+- World Beyblade Organization by Fighting Spirits Inc. (https://worldbeyblade.org)
+-- Forum: Other (https://worldbeyblade.org/Forum-Other)
+--- Forum: Closed Threads (https://worldbeyblade.org/Forum-Closed-Threads)
+--- Thread: Battle Strikers Discussion (/Thread-Battle-Strikers-Discussion)
RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - Tempestas007 - Nov. 27, 2009
Awesome.
RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - Bae Master - Nov. 27, 2009
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-bJ1fwikqpE&feature=sdig&et=1259343518.31
Haha
RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - bey tempest - Nov. 27, 2009
whoa odd video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z5xUyJybUzs hah go brad and battle striker team
RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - Jawa - Nov. 27, 2009
(Nov. 25, 2009 3:06 AM)Bey Brad Wrote: I'm always surprised that so many people play this in Beyblade stadiums with no controller ... why not just play Beyblade if you want to do that? Why do you want to turn Battle Strikers into Beyblade?
I gotta back Brad on this one. I've read several posts here and elsewhere that they "tested" Strikers against Beys in a "Bey Stadium". Has anyone ever tried to do it on the Strikers home turf while it (bey)sits there and gets hit by a controlled Striker. Just curious if things would turn out different on the Strikers home turf!
RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - bey tempest - Nov. 27, 2009
its seriously not that different even with a brilliant striker like skullor even dark wolf df145fs can be it even using a controller in the stadium that comes with the tournament set it really doesn't change much.
RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - Bey Brad - Nov. 27, 2009
Seriously guys, design on Battle Strikers began before MFB had even been announced! So, of course they are not designed to beat MFB ... they are not metal.
Of course, now that MFB is out, things may change ...
RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - bey tempest - Nov. 27, 2009
i know they weren't meant to beat mfb but just comparing there performance isn't exactly a bad thing even if battlestrikers lose
RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - Bey Brad - Nov. 27, 2009
(Nov. 27, 2009 8:51 PM)bey tempest Wrote: i know they weren't meant to beat mfb but just comparing there performance isn't exactly a bad thing even if battlestrikers lose
For sure, but how many times does it need to be repeated?
RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - bey tempest - Nov. 27, 2009
true i was only saying to jawa that it doesn't make much difference and i am a bit sick of all this competing product malarkey aswell.
RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - YoPeepz - Nov. 27, 2009
There are like 100 card games in the world, so why cant there be TWO top games? Everyone is free to like both, which is what I do, and from what brad is sayin, they might outclass mfb, who knows?
RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - bey tempest - Nov. 27, 2009
we will have to see when the new set is released sometime soon
RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - Jawa - Nov. 28, 2009
(Nov. 27, 2009 8:46 PM)Bey Brad Wrote: Seriously guys, design on Battle Strikers began before MFB had even been announced! So, of course they are not designed to beat MFB ... they are not metal.
Of course, now that MFB is out, things may change ...
Now THERE's a teaser if I ever heard one
RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - Trik - Nov. 28, 2009
i just saw the battle strikers ad on tv
I think it's the premiere on aussie tv XD
RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - Minion - Nov. 30, 2009
(Nov. 27, 2009 7:48 PM)bey tempest Wrote: whoa odd video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z5xUyJybUzs hah go brad and battle striker team
damn, you've got a nice launch "flick" brad.
RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - Bey Brad - Nov. 30, 2009
(Nov. 30, 2009 4:33 AM)Minion Wrote: damn, you've got a nice launch "flick" brad.
I did this on the basics video, as well. Try it, it's way better than hitting the Launcher IMO.
RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - Bey Brad - Dec. 01, 2009
So, fun teaser for you guys: come January, the heaviest possible Striker will be 63g. Currently I think the heaviest MFB combo is around ... 45g?
Is weight still an issue?
RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - Bae Master - Dec. 01, 2009
Brad, when will we be able to see the new battle strikers????
RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - Bey Brad - Dec. 01, 2009
(Dec. 01, 2009 6:03 PM)Beynval Wrote: Brad, when will we be able to see the new battle strikers????
I am doing my best for you guys. Currently I don't have all the stuff to show. Considering the January release, I don't think we'll keep it secret for much longer. Next two weeks, I'd say.
RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - Kei - Dec. 01, 2009
(Dec. 01, 2009 5:30 PM)Bey Brad Wrote: So, fun teaser for you guys: come January, the heaviest possible Striker will be 63g. Currently I think the heaviest MFB combo is around ... 45g?
Just wondering though for comparison, what is the weight of the heaviest Striker right now?
RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - Bey Brad - Dec. 01, 2009
(Dec. 01, 2009 10:20 PM)Kei Wrote:
Just wondering though for comparison, what is the weight of the heaviest Striker right now?
I'm not sure if the exact amount but i'd guess it's around 40g.
RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - Aqua - Dec. 01, 2009
Wow, that's a huge increase in weight then...
Just wondering; how long is MEGA planning to run Battle Strikers for? Or is it sort of an indefinate thing?
RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - Bey Brad - Dec. 02, 2009
(Dec. 01, 2009 11:06 PM)Aqua Wrote: Wow, that's a huge increase in weight then...
Just wondering; how long is MEGA planning to run Battle Strikers for? Or is it sort of an indefinate thing?
As long as we can sell it for ... lol
RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - Minion - Dec. 02, 2009
woo ha
front page of the site was updated
DRANGON NINJA
I'm enjoying this toy a lot. I brought some over to my friends place today and all of them loved it. I thought that people would think it was neat, but not really care much, instead they were thrilled. The magnetic control gimmick seemed to really pull them in. I told them about the next wave of metal ones and they got even more excited.
I don't feel like strikers is as competitive or collectible as beyblade, but they are definitely an exciting game.
RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - Bae Master - Dec. 02, 2009
(Dec. 02, 2009 6:35 AM)Minion Wrote: I don't feel like strikers is as competitive or collectible as beyblade, but they are definitely an exciting game.I feel the same for the old battle strikers but Brad said he quit beyblade in reason of the new strikers...
must not be just because of work haha
I am expecting a lot from the new strikers, especially because Brad worked on it xD
RE: Battle Strikers Discussion - Dirge - Dec. 02, 2009
how come on the battle strikers site when i click on the metal xs thing it ask me for a password
