Just to inform everyone on something I have come across while testing spin-stealers: There is a major reason CS was not considered on Dragooon BD145 and that is because it essentially "bottlenecks" the combo. As mentioned previously, CS does not have good stability or LAD capabilities, in other words, it can not spin on it's side as much as RDF or EWD or stay upright as much as XF, GCF, GF.
Having great LAD or stability (Usually one or the other. GCF is a special exception that combines both LAD and Stability) is a major factor in building a spin stealer. Your initial setup is already fantastic: Reviser Dragooon BD145 __. This setup is basically engineered to steal spin very effectively. (This is why you could OS RSF)
But, towards the end of the battle, when both beys fall over (the spin equalizing effect no longer takes place) whichever one has the most LAD will win. Other factors such as higher stability may come into play here too. (see XF, GCF, GF) These types of spin stealers attempt to stay upright longer than their opponent in order to compensate for their sub-par LAD. Because you are using CS, you do not have much stability or LAD. The combo will just fall short of outspinning bottoms with very high stability (see XF, GCF, GF, and in some cases RF) and obviously bottoms with very high LAD (see RDF, WD, EWD)
To be classified as a "good" spin stealer, you must be able to OS some of these tips. So, testing against popular Beyblades know to have very good LAD is a perfect test of spin stealing capabilities. Perhaps you should try testing against Duo/Death Cancer W145WD, Duo SA165EWD.
Because I do not want to come off as someone who blurts theories out without proper tests, I'll try to run some tests tomorrow to show what I mean. Also, I realize you did not have RDF at the time, but I'm just trying to explain why something like CS doesn't work nearly as well as RDF or GF. I hope you can understand my jargon. XD
Having great LAD or stability (Usually one or the other. GCF is a special exception that combines both LAD and Stability) is a major factor in building a spin stealer. Your initial setup is already fantastic: Reviser Dragooon BD145 __. This setup is basically engineered to steal spin very effectively. (This is why you could OS RSF)
But, towards the end of the battle, when both beys fall over (the spin equalizing effect no longer takes place) whichever one has the most LAD will win. Other factors such as higher stability may come into play here too. (see XF, GCF, GF) These types of spin stealers attempt to stay upright longer than their opponent in order to compensate for their sub-par LAD. Because you are using CS, you do not have much stability or LAD. The combo will just fall short of outspinning bottoms with very high stability (see XF, GCF, GF, and in some cases RF) and obviously bottoms with very high LAD (see RDF, WD, EWD)
To be classified as a "good" spin stealer, you must be able to OS some of these tips. So, testing against popular Beyblades know to have very good LAD is a perfect test of spin stealing capabilities. Perhaps you should try testing against Duo/Death Cancer W145WD, Duo SA165EWD.
Because I do not want to come off as someone who blurts theories out without proper tests, I'll try to run some tests tomorrow to show what I mean. Also, I realize you did not have RDF at the time, but I'm just trying to explain why something like CS doesn't work nearly as well as RDF or GF. I hope you can understand my jargon. XD
![[Image: genbullsig.png]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-io7_XMqG5Rc/UbZB3O0wpOI/AAAAAAAAA7U/zjtN6ICXrbc/s800/genbullsig.png)
lol![[Image: vooj.jpg]](https://imageshack.com/a/img607/64/vooj.jpg)
![[Image: 68vfxj.jpg]](https://oi57.tinypic.com/68vfxj.jpg)
