I heard that some driver have their srping tighter then other so may be it could help if its true.
(Jun. 01, 2017 4:54 PM)loyd87 Wrote: [ -> ]I heard that some driver have their srping tighter then other so may be it could help if its true.
so far the only drivers i heard that have strong springs are accel , zephyr , edge,survive and defense.
(Jun. 01, 2017 4:54 PM)Uloyd87 Wrote: [ -> ]I heard that some driver have their srping tighter then other so may be it could help if its true.
(Jun. 01, 2017 4:58 PM)Rebel Blader Wrote: [ -> ] (Jun. 01, 2017 4:54 PM)loyd87 Wrote: [ -> ]I heard that some driver have their srping tighter then other so may be it could help if its true.
so far the only drivers i heard that have strong springs are accel , zephyr , edge,survive and defense.
I don't think it's true it's more about the slopes on the layers
(Jun. 02, 2017 4:08 AM)SUGOI-KONICHEWA Wrote: [ -> ] (Jun. 01, 2017 4:54 PM)Uloyd87 Wrote: [ -> ]I heard that some driver have their srping tighter then other so may be it could help if its true.
(Jun. 01, 2017 4:58 PM)Rebel Blader Wrote: [ -> ]so far the only drivers i heard that have strong springs are accel , zephyr , edge,survive and defense.
I don't think it's true it's more about the slopes on the layers
its true from what i have on YT hasbro revolve bursts more easily than any other drivers.
Actually sping compression if mostly a manufacturing varience. Since each part can't be completely identical, there are bound to be some varience. Some of the driver's springs don't compress tightly and lead to weaker slope/teeth.
(Jun. 02, 2017 5:01 AM)Mage Wrote: [ -> ]Actually sping compression if mostly a manufacturing varience. Since each part can't be completely identical, there are bound to be some varience. Some of the driver's springs don't compress tightly and lead to weaker slope/teeth.
so basically some hasbro drivers feel more tight than some others
(Jun. 02, 2017 4:44 AM)Rebel Blader Wrote: [ -> ] (Jun. 02, 2017 4:08 AM)SUGOI-KONICHEWA Wrote: [ -> ]I don't think it's true it's more about the slopes on the layers
its true from what i have on YT hasbro revolve bursts more easily than any other drivers.
This is getting off topic guys. But tbh, we shouldn't really decide about performance sololy based on YouTube videos. As they might be edited and chances are more popular bey is made to win or outcome is due to only best photoage was taken out of many battles. I'm not saying all youtuber does this btw.
(Jun. 02, 2017 1:02 PM)FIREFIRE CPB Wrote: [ -> ] (Jun. 02, 2017 4:44 AM)Rebel Blader Wrote: [ -> ]its true from what i have on YT hasbro revolve bursts more easily than any other drivers.
This is getting off topic guys. But tbh, we shouldn't really decide about performance sololy based on YouTube videos. As they might be edited and chances are more popular bey is made to win or outcome is due to only best photoage was taken out of many battles. I'm not saying all youtuber does this btw.
yea i think we should discuss about it in the hasbro testing thread anyways not only yt i have also heard alot of people say hasbro revolve is bad.
just to put that ended I owned 2 hasbro revolve and they are good I didn't notice much more burst from them. back on winning combinations!
(Jun. 02, 2017 1:28 PM)loyd87 Wrote: [ -> ]just to put that ended I owned 2 hasbro revolve and they are good I didn't notice much more burst from them. back on winning combinations!
yea i wanted to ask i saw z2 on a winning combo is it good?
its supposed to be usefull in attack combination. I heard too having some breakage issue. I don't know if Takara have reinforced it by time or not.
(Jun. 02, 2017 1:37 PM)loyd87 Wrote: [ -> ]its supposed to be usefull in attack combination. I heard too having some breakage issue. I don't know if Takara have reinforced it by time or not.
it has bad teeth how can something with bad teeth be good for attack.
Z2's self recoil isint that huge so it doesn't need big teeth, though I still think they're just a bit too small for it to ever become a top tier attack type, unfortunately.
(Jun. 02, 2017 1:42 PM)1234beyblade Wrote: [ -> ]Z2's self recoil isint that huge so it doesn't need big teeth, though I still think they're just a bit too small for it to ever become a top tier attack type, unfortunately.
how does it has low recoil the shape and contact points look so aggressive.
I can't explain how, it's just how it performs in battle lol, even though it looks aggressive you gotta keep in mind that looks can be deceiving.
(Jun. 02, 2017 2:03 PM)1234beyblade Wrote: [ -> ]I can't explain how, it's just how it performs in battle lol, even though it looks aggressive you gotta keep in mind that looks can be deceiving.
haha yea i know but i think there should be a testing thread for z2.i think z2 is like ragnarok(TT ver) has alot of burst attack but bad teeth.
There should be testing threads for a lot of things, people now a days usually keep results to themselves though (or it could be just me). Oh and Z2 is nothing like Ragnaruk lol, Ragnaruk has way too much recoil compared to Z2; R is more like Dranzer S. Also from what I tested Ragnaruk can't get anywhere near the same results as Z2. Z2 can beat Wyvern, Odin, and D2 quite consistently by Burst but Ragnaruk just self bursts because too much recoil as I've said, the two have similar teeth too.
(Jun. 02, 2017 2:15 PM)1234beyblade Wrote: [ -> ]There should be testing threads for a lot of things, people now a days usually keep results to themselves though (or it could be just me). Oh and Z2 is nothing like Ragnaruk lol, Ragnaruk has way too much recoil compared to Z2; R is more like Dranzer S.
yup many new parts need testing and the existing threads are also pretty much dead lol. i dont really own z2 but i think it might be ok or good for burst attack maybe it might find some use on yeilding
Bey Brad already proved Z2 to be good back when it came out, it's an old topic now that I doubt anyone will revisit especially because it wasn't godly for attack. I usually never revisit old stuff but good thing I revisited Acid Anubis just a week ago lol, it totally dominated anime north, who knows maybe if dF gets banned Z2 will be brought up again, but right now I just don't see it, attack is way too dead (by dead I mean high risk low reward) to enter the current meta.
(Jun. 02, 2017 2:23 PM)1234beyblade Wrote: [ -> ]Bey Brad already proved Z2 to be good back when it came out, it's an old topic now that I doubt anyone will revisit especially because it wasn't godly for attack. I usually never revisit old stuff but good thing I revisited Acid Anubis just a week ago lol, it totally dominated anime north, who knows maybe if dF gets banned Z2 will be brought up again, but right now I just don't see it, attack is way too dead (by dead I mean high risk low reward) to enter the current meta.
yea attack types are always risky because they are difficult to control although dF is pretty good .U have a pretty good launch power and launch attack types pretty well though lol. about A2 i think it is on par with K2 from what i have heard in drafts and testings
A2 is better because it can destabilize just like D2 could, so it easily counters Neptune and can beat Wyvern and Odin. Those tests and drafts are outdated because they were probably done before D2 and D ban.
(Jun. 02, 2017 2:15 PM)1234beyblade Wrote: [ -> ]people now a days usually keep results to themselves though (or it could be just me).
Why is that though? I can somewhat understand when there are big competitions like Beyblade North 2017 coming up, but throughout the rest of the year, nobody really benefits from the community being totally clueless about how new parts perform... In fact, we just risk losing a lot of players because they have less idea what to buy and, consequently, would stop buying anything because of this apparent globalized disinterest.
It's because of group chats, for me personally that's the reason, I usually just yell out my findings in the group chat or to Kei directly use it at a tourney or 2 to surprise people and then... It's not discussed ever again lol.
And yes I am aware it's unhealthy Brad said the same thing years ago.
I wish everyone would realise how private chats are not helping in so many ways...
Personally, on the subject of parts testing, I was rather baffled when people mentioned using Acid Anubis to me at Beyblade North 2017. That came out of absolutely nowhere to me, that that Dual Layer had any use and that people were really going to rely on it competitively. That is way not normal, especially as it was released a while ago.
(Jun. 02, 2017 2:47 PM)1234beyblade Wrote: [ -> ]A2 is better because it can destabilize just like D2 could, so it easily counters Neptune and can beat Wyvern and Odin. Those tests and drafts are outdated because they were probably done before D2 and D ban.
can it counter blaze ragnarok?