May. 03, 2011 9:02 PM
Pages: 1 2
May. 04, 2011 10:11 AM
ok so it tested this
equipment
sliding shot was used
Basalt fury vs libra bd145rs
BF wins 0
Libra wins 10 1 ko 9 os
Basalt fury vs libra 85 d
BF wins 5 all ko
Libra wins 5 all os
if i MF'ed libra it would have preformed way better i tested MF L vs MF -M aswell so dont say i have no proof
this combo isn't good IMO there are heaps better combos out there ....
equipment
Spoiler (Click to View)
tt attack stadium beylauncher + 3 seg launcher grip
Basalt fury vs libra bd145rs
BF wins 0
Libra wins 10 1 ko 9 os
Basalt fury vs libra 85 d
BF wins 5 all ko
Libra wins 5 all os
if i MF'ed libra it would have preformed way better i tested MF L vs MF -M aswell so dont say i have no proof
this combo isn't good IMO there are heaps better combos out there ....
May. 04, 2011 7:19 PM
(May. 04, 2011 10:11 AM)RustyXD Wrote: [ -> ]ok so it tested thisyh if u have read postes before this you would have seen that this is just for people who are currious about the combo and more testing is needed to be done also i used parts that people are more likely to have, just cheers up okay .
equipmentsliding shot was usedSpoiler (Click to View)tt attack stadium beylauncher + 3 seg launcher grip
Basalt fury vs libra bd145rs
BF wins 0
Libra wins 10 1 ko 9 os
Basalt fury vs libra 85 d
BF wins 5 all ko
Libra wins 5 all os
if i MF'ed libra it would have preformed way better i tested MF L vs MF -M aswell so dont say i have no proof
this combo isn't good IMO there are heaps better combos out there ....
May. 04, 2011 10:27 PM
Cheer up? How are we supposed to do that. People like us can't cheer up. Why is more testing needed to be done. This combo isn't that good, so no more testing is needed. And I noticed no testing against Basalt, so that's wierd.
May. 04, 2011 10:38 PM
yeah cause i don't have 2 basalts so i used Libra since its the second best and it did great against it
May. 06, 2011 4:47 PM
well im not going to bother to say anything because i dont want to repeat my self again
May. 06, 2011 10:48 PM
(May. 06, 2011 4:47 PM)taz465 Wrote: [ -> ]well im not going to bother to say anything because i dont want to repeat my self again
Alright. You want more testing done. Why don't you do it yourself?
Pages: 1 2