World Beyblade Organization by Fighting Spirits Inc.
Beyblade "Madoka" Review - Printable Version

+- World Beyblade Organization by Fighting Spirits Inc. (https://worldbeyblade.org)
+-- Forum: Other (https://worldbeyblade.org/Forum-Other)
+--- Forum: Closed Threads (https://worldbeyblade.org/Forum-Closed-Threads)
+--- Thread: Beyblade "Madoka" Review (/Thread-Beyblade-Madoka-Review)



Beyblade "Madoka" Review - Justustify - Oct. 31, 2011

Hey, do you guys think Madoka in the Beyblade show is just their for her looks.


RE: Beyblade "Madoka" Review - Ga' - Oct. 31, 2011

This definitely doesn't belong here. And why does it matter?


RE: Beyblade "Madoka" Review - Justustify - Oct. 31, 2011

Its just wierd how MADOKA is like one of the main characters and she dosent really play a big part. Its like the company "Beyblade" ran out of ideas and said"Lets make a main character that dosent have a big part. Its rediculous!


RE: Beyblade "Madoka" Review - Hazel - Oct. 31, 2011

This thread has no purpose and has a really gross, borderline pedophile, vibe to it.


RE: Beyblade "Madoka" Review - Deikailo - Oct. 31, 2011

This belongs in random beyblade anime/manga thoughts.


RE: Beyblade "Madoka" Review - Imperial - Oct. 31, 2011

(Oct. 31, 2011  9:59 PM)EvilSwitch Wrote: Its just wierd how MADOKA is like one of the main characters and she dosent really play a big part. Its like the company "Beyblade" ran out of ideas and said"Lets make a main character that dosent have a big part. Its ridiculous!

Don't mean to fuel this uneeded thread but Madoka is the one who repairs because the main characters aren't able or too lazy to fix them up themselves.


RE: Beyblade "Madoka" Review - Justustify - Oct. 31, 2011

Thats, lame instead it should be Madoka's repair shop instead.


RE: Beyblade "Madoka" Review - Dracomageat - Oct. 31, 2011

No, it's actually a common plot device. The main party are quite often comedy idiots in this sort of thing, meaning the makers have to add a smart but mostly irrelevant character to explain their pseudo-science.


RE: Beyblade "Madoka" Review - Justustify - Oct. 31, 2011

(Oct. 31, 2011  9:55 PM)GaHooleone Wrote: This definitely doesn't belong here. And why does it matter?

This is General Beyblade.


Madoka is general.

(Oct. 31, 2011  10:03 PM)Dracomageat Wrote: No, it's actually a common plot device. The main party are quite often comedy idiots in this sort of thing, meaning the makers have to add a smart but mostly irrelevant character to explain their pseudo-science.

No they don't. They could just make Sora LOVE Ginka or something!


RE: Beyblade "Madoka" Review - sum 472 - Oct. 31, 2011

Not to forget the information on beys the main characters haven't seen yet, and how would they travel all over the world if they had to utillise B-pit same how they are looking for the legend bladers, It certainly isn't portable!


RE: Beyblade "Madoka" Review - Justustify - Oct. 31, 2011

(Oct. 31, 2011  10:07 PM)sum 472 Wrote: Not to forget the information on beys the main characters haven't seen yet, and how would they travel all over the world if they had to utillise B-pit same how they are looking for the legend bladers, It certainly isn't portable!

Ok... Not...


RE: Beyblade "Madoka" Review - Annoying-Fork - Oct. 31, 2011

Am I the only one that had reported this...???

Edit:

And your sarcasm doesn't increase the value of this topic, thank you. \/\/\/


RE: Beyblade "Madoka" Review - Justustify - Oct. 31, 2011

Yep...


RE: Beyblade "Madoka" Review - Samurai Changer - Oct. 31, 2011

(Oct. 31, 2011  10:11 PM)Codeine Extorts Wrote: Am I the only one that had reported this...???

i did too


RE: Beyblade "Madoka" Review - Justustify - Oct. 31, 2011

Ok...So... 2 reports dosent mean this thread goes BAMF!!


RE: Beyblade "Madoka" Review - Daegor42 - Oct. 31, 2011

Beyblade General is for Beyblade the hobby, not the anime.