16, 2012 4:54 AM)Imperial Wrote: [ -> ]So if something new Hasbro releases needs to be added to the list, should it be posted and approved here first?
No, I would like you to add it directly on Beywiki, hah. Unless it is something very different and that we need to consider either another article, another section, etc.
Some new stuff:
W-02 Doom Fire Drago
W-03 Slash Warrior Destroyer
W-04 Raging Molten Fireblaze
W-05 Wild Mane Leone
W-06 Rampage Stomper Bull
W-07 Shadow Fortune Zurafa
Haha those names are so funny... I'll add them.
Prepare to face the wrath of my DOOM FIRE DRAGO!
Hurr Durr
Just a question, should the Metal Fury Beyblades link to their 4D counterparts? I am assuming no, but I just want to know what everyone thinks.
IMO, no, some have entirely different parts, and the Metal Wheels definitely aren't the same. For the most part, they're their own bey.
There will be separate articles, yes.
Should Beywheelz sets have a subsection under "Special Sets" so people don't get confused? I think it is a good idea.
EDIT: Since no one objected, I changed it.
So I wanted to get some insight on the format for Metal Fury, because of the Hyperblade Series coming out.
First of all, how is this layout?
Quote:===Metal Fury===
====Primary Releases====
.......
====Hyperblade Series====
.....
*Should the Hyperblades link to the Takara-Tomy articles?
*Should there be some indication on the page that the two Cosmic etc. Metal Wheels differ?
Yes and yes, in my opinion.
So the format is good?
I'm not really sure how to make the indication... Maybe put Big Bang in parenthesees for one? Or add a note on the top of the Hyperblade section stating that these are the true models of the 4D system.
Perhaps write the actual product name, but do not link it to anywhere. For the link, put parentheses right after the product name introducing Big Bang Pegasis F
, and [[ ]] that.
So, like Cosmic Pegasus F:D ([[Big Bang Pegasis F:D]])?
OK, I think that will work fine.
Yes, exactly like that.
It is quite stupid of Hasbro to give the same name to two entirely different parts ...