what are the toptwo drigers made?
I agree, Driger s' ar is a good choice for compacts.
Yeah, I'm agreeing on this. Driger S is probably one of the best blades you can use right out of the box and Driger V2 has some great uses.
Question and Answer topic though? =/
Driger S and Driger MS. I don't like V2 at all.
But yeah, this should've been in Q&A.
(Nov. 09, 2008 11:34 AM)ZeroX Wrote: [ -> ]Driger MS is sex.
In comparison to other HMS it's useless ...
(Nov. 09, 2008 4:55 PM)Bey Brad Wrote: [ -> ] (Nov. 09, 2008 11:34 AM)ZeroX Wrote: [ -> ]Driger MS is sex.
In comparison to other HMS it's useless ...
But it wasn't at first.
I kinda like using the Metal Upper over the Circle Upper, even though Circle Upper is a good amount better. I dunno why.
But I admit I'm using outclassed parts for no reason.
Anyways~
Driger MS and S were probably the best, like Brad said. Driger F had a nice idea, but wasn't very good in the end. Driger V was useless, no matter what model you got of it. Driger V2 had a very nice idea, but it didn't really do it's job properly. Driger G wasn't anything special, either.
(Nov. 09, 2008 5:03 PM)Grey Wrote: [ -> ] (Nov. 09, 2008 4:55 PM)Bey Brad Wrote: [ -> ] (Nov. 09, 2008 11:34 AM)ZeroX Wrote: [ -> ]Driger MS is sex.
In comparison to other HMS it's useless ...
But it wasn't at first.
I kinda like using the Metal Upper over the Circle Upper, even though Circle Upper is a good amount better. I dunno why.
But I admit I'm using outclassed parts for no reason.
Anyways~
Driger MS and S were probably the best, like Brad said. Driger F had a nice idea, but wasn't very good in the end. Driger V was useless, no matter what model you got of it. Driger V2 had a very nice idea, but it didn't really do it's job properly. Driger G wasn't anything special, either.
Okay Driger V was carp but Driger V2 has the potential to outclass even Driger S as their BB has the same height(I has I measured it!) and Triple Tiger is one of the Best Upper Attack ARs in the plastic generations that it caused it to outclass many G and GT series Blades...
(Nov. 09, 2008 5:12 PM)ZenX Wrote: [ -> ] (Nov. 09, 2008 5:03 PM)Grey Wrote: [ -> ] (Nov. 09, 2008 4:55 PM)Bey Brad Wrote: [ -> ] (Nov. 09, 2008 11:34 AM)ZeroX Wrote: [ -> ]Driger MS is sex.
In comparison to other HMS it's useless ...
But it wasn't at first.
I kinda like using the Metal Upper over the Circle Upper, even though Circle Upper is a good amount better. I dunno why.
But I admit I'm using outclassed parts for no reason.
Anyways~
Driger MS and S were probably the best, like Brad said. Driger F had a nice idea, but wasn't very good in the end. Driger V was useless, no matter what model you got of it. Driger V2 had a very nice idea, but it didn't really do it's job properly. Driger G wasn't anything special, either.
Okay Driger V was carp but Driger V2 has the potential to outclass even Driger S as their BB has the same height(I has I measured it!) and Triple Tiger is one of the Best Upper Attack ARs in the plastic generations that it caused it to outclass many G and GT series Blades...
Erm, not really.
The slopes are too close to the blade itself, it can't really lift properly.
Saying that Triple Tiger is amazing because it outclasses many G and GT blades really doesn't prove anything, either. Triple Tiger had it's uses, but it wasn't the best Upper Attack ring out there.
(Nov. 10, 2008 1:26 AM)Grey Wrote: [ -> ]Erm, not really.
The slopes are too close to the blade itself, it can't really lift properly.
Saying that Triple Tiger is amazing because it outclasses many G and GT blades really doesn't prove anything, either. Triple Tiger had it's uses, but it wasn't the best Upper Attack ring out there.
First of all, Triple Tiger is not the best but a good Upper Attack AR
Second, what I meant by saying that it outclasses many G and GT blades were that as a whole Driger G is superior to many of EG using Beyblades.
Overall, I am not overestimating Driger G here, I am just trying to emphasize that its a good fellow among Driger series.
(Nov. 10, 2008 2:06 AM)ZenX Wrote: [ -> ] (Nov. 10, 2008 1:26 AM)Grey Wrote: [ -> ]Erm, not really.
The slopes are too close to the blade itself, it can't really lift properly.
Saying that Triple Tiger is amazing because it outclasses many G and GT blades really doesn't prove anything, either. Triple Tiger had it's uses, but it wasn't the best Upper Attack ring out there.
First of all, Triple Tiger is not the best but a good Upper Attack AR
Second, what I meant by saying that it outclasses many G and GT blades were that as a whole Driger G is superior to many of EG using Beyblades.
Overall, I am not overestimating Driger G here, I am just trying to emphasize that its a good fellow among Driger series.
Right, I realize you aren't. I'm just saying that claiming Driger G was better than most EG blades does not say very much, considering most of them really sucked/were nothing special.
(Nov. 09, 2008 5:12 PM)ZenX Wrote: [ -> ]Okay Driger V was carp but Driger V2 has the potential to outclass even Driger S as their BB has the same height(I has I measured it!) and Triple Tiger is one of the Best Upper Attack ARs in the plastic generations that it caused it to outclass many G and GT series Blades...
Driger V2 does not approach outclassing Driger S.
Tiger Defenser is so much more useful than Upper Claw. Tiger Defenser is a stample of Compacts and Survival types. Upper Claw is outclassed by too many other ARs to be considered useful by any serious Bladers. Upper Dragoon, Triangle Wing, Triple Wing, Triple Tiger, and many others all serve the general purpose better than Upper Claw.
While Driger V2's Customize Metal Change Base is the same as SG Metal Change Base
in theory, in practice is a whole other story. Customize Metal Change's tip is considerably sharper than SG MC's, and is also less compact. The tip sharpness is definitely the most important issue, and is what makes SG MC still the most popular choice.
As for the SP's, Upper Attack, I don't like them. They scrape against the stadium too easily.
(Nov. 10, 2008 3:59 AM)Bey Brad Wrote: [ -> ]Driger V2 does not approach outclassing Driger S.
Tiger Defenser is so much more useful than Upper Claw. Tiger Defenser is a stample of Compacts and Survival types. Upper Claw is outclassed by too many other ARs to be considered useful by any serious Bladers. Upper Dragoon, Triangle Wing, Triple Wing, Triple Tiger, and many others all serve the general purpose better than Upper Claw.
While Driger V2's Customize Metal Change Base is the same as SG Metal Change Base in theory, in practice is a whole other story. Customize Metal Change's tip is considerably sharper than SG MC's, and is also less compact. The tip sharpness is definitely the most important issue, and is what makes SG MC still the most popular choice.
As for the SP's, Upper Attack, I don't like them. They scrape against the stadium too easily.
What I meant by outclassing there is that, in application when you change those Upper Attack SPs with Defense Ring or Survivor Ring you get to have a cuztomization with better Defense capabilities, if you still don't believe me; test it, because, I am not talking out of the blue or according to any theory. Actually here are the customizations that causes me to talk this way:
AR: War Lion
WD: 10 Heavy
SG: HMC Right
SP: Survivor Ring or Defense Ring
BB: Customize Change Base
AR: War Lion
WD: 10 Heavy
SG: HMC Right
BB: Metal Change Base
Besides, I never had any likeness for those so called 4 gram heavy SPs that ruins Driger V2...
I've done this. The second combo is better.
(Nov. 10, 2008 7:03 AM)ZenX Wrote: [ -> ] (Nov. 10, 2008 6:56 AM)Bey Brad Wrote: [ -> ]I've done this. The second combo is better.
No, the first one is...
What are you basing this on?
(Nov. 10, 2008 7:14 AM)Bey Brad Wrote: [ -> ] (Nov. 10, 2008 7:03 AM)ZenX Wrote: [ -> ] (Nov. 10, 2008 6:56 AM)Bey Brad Wrote: [ -> ]I've done this. The second combo is better.
No, the first one is...
What are you basing this on?
Well, I had tested these customizations against each other and against other good customizations in Takara's Balance, Tornado Attack and Defense stadiums(It was years ago though) and the first one beat the latter and against a zombie the first one had shown a better performance where it also performed better and beaten attackers which used Grip Base and SG Grip Change Base in attack mode
(Nov. 10, 2008 7:29 AM)ZenX Wrote: [ -> ]Well, I had tested these customizations against each other and against other good customizations in Takara's Balance, Tornado Attack and Defense stadiums(It was years ago though) and the first one beat the latter and against a zombie the first one had shown a better performance where it also performed better and beaten attackers which used Grip Base and SG Grip Change Base in attack mode
Fighting two combinations against each other is not a reliable way to test which one is better. Fighting the two of them against the same Beyblade and measuring the results is generally better. For Compacts, we use standard yardsticks such as 10bBistool, Galeon, Dranzer V2 ... standard, well-rounded Beyblades.
I'll do some tests in the next few days, but I am confident that SGMC will do better than CMC. SGMC is more compact and is perfectly round whereas the SP will decrease its smoothness.
(Nov. 10, 2008 7:28 AM)ZeroX Wrote: [ -> ]Driger MS is still sex.
and is still one of the lowest-tier HMS Beyblades
(Nov. 10, 2008 7:37 AM)Bey Brad Wrote: [ -> ] (Nov. 10, 2008 7:29 AM)ZenX Wrote: [ -> ]Well, I had tested these customizations against each other and against other good customizations in Takara's Balance, Tornado Attack and Defense stadiums(It was years ago though) and the first one beat the latter and against a zombie the first one had shown a better performance where it also performed better and beaten attackers which used Grip Base and SG Grip Change Base in attack mode
Fighting two combinations against each other is not a reliable way to test which one is better. Fighting the two of them against the same Beyblade and measuring the results is generally better. For Compacts, we use standard yardsticks such as 10bBistool, Galeon, Dranzer V2 ... standard, well-rounded Beyblades.
I'll do some tests in the next few days, but I am confident that SGMC will do better than CMC. SGMC is more compact and is perfectly round whereas the SP will decrease its smoothness.
Well, I am waiting for the results then 0
Quote:Driger F had a nice idea, but wasn't very good in the end.
I'm sorry but what was the idea of driger F? To be a smash attack that can't smash attack and just grinds itself around the edge of the stadium? =S
I'll admit I'm not great with customisations but driger F just plain annoyed me. =[