World Beyblade Organization by Fighting Spirits Inc.

This is the only beyblade video game I have and I don't think I ever beat it.

What are the strategies?

That game is incredibly easy to beat. It just takes awhile to earn more parts to customize with.

this is the worst thread ever. why did you even make this topic

i ve never hads the game actually is it fun??

I remember timing your launch/ pressing the button at the correct time proving to be very helpful in terms of beyblade endurance and not getting outspun.

Also, try to unlock as many parts as you can to customise.

k

That game sucked hands down. The GC one was way better.

And considering that the GC one isn't very good either...

GC one loses points for not being a budget title like this was. I got this one on release for $10 new.

But the GC one was made much prettier and polished... If you've ever played the PS1 version it was just like someone let their dog carp inside the jewel case and thought it was good to go.

You do release you are comparing a 32 bit console(the PS) to a 128 bit console(GameCube), right? Essentially you are comparing a present day gun to a gun used in the 30's. It isn't a fair compairison. Besides, they both suck, the GBA RPG one was much better.

Also for those with the PS game, put it in your CD player, you can listen to the background tracks in the game.

I realize that. Do YOU realize that there were some pretty damn... pretty games for the PS1? Castlevania, Rival Schools, CVS, etc... I'm saying they could have made it prettier. And the gameplay was still pretty damn boring compared to the GC version with its four player battles.

And yeah, the GBA game was better.

people actually buy beyblade games? wow.

Beyblade RPG over all else except for blader jam or whatever it was called for the gba because i never played that one.

Takao Wrote:You do release you are comparing a 32 bit console(the PS) to a 128 bit console(GameCube), right? Essentially you are comparing a present day gun to a gun used in the 30's. It isn't a fair compairison.

30's? Bit of hyperbole right there, the systems are like five years apart.

Also I don't see the problem comparing the two; what's the point of advancing ourselves if we can't compare ourselves in retrospect?

Bey Brad Wrote:

Takao Wrote:You do release you are comparing a 32 bit console(the PS) to a 128 bit console(GameCube), right? Essentially you are comparing a present day gun to a gun used in the 30's. It isn't a fair compairison.

30's? Bit of hyperbole right there, the systems are like five years apart.

Also I don't see the problem comparing the two; what's the point of advancing ourselves if we can't compare ourselves in retrospect?

In retrospect I have no problems with. I just have problems with compairing the two in a compeitition. There is obviously limitations to a console released in like 1994, to one released in 2001, that will have been lifted by that time.

Takao Wrote:

Bey Brad Wrote:

Takao Wrote:You do release you are comparing a 32 bit console(the PS) to a 128 bit console(GameCube), right? Essentially you are comparing a present day gun to a gun used in the 30's. It isn't a fair compairison.

30's? Bit of hyperbole right there, the systems are like five years apart.

Also I don't see the problem comparing the two; what's the point of advancing ourselves if we can't compare ourselves in retrospect?

In retrospect I have no problems with. I just have problems with compairing the two in a compeitition. There is obviously limitations to a console released in like 1994, to one released in 2001, that will have been lifted by that time.

i don't think you know what retrospect means

Isn't that when you're looking at things in the past? I don't recall it ever meaning to compare things from the past to relatively present day things in terms of a compeitition. Reviewing the past yes, competing the past with the present? No to sure about that one, Batman.

The G-Rev RPG was kickass. Now, if there was multiplayer in it, it would've kicked much more carp.

Ultimate Blader Jam sucked hard. I don't have the cart anymore, but it...was terrible. End of story.

The GCN game was decent.

Back on topic, the PS1 game was terrible.

Takao Wrote:Isn't that when you're looking at things in the past? I don't recall it ever meaning to compare things from the past to relatively present day things in terms of a compeitition. Reviewing the past yes, competing the past with the present? No to sure about that one, Batman.

pretty sure I said "compare in retrospect", genius

Me= -1