|
What you don't like about MFB
|
|
|
Gonna have to agree with Brad on this one lol
|
|
| Dec 13 2008 12:30 PM |
|
|
|
|
Post: #83
The looks are only a question of taste. But I really like MFB for looks. I also really enjoy the excitement from the fact that nobody knows how new releases will fare in the game.
|
|
| Dec 13 2008 01:47 PM |
|
|
|
|
Post: #84
(Dec 12 2008 10:17 PM)Bey Brad Wrote: Um, MFB aren't much smaller than plastics and they're slightly larger than HMS. oh, at one point information said they were slightly smaller than HMS. thats why i said the stuff about size
|
|
| Dec 15 2008 09:07 PM |
|
|
|
|
Post: #85
I've been thinking more about the loss of Weight Disks, and it becomes increasingly more apparent to me that it's really not that big of a deal.
In HMS they really weren't that useful, either. You chose between Circle Heavy or Circle Wide (nobody used Circle Balance) and that was basically it. Then CWDs came out, but there was only one metal CWD, and therefore differentiation there was based on the plastic part. Examining the structure of MFB, it would be incredibly easy to insert a fourth layer between the Track and Bottom. I don't think it would be possible to use the current Track shape, but that's not much of a surprise. In the end, the loss of the WD is only noticeable because these things are really, really top heavy. Inevitably, when we start to see some metal Bottoms introduced I think this will help to alleviate the issue. As I'd stated earlier, Faces with metal cores would be useful, and metal weighted tracks and bottoms are just an inevitability. Bey Brad, WBO Director I am the man who stands at the top of Blading! |
|
| Dec 22 2008 05:03 AM |
|
|





![[Image: Taikitop.png]](http://i229.photobucket.com/albums/ee117/Taiki1994/Taikitop.png)
![[Image: NeekAlert_Signature.jpg]](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v106/Kai-V/NeekAlert_Signature.jpg)
![[Image: retrousermember-11.png]](http://i561.photobucket.com/albums/ss57/neek_alert/Pokemon/retrousermember-11.png)

