Nov. 26, 2010 12:22 AM
Nov. 26, 2010 12:28 AM
A more appropriate question would be: Evoloution or Creationism, but religious discussion isn't allowed...
Nov. 26, 2010 12:29 AM
the chocken came first cause if theres no chicken there would be no egg and the eggs would never hatch without the chicken to be there first
Nov. 26, 2010 1:09 AM
Hah, no.
Technically, the egg would have had to come first. Two organisms similar to the chicken would have mated, and then due to genetic variation that occurs during fertilisation, the first chicken would have been born, in the egg.
Technically, the egg would have had to come first. Two organisms similar to the chicken would have mated, and then due to genetic variation that occurs during fertilisation, the first chicken would have been born, in the egg.
Nov. 26, 2010 1:10 AM
this question is un-answerable, as you need an egg to have a chicken, and a chicken to have an egg, so, when humans can find the true meaning of life, then i'll believe what they say came first
Nov. 26, 2010 1:15 AM
by 100s of thousands of years of evolution came the chicken(by early creatures like the chicken so the egg),almost, basically what Momiji said,But if your about relgion the chicken :V easy question.....
rewritten to make some sense
rewritten to make some sense
Nov. 26, 2010 1:17 AM
(Nov. 26, 2010 1:10 AM)alexscott12 Wrote: [ -> ]this question is un-answerable, as you need an egg to have a chicken, and a chicken to have an egg, so, when humans can find the true meaning of life, then i'll believe what they say came first
If you knew anything about Biology, you'd know that's wrong.
Nov. 26, 2010 1:20 AM
yeah taking biology not doing to well in it i need to redo that again :T hopefully get it right this time or i can go ahead and tell i am going to fail my test, anyways....
haha though you were talking about me and theirs no delete post button........
haha though you were talking about me and theirs no delete post button........
Nov. 26, 2010 1:26 AM
ok, you were right, I wasn't thinking there, and that's especially stupid considering we just finished a Biological Diversity unit in science.d'oh
Nov. 26, 2010 1:47 AM
(Nov. 26, 2010 12:28 AM)Chaos Blader Wrote: [ -> ]A more appropriate question would be: Evoloution or Creationism, but religious discussion isn't allowed...
your right, but of course it is the chicken because _________________ ( I have a 10% warning level and it doesn't need to go higher XD)
Nov. 26, 2010 2:25 AM
(Nov. 26, 2010 1:09 AM)momiji manju Wrote: [ -> ]Hah, no.
Technically, the egg would have had to come first. Two organisms similar to the chicken would have mated, and then due to genetic variation that occurs during fertilisation, the first chicken would have been born, in the egg.
"Chicken" comes first in the question
But I digress.
Nov. 26, 2010 2:43 AM
Eggs were around in the age of dinosaurs. Chickens (and indeed all birds) evolved from dinosaurs. Ergo, the egg came first.
[/thread]
[/thread]
Nov. 26, 2010 3:16 AM
(Nov. 26, 2010 2:43 AM)Daegor42 Wrote: [ -> ]Eggs were around in the age of dinosaurs. Chickens (and indeed all birds) evolved from dinosaurs. Ergo, the egg came first.There is really nothing else to discuss about this, hah. If somebody thinks otherwise, then it is probable that we would get into a religious discussion ...
[/thread]