World Beyblade Organization by Fighting Spirits Inc.

Full Version: Plastics vs. HMS vs. MFB's
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Plastics and HMS look the best, but MFB's are stronger, yet Plastics have more innovative features.Wink
O.K. This is an interesting thread. MFB's outclass most HMS and Plastic but, Wolborg MS can still beat quite alot of MFB's. It really depends what beys youre using. Some plastic can beat HMS, some HMS can beat MFB. MFB is the best. Plastic is the coolest. HMS is in the middle. Hope you get my point. Smile
: \
All three can defeat each other with high win rates.
Plastics were the most customizable though.

I can beat any MFB combo I can make with a specialized plastic combo.
(Sep. 26, 2010  11:16 PM)INFINITYDRANZER Wrote: [ -> ]O.K. This is an interesting thread. MFB's outclass most HMS and Plastic but, Wolborg MS can still beat quite alot of MFB's. It really depends what beys youre using. Some plastic can beat HMS, some HMS can beat MFB. MFB is the best. Plastic is the coolest. HMS is in the middle. Hope you get my point. Smile

You psychic! I was going to say that! But ur my BeyFamily,,,, so its fine. Lol I pick plastic cuase it had allfeatures I liked ex: black dranzer blue/grey dragoon green driger (it really exist) pink galeon. Anyways u know wha I mean Wink
I would say that the most innovative would be HMS. Plastics have the most creativity and customization while MFB seems to have a more repetitve style seeing as how so many parts are constantly recycled but they are in fact the most powerful system to date but as McFrown stated, they can all beat each other.
Heh, Heh, Heh. I cant really decide between HMS and MFB. I like all systems actually... Smile I also think that MFB's names are not very imaginative. Unlike things such as Dranzer, Wolborg, Galleon, Burning Kerberous.
Its sounds better to say GO DRANZER! Then, GO DARK WOLF!
True but GO METEO L DRAGO or GO RAY UNICORNO sounds good. Don't forget abt Gravity Persues. I like the name.
MFB names are pretty lame, though the actual naming system for parts is so much easier.
Sortf of like Earth Aquila and Dark Cancer?
(Sep. 26, 2010  11:28 PM)INFINITYDRANZER Wrote: [ -> ]Heh, Heh, Heh. I cant really decide between HMS and MFB. I like all systems actually... Smile I also think that MFB's names are not very imaginative. Unlike things such as Dranzer, Wolborg, Galleon, Burning Kerberous.
Its sounds better to say GO DRANZER! Then, GO DARK WOLF!

I agree, the names for MFB's are so plain and boring. The designs for some MFB's look weird and ugly.
I think were all agreeing on the same thing. Dont criticise me if its not your view.
Plastic: Best Looking HMS: In the Middle MFB: Strongest
So really HMS is the transition between Plastic to MFB and is a balance of strength and style. HMS is my fave then. Smile
(Sep. 26, 2010  11:36 PM)ShinigamiKing Wrote: [ -> ]I agree, the names for MFB's are so plain and boring. The designs for some MFB's look weird and ugly.

Agreed with some of the names.

But disagree with the design of MFB because i said the same thing at first but when i actually got an MFB (which was G.Pegasis) then i was like, ZOMG smexy bey with smexy colours/design!

but its your opinion. /kiss
i like the design of hms the best cause it looked more cooler to me (wolborg ms) than plastics but honeslty i hav the most respect to plastic and mfb. First of all the plastics started it all but mfb introduce a bunch of us new members to this site but hey meteo l drago looks cool too
I guess Ray Unicorno Storm Pegasis or Meteo-L-Drago are pretty cool names.Just the thing with MFB is that the metal wheels look nothing like a AR. But then the Hybrid wheel came along and gave it more desighn.
Personally I don't like the names of the MFB's but the naming system is easier. But HMS look way better (Purple DEMS <3) and really, I liked the dual spin rotations and how the dual shooter was the launcher and "tool".
Plastic had better gimmicks. Like Cyber Dragoon with its jump attack base and gear.