Duo Uranus Discussion

gibsonmac · Nov 30 2011 01:09 AM

Here it is Boys and Girls!!! the ultra-hyped Duo Uranus!!!! will it live up to the hype??

Duo Wheel from the new BB-121 Ultimate DX Set, is an interesting wheel, which contrary to popular belief does have very good balance, however it has a gimmick that causes it to spin 'lopsided'. So without further ado, the tests...

S-Mode Tests

Duo Uranus(S- Mode) 230CS vs MFH VariAres R145RF
Duo 28-30
Vari 2-30

Duo 93%

Yes even without so much as a MF-M to aid it, Duo shut out the king, and many others as well...

Duo Uranus (S-mode) 230CS vs MFH Beat Lynx GB145RF
Duo 29-30
Beat 1-30

Duo 96.6%

Beat was in the 'magic height range' and still could not deliver the goods.

Duo Uranus 230CS vs MF VariAres CH120RF (right)
Duo 12-20
Vari 8-20

Duo 60%

Duo Uranus (S- mode) BD145CS vs MFH VariAres R145RF
Duo 27-30
Vari 3-30

Duo 90%

Duo Uranus (S- mode) BD145CS vs MF Blitz Herculeo S130RF
Duo 28-30
Blitz 2-30

Duo 93%

Duo on the BD145 is almost identical to Death on the Boost Disk... they both leave almost no gap what so ever, with the only difference being that Death has a slight more angle to its profile than Duo. Also, Duo has very little recoil to it as well, on S-mode anyway, it's basically a Death with a "A(symmetrical)- mode" so I'd imagine they will put up very similar results, in S-mode anyway..

Just to prove the balance that Duo has, NONE of the Duo combos uses MF-anything, and Duo performed like a rock star!!

As Always, more tests to come, and requests are welcome!!! I can accommodate ANY combo requests.

MFH Duo Uranus BD145CS vs MFH Death (Def)Jupiter BD145CS
Duo 12-20
Death 8-20

Duo 60%

Yeah..Umm.. Duo straight curb stomped Phantom in a proper Stamina test
Duo (s-Mode) Uranus AD145WD vs MF-F Phantom (Stamina mode)Aquario AD145WD
Duo 23-25
Phantom 2-25

Duo 92%

And Phantom should have had the advantage, MF-F and Aquario... and here's the vidya that shows a 4-5 victory for Duo... with Phantoms only win being an immediate recoil KO...

MFH Duo Uranus 230CS vs MFH Basalt Kerbecs 230CS
Duo 19-20
Basalt 1-20

Duo 95%

Duo Uranus B: D vs. MFH Basalt Kerbecs BD145EDS
Duo 17-20
Basalt 3-20

Duo 85%

Duo B: D vs Phantom (Stamina)B: D
Way too many ties to have meaningful results, and after 20-ish rounds there were only 5 clear wins
Duo 1-5
Phantom 4-5

A-mode Tests

Here is a little Teaser

A-mode is super cool, it Forces attack movement on things like WD and B: D, it also adds defense to Duo stamina combos, I was really surprised how fun this mode is.

Duo Uranus AD145RF vs Phantom (Stm) Cancer TH170CS
Duo 18-20 Punted phantom OTS!!!
Phantom 2-20

Duo 90%

Duo Uranus B: D vs Phantom (Stm) Kronos B: D
Duo 5-20
Phantom 15-20

Duo 25%

Duo Uranus AD145WD vs Phantom (Stm) Kronos B: D
Duo 19-20 All KO Smile

Phantom 1-20

Duo 95%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thoughts thus far...

If Death is the 4D evolution of Earth, then Duo has to be the 4D evolution of Basalt. Duo in S-mode is a perfect smooth circle with less recoil than Death, and far better balance (and Death has decent balance anyway), and in A-mode it is even more out of balance in any combo than Basalt Horogium R145, so not only does Death put up better numbers than Basalt in proper defense Combos, BUT it also does the out of balance thing better as well, and its done in a usable way... Basalt is like a 60's corvette, it looks cool, everybody loves them, but they drive like carp, no power steering, underpowered, terrible weight distribution etc... Duo is like a C6 ZR1 Corvette, a highly engineered, powerful race car with great ergos...

Car comparisons aside, Duo straight-up outclasses Basalt, AND is strictly better than Death... Where the modes of Death really do not do much performance wise, Duo's mode changes result in a completely different wheel altogether, this is the first time that the mode changes make such a dramatic impact, so considering this, you are really getting 4 beys in the Ultimate DX set in a way. Don't get me wrong, Death is still a fantastic defense wheel, but now it has SERIOUS competition...

***All tests done with standard procedures***
Do to all the whining tests will be 20-30 rounds

[Image: 635px-5.jpg]

There is NO air manipulation, I do not know why people think changing modes opens up air passages... maybe its like that in the Anime, but not in reality... It's REAL gimmick is weight distribution...

**Primal** · Nov 30 2011 01:12 AM

You should really do 20 rounds anyway. Uncertain

Duo looks pretty good as a defense wheel if it can stop MF Vari R145RF in its tracks. Can you try some stamina testing against MF-H Basalt BD145CS? Try Duo (Stamina) Aquario B: D or something.

Also, can you tell us the results of each battle (KO or OS)?

Blackizard · Nov 30 2011 01:16 AM

What the Duo Uranus? First Death now Duo? 4D is really starting to get interesting now. . . I hope WIng testings come up soon. But hey, 20 rounds though. Can you try MF-H Duo AquarioTH170RS? All heights please.

I'd also liek to see some attack testing for Duo. SUch as Duo UranusCh120RF, R145, and H145.

Raigeko13 · Nov 30 2011 01:18 AM

>All tests done with standard procedures
>10 rounds per test
Nope.avi

Anyways, a request, if you will. Duo Aquario (S) B Grin

vs Basalt BD145/230EDS. Stamina vs. Stamina.
Another: MF Duo ___ (A) R145RF/R²F vs. MF Death Aquario BD145CS

Jaygrazer · Nov 30 2011 01:24 AM

WTF?!?!?!

My testing with BD145CS SUCKED on S mode w/ MF-H against Stamina types, try it out!

Raigeko13 · Nov 30 2011 01:28 AM

It could be the condition of both of your parts that could make such a drastic change in testing results. Such as RF/CS. However it is a bit odd that this can win against MF Variares R145RF.

ShadowL-Drago · Nov 30 2011 01:30 AM

(Nov 30 2011 01:28 AM)Raigeko13 Wrote: It could be the condition of both of your parts that could make such a drastic change in testing results. Such as RF/CS. However it is a bit odd that this can win against MF Variares R145RF.

The results against the VariAres R145RF could be from lack of going all 20 rounds? Anyways my suggestion would be to test against the Blitz Unicorno variants... (85R2F, CH120 R2F etc...)

Blackizard · Nov 30 2011 01:33 AM

I just hate it when people think "Oh it won 9/10 rounds or 10/10 means its good enough!" Like, no no no no. Standard Testing means 20 rounds no matter what. You lack testing bro.

Arupaeo · Nov 30 2011 02:14 AM

(Nov 30 2011 01:09 AM)gibsonmac Wrote:
Tests that have a fighting chance will be done to 20+ rounds, though tests that are 90-100% after 10 rounds will be held at 10.

Hi gibsonmac,

The point of doing 20 rounds is because 10 is not an adequate sample size to make estimates - including an estimate of how it will do on the next 10 rounds... Please increase the testing rounds to at least 20, otherwise they really don't have any value to the community.

Nuzumaki90 · Nov 30 2011 02:36 AM

Along with everyone else, you really do need to do 20 rounds. Also, you made a little typo on the 2nd match, it says Vari instead of Beat/Lynx.

But anyways, could you try out Duo Aquario (S) B : D against MF Death Aquario BD145CS and Duo _ (A) R145RF vs MF-H Basalt Kerbecs BD145MB? EDIT: Could you also try Duo Aquario (S) B : D vs Phantom Orion B : D

**Benjohadi** · Nov 30 2011 02:45 AM

How MINT or worned is your RF?
also try on LRF, R2F..
test also against MF Blitz&Vari Ares 85 MF&XF, Vari Ares CH120 RF & R2F & LRF
test them all... Grin

Sniper™ · Nov 30 2011 02:52 AM

(Nov 30 2011 01:28 AM)Raigeko13 Wrote: It could be the condition of both of your parts that could make such a drastic change in testing results. Such as RF/CS. However it is a bit odd that this can win against MF Variares R145RF.

Alot of things can beat MF Variares R145 RF. Also for some reason i think Duo and Capricorn go together

Raigeko13 · Nov 30 2011 02:54 AM

I can see how you think that Sniper - thought the exact same thing. The MW is very similar to the designs on teh MW... If it fits good, and if Duo is equal (when the Frame is balanced) I think that it could be great weight distribution.

Flame Aries · Nov 30 2011 02:57 AM

Can you try some test with test with Uranus in Attack mode?

gibsonmac · Nov 30 2011 03:06 AM

Well when 10/10 comes up, standard deviation would only account for a +/- 2 at most, so they ARE in fact valid... Do any of you know anything regarding how statistics work??? I'm guessing none of you have ever taken a college level stats class, let alone a Graduate level stats class, except maybe Arupaeo, I had to sit through 3 stats classes when I got my Poly Science degree... at the time I thought it was pointless unless I was going to be a card counter or a researcher of demographics... but alas, beyblade

So look up standard deviations and sample sizes...

a 100% win rate out of 10, can not and will not magically become anything less than 75% when expanded to a sample size of twenty..

Quite honestly the only way to have proper 'valid' results is 100 rounds per test, or really 1000 per test... but since no sane person would do that...

20 rounds, statistically, is no more or less valid than 10 rounds really.

**[Pyro]** · Nov 30 2011 03:10 AM

to piggy-back off Flame Aries, please try some attack mode combos, ESPECIALLY with a B:D. I would really like to see how the attack mode would work on a B:D...

Raigeko13 · Nov 30 2011 03:11 AM

>When derp derp is 1 and 2 variables
No.
You must abide by those standards which have been presented to you.
This is the WBO, not college.
The 20 rounds is to get a good average of something. 10 rounds is not much at all. 20 is double that, making them double accurate.
And no, statistically 20 rounds "is no more or less valid than 10 rounds really" because it can mean the difference between percentages in increments of 5.

I'm in 9th Grade.
kthxbai

gibsonmac · Nov 30 2011 03:11 AM

(Nov 30 2011 01:24 AM)Galaxy Jay Wrote: WTF?!?!?!

My testing with BD145CS SUCKED on S mode w/ MF-H against Stamina types, try it out!

well yeah, against stamina... Duo CS will not win against Phantom/Scythe WD

(Nov 30 2011 01:28 AM)Raigeko13 Wrote: However it is a bit odd that this can win against MF Variares R145RF.

how is it odd?? its pretty much a Death doppelganger which owns VariAres

*Dan* · Nov 30 2011 03:20 AM

Try CH120 on VariAres, see how that does.

Flaunting college degrees isn't relevant and should stay off the boards: it will lead to more personally-oriented arguments most of the time.

For all I know they could all be art degrees.

*Shabalabadoo* · Nov 30 2011 03:27 AM

(Nov 30 2011 03:06 AM)gibsonmac Wrote: Well when 10/10 comes up, standard deviation would only account for a +/- 2 at most, so they ARE in fact valid... Do any of you know anything regarding how statistics work??? I'm guessing none of you have ever taken a college level stats class, let alone a Graduate level stats class, except maybe Arupaeo, I had to sit through 3 stats classes when I got my Poly Science degree... at the time I thought it was pointless unless I was going to be a card counter or a researcher of demographics... but alas, beyblade

So look up standard deviations and sample sizes...

a 100% win rate out of 10, can not and will not magically become anything less than 80% when expanded to a sample size of twenty..

Quite honestly the only way to have proper 'valid' results is 100 rounds per test, or really 1000 per test... but since no sane person would do that...

20 rounds, statistically, is no more or less valid than 10 rounds really.

From what I understand, Kai-V has lots of knowledge about statistics, and has said multiple times that she learned that 30 is in fact the absolute minimum.

10 is less than 30. I went to college for 4 years to learn that.

But we also have to consider what the original tests are for. The great combos for parts are never found right away when doing these "[Part] Discussion" topics, and rarely found in these topics anyways. They're mostly just a guideline, really. We also always prefer to have more than one person do any given test; so 10 rounds is not invalid, but certainly not what we would prefer. Spend some extra time and make them worthwhile!

gibsonmac Uberschall	Post: #1 (This post was last modified: Dec 01 2011 10:51 PM by gibsonmac.) Here it is Boys and Girls!!! the ultra-hyped Duo Uranus!!!! will it live up to the hype?? Duo Wheel from the new BB-121 Ultimate DX Set, is an interesting wheel, which contrary to popular belief does have very good balance, however it has a gimmick that causes it to spin 'lopsided'. So without further ado, the tests... S-Mode Tests Duo Uranus(S- Mode) 230CS vs MFH VariAres R145RF Duo 28-30 Vari 2-30 Duo 93% Yes even without so much as a MF-M to aid it, Duo shut out the king, and many others as well... Duo Uranus (S-mode) 230CS vs MFH Beat Lynx GB145RF Duo 29-30 Beat 1-30 Duo 96.6% Beat was in the 'magic height range' and still could not deliver the goods. Duo Uranus 230CS vs MF VariAres CH120RF (right) Duo 12-20 Vari 8-20 Duo 60% Duo Uranus (S- mode) BD145CS vs MFH VariAres R145RF Duo 27-30 Vari 3-30 Duo 90% Duo Uranus (S- mode) BD145CS vs MF Blitz Herculeo S130RF Duo 28-30 Blitz 2-30 Duo 93% Duo on the BD145 is almost identical to Death on the Boost Disk... they both leave almost no gap what so ever, with the only difference being that Death has a slight more angle to its profile than Duo. Also, Duo has very little recoil to it as well, on S-mode anyway, it's basically a Death with a "A(symmetrical)- mode" so I'd imagine they will put up very similar results, in S-mode anyway.. Just to prove the balance that Duo has, NONE of the Duo combos uses MF-anything, and Duo performed like a rock star!! As Always, more tests to come, and requests are welcome!!! I can accommodate ANY combo requests. MFH Duo Uranus BD145CS vs MFH Death (Def)Jupiter BD145CS Duo 12-20 Death 8-20 Duo 60% Yeah..Umm.. Duo straight curb stomped Phantom in a proper Stamina test Duo (s-Mode) Uranus AD145WD vs MF-F Phantom (Stamina mode)Aquario AD145WD Duo 23-25 Phantom 2-25 Duo 92% And Phantom should have had the advantage, MF-F and Aquario... and here's the vidya that shows a 4-5 victory for Duo... with Phantoms only win being an immediate recoil KO... MFH Duo Uranus 230CS vs MFH Basalt Kerbecs 230CS Duo 19-20 Basalt 1-20 Duo 95% Duo Uranus B: D vs. MFH Basalt Kerbecs BD145EDS Duo 17-20 Basalt 3-20 Duo 85% Duo B: D vs Phantom (Stamina)B: D Way too many ties to have meaningful results, and after 20-ish rounds there were only 5 clear wins Duo 1-5 Phantom 4-5 A-mode Tests Here is a little Teaser A-mode is super cool, it Forces attack movement on things like WD and B: D, it also adds defense to Duo stamina combos, I was really surprised how fun this mode is. Duo Uranus AD145RF vs Phantom (Stm) Cancer TH170CS Duo 18-20 Punted phantom OTS!!! Phantom 2-20 Duo 90% Duo Uranus B: D vs Phantom (Stm) Kronos B: D Duo 5-20 Phantom 15-20 Duo 25% Duo Uranus AD145WD vs Phantom (Stm) Kronos B: D Duo 19-20 All KO Phantom 1-20 Duo 95% -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Thoughts thus far... If Death is the 4D evolution of Earth, then Duo has to be the 4D evolution of Basalt. Duo in S-mode is a perfect smooth circle with less recoil than Death, and far better balance (and Death has decent balance anyway), and in A-mode it is even more out of balance in any combo than Basalt Horogium R145, so not only does Death put up better numbers than Basalt in proper defense Combos, BUT it also does the out of balance thing better as well, and its done in a usable way... Basalt is like a 60's corvette, it looks cool, everybody loves them, but they drive like carp, no power steering, underpowered, terrible weight distribution etc... Duo is like a C6 ZR1 Corvette, a highly engineered, powerful race car with great ergos... Car comparisons aside, Duo straight-up outclasses Basalt, AND is strictly better than Death... Where the modes of Death really do not do much performance wise, Duo's mode changes result in a completely different wheel altogether, this is the first time that the mode changes make such a dramatic impact, so considering this, you are really getting 4 beys in the Ultimate DX set in a way. Don't get me wrong, Death is still a fantastic defense wheel, but now it has SERIOUS competition... *All tests done with standard procedures* Do to all the whining tests will be 20-30 rounds There is NO air manipulation, I do not know why people think changing modes opens up air passages... maybe its like that in the Anime, but not in reality... It's REAL gimmick is weight distribution... The First thing every blader should buy is MF and MF2... Metal Faces are necessary people!! Know them, Live them, LOVE them, find them on eBay if you have to, just get them!!!
Nov 30 2011 01:09 AM

Primal Dragooon Rage	Post: #2 You should really do 20 rounds anyway. Duo looks pretty good as a defense wheel if it can stop MF Vari R145RF in its tracks. Can you try some stamina testing against MF-H Basalt BD145CS? Try Duo (Stamina) Aquario B: D or something. Also, can you tell us the results of each battle (KO or OS)?
Nov 30 2011 01:12 AM

Blackizard Jon™ BeyRank: #197 (1,082)	Post: #3 (This post was last modified: Nov 30 2011 01:17 AM by Blackizard.) What the Duo Uranus? First Death now Duo? 4D is really starting to get interesting now. . . I hope WIng testings come up soon. But hey, 20 rounds though. Can you try MF-H Duo AquarioTH170RS? All heights please. I'd also liek to see some attack testing for Duo. SUch as Duo UranusCh120RF, R145, and H145. Click here for the most classic thread on WBO of all time. Enjoy! Blade so hard bladers wanna fine me!
Nov 30 2011 01:16 AM

Raigeko13 SamuRAI IfRAId	Post: #4 (This post was last modified: Nov 30 2011 01:19 AM by Raigeko13.) >All tests done with standard procedures >10 rounds per test Nope.avi Anyways, a request, if you will. Duo Aquario (S) B vs Basalt BD145/230EDS. Stamina vs. Stamina. Another: MF Duo ___ (A) R145RF/R²F vs. MF Death Aquario BD145CS
Nov 30 2011 01:18 AM

Jaygrazer dat gundam yo	Post: #5 WTF?!?!?! My testing with BD145CS SUCKED on S mode w/ MF-H against Stamina types, try it out!
Nov 30 2011 01:24 AM

Raigeko13 SamuRAI IfRAId	Post: #6 It could be the condition of both of your parts that could make such a drastic change in testing results. Such as RF/CS. However it is a bit odd that this can win against MF Variares R145RF.
Nov 30 2011 01:28 AM

ShadowL-Drago The Dragon Emperor	Post: #7 (Nov 30 2011 01:28 AM)Raigeko13 Wrote: It could be the condition of both of your parts that could make such a drastic change in testing results. Such as RF/CS. However it is a bit odd that this can win against MF Variares R145RF. The results against the VariAres R145RF could be from lack of going all 20 rounds? Anyways my suggestion would be to test against the Blitz Unicorno variants... (85R2F, CH120 R2F etc...) ALL NORTH TEXAS BLADERS CHECK THIS THREAD OUT!!! http://worldbeyblade.org/Thread-DFW-Texa...rth-Thread Check out my YouTube Channel! I take battle requests! SUB http://www.youtube.com/user/PozJoker4444?feature=guide
Nov 30 2011 01:30 AM

Blackizard Jon™ BeyRank: #197 (1,082)	Post: #8 (This post was last modified: Nov 30 2011 01:34 AM by Blackizard.) I just hate it when people think "Oh it won 9/10 rounds or 10/10 means its good enough!" Like, no no no no. Standard Testing means 20 rounds no matter what. You lack testing bro. Click here for the most classic thread on WBO of all time. Enjoy! Blade so hard bladers wanna fine me!
Nov 30 2011 01:33 AM

Arupaeo #299 and climbing! BeyRank: #299 (1,034)	Post: #9 (This post was last modified: Nov 30 2011 02:14 AM by Arupaeo.) (Nov 30 2011 01:09 AM)gibsonmac Wrote: Tests that have a fighting chance will be done to 20+ rounds, though tests that are 90-100% after 10 rounds will be held at 10. Hi gibsonmac, The point of doing 20 rounds is because 10 is not an adequate sample size to make estimates - including an estimate of how it will do on the next 10 rounds... Please increase the testing rounds to at least 20, otherwise they really don't have any value to the community.
Nov 30 2011 02:14 AM

Nuzumaki90	Post: #10 (This post was last modified: Nov 30 2011 02:39 AM by Nuzumaki90.) Along with everyone else, you really do need to do 20 rounds. Also, you made a little typo on the 2nd match, it says Vari instead of Beat/Lynx. But anyways, could you try out Duo Aquario (S) B : D against MF Death Aquario BD145CS and Duo _ (A) R145RF vs MF-H Basalt Kerbecs BD145MB? EDIT: Could you also try Duo Aquario (S) B : D vs Phantom Orion B : D
Nov 30 2011 02:36 AM

Benjohadi Stark Industries	Post: #11 How MINT or worned is your RF? also try on LRF, R2F.. test also against MF Blitz&Vari Ares 85 MF&XF, Vari Ares CH120 RF & R2F & LRF test them all... My collection 1 year ago My plastics anf MFB parts shop...visit my shop for a nice deals and promotions
Nov 30 2011 02:45 AM

Sniper™ on my way to the top BeyRank: #283 (1,037)	Post: #12 (Nov 30 2011 01:28 AM)Raigeko13 Wrote: It could be the condition of both of your parts that could make such a drastic change in testing results. Such as RF/CS. However it is a bit odd that this can win against MF Variares R145RF. Alot of things can beat MF Variares R145 RF. Also for some reason i think Duo and Capricorn go together TEAM KIRIN DESTROYERS Follow me on Twitter @MahoutsukaiDomo
Nov 30 2011 02:52 AM

Raigeko13 SamuRAI IfRAId	Post: #13 I can see how you think that Sniper - thought the exact same thing. The MW is very similar to the designs on teh MW... If it fits good, and if Duo is equal (when the Frame is balanced) I think that it could be great weight distribution.
Nov 30 2011 02:54 AM

Flame Aries The Zodiacs BeyRank: #305 (1,032)	Post: #14 Can you try some test with test with Uranus in Attack mode? Zodiacs Tournament in Philly! Join us now!
Nov 30 2011 02:57 AM

gibsonmac Uberschall	Post: #15 (This post was last modified: Dec 01 2011 12:40 AM by gibsonmac.) Well when 10/10 comes up, standard deviation would only account for a +/- 2 at most, so they ARE in fact valid... Do any of you know anything regarding how statistics work??? I'm guessing none of you have ever taken a college level stats class, let alone a Graduate level stats class, except maybe Arupaeo, I had to sit through 3 stats classes when I got my Poly Science degree... at the time I thought it was pointless unless I was going to be a card counter or a researcher of demographics... but alas, beyblade So look up standard deviations and sample sizes... a 100% win rate out of 10, can not and will not magically become anything less than 75% when expanded to a sample size of twenty.. Quite honestly the only way to have proper 'valid' results is 100 rounds per test, or really 1000 per test... but since no sane person would do that... 20 rounds, statistically, is no more or less valid than 10 rounds really. The First thing every blader should buy is MF and MF2... Metal Faces are necessary people!! Know them, Live them, LOVE them, find them on eBay if you have to, just get them!!!
Nov 30 2011 03:06 AM

[Pyro] Absolutely Flawless	Post: #16 to piggy-back off Flame Aries, please try some attack mode combos, ESPECIALLY with a B:D. I would really like to see how the attack mode would work on a B:D... "That's Debatable" TEAM KIRIN DESTROYERS
Nov 30 2011 03:10 AM

Raigeko13 SamuRAI IfRAId	Post: #17 >When derp derp is 1 and 2 variables No. You must abide by those standards which have been presented to you. This is the WBO, not college. The 20 rounds is to get a good average of something. 10 rounds is not much at all. 20 is double that, making them double accurate. And no, statistically 20 rounds "is no more or less valid than 10 rounds really" because it can mean the difference between percentages in increments of 5. I'm in 9th Grade. kthxbai
Nov 30 2011 03:11 AM

gibsonmac Uberschall	Post: #18 (This post was last modified: Nov 30 2011 03:16 AM by gibsonmac.) (Nov 30 2011 01:24 AM)Galaxy Jay Wrote: WTF?!?!?! My testing with BD145CS SUCKED on S mode w/ MF-H against Stamina types, try it out! well yeah, against stamina... Duo CS will not win against Phantom/Scythe WD (Nov 30 2011 01:28 AM)Raigeko13 Wrote: However it is a bit odd that this can win against MF Variares R145RF. how is it odd?? its pretty much a Death doppelganger which owns VariAres The First thing every blader should buy is MF and MF2... Metal Faces are necessary people!! Know them, Live them, LOVE them, find them on eBay if you have to, just get them!!!
Nov 30 2011 03:11 AM

*Dan* zain r u there bro? BeyRank: #406 (1,007)	Post: #19 Try CH120 on VariAres, see how that does. Flaunting college degrees isn't relevant and should stay off the boards: it will lead to more personally-oriented arguments most of the time. For all I know they could all be art degrees. Hacking someone without their permission is illegal.
Nov 30 2011 03:20 AM

*Shabalabadoo* Tralala lalalala	Post: #20 (Nov 30 2011 03:06 AM)gibsonmac Wrote: Well when 10/10 comes up, standard deviation would only account for a +/- 2 at most, so they ARE in fact valid... Do any of you know anything regarding how statistics work??? I'm guessing none of you have ever taken a college level stats class, let alone a Graduate level stats class, except maybe Arupaeo, I had to sit through 3 stats classes when I got my Poly Science degree... at the time I thought it was pointless unless I was going to be a card counter or a researcher of demographics... but alas, beyblade So look up standard deviations and sample sizes... a 100% win rate out of 10, can not and will not magically become anything less than 80% when expanded to a sample size of twenty.. Quite honestly the only way to have proper 'valid' results is 100 rounds per test, or really 1000 per test... but since no sane person would do that... 20 rounds, statistically, is no more or less valid than 10 rounds really. From what I understand, Kai-V has lots of knowledge about statistics, and has said multiple times that she learned that 30 is in fact the absolute minimum. 10 is less than 30. I went to college for 4 years to learn that. But we also have to consider what the original tests are for. The great combos for parts are never found right away when doing these "[Part] Discussion" topics, and rarely found in these topics anyways. They're mostly just a guideline, really. We also always prefer to have more than one person do any given test; so 10 rounds is not invalid, but certainly not what we would prefer. Spend some extra time and make them worthwhile!
Nov 30 2011 03:27 AM